IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v187y2024ics0965856424002179.html

Pedestrian crossings: Design recommendations do not reflect users’ experiences in a car-dominated environment in Auckland, New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Bozovic, T.
  • Hinckson, E.
  • Smith, M.

Abstract

Pedestrian crossings are a staple of city design and a key feature both in terms of risk of road trauma and impacts on pedestrian experience. In car-dominated environments, the challenge is in retrofitting existing infrastructure to enable and encourage walking. It is unclear what diverse people might find difficult and to what extent existing design recommendations identify those needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Bozovic, T. & Hinckson, E. & Smith, M., 2024. "Pedestrian crossings: Design recommendations do not reflect users’ experiences in a car-dominated environment in Auckland, New Zealand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:187:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424002179
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002179
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Penelope Carroll & Karen Witten & Robin Kearns & Phil Donovan, 2015. "Kids in the City: Children's Use and Experiences of Urban Neighbourhoods in Auckland, New Zealand," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 417-436, October.
    2. Andrews, Gavin J. & Hall, Edward & Evans, Bethan & Colls, Rachel, 2012. "Moving beyond walkability: On the potential of health geography," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(11), pages 1925-1932.
    3. Sallis, James F & Bull, Fiona & Burdett, Ricky & Frank, Lawrence D. & Griffiths, Peter & Giles-Corti, Billie & Stevenson, Mark, 2016. "Use of science to guide city planning policy and practice: how to achieve healthy and sustainable future cities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68652, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Jonas De Vos & Katrin Lättman & Anna-Lena van der Vlugt & Janina Welsch & Noriko Otsuka, 2023. "Determinants and effects of perceived walkability: a literature review, conceptual model and research agenda," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 303-324, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan, Tommy Ho-Yin, 2025. "Socio-material perspectives on perceived accessibility of cycling: A sociological inquiry into practices, regulations and informal rules," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ieva Ubarte & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2017. "MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Judith Schröder & Susanne Moebus & Julita Skodra, 2022. "Selected Research Issues of Urban Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-28, May.
    4. Badland, Hannah & Pearce, Jamie, 2019. "Liveable for whom? Prospects of urban liveability to address health inequities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 94-105.
    5. Battista, Geoffrey A. & Manaugh, Kevin, 2018. "Stores and mores: Toward socializing walkability," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 53-60.
    6. Paula Hooper & Sarah Foster & Billie Giles-Corti, 2019. "A Case Study of a Natural Experiment Bridging the ‘Research into Policy’ and ‘Evidence-Based Policy’ Gap for Active-Living Science," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Robbennolt, Dale & Beliveau, Anna & Bhat, Chandra R., 2025. "An investigation of physical participation dissonance and virtual activity participation in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. Magyar, Marton & Ala-Hulkko, Terhi & Antikainen, Harri & Lankila, Tiina & Kotavaara, Ossi, 2025. "Utilizing mobile phone tracking data to estimate Intra-City modal mobility: A study on active mobility in two Finnish City regions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    9. Jeffrey, Dana & Boulangé, Claire & Giles-Corti, Billie & Washington, Simon & Gunn, Lucy, 2019. "Using walkability measures to identify train stations with the potential to become transit oriented developments located in walkable neighbourhoods," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 221-231.
    10. Mariano Gallo & Mario Marinelli, 2020. "Sustainable Mobility: A Review of Possible Actions and Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.
    11. Schindler, Mirjam & Wang, Judith Y.T. & Connors, Richard D., 2021. "A two-stage residential location and transport mode choice model with exposure to traffic-induced air pollution," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Miao, Congcong & Chen, Xiang & Zhang, Chuanrong, 2025. "Perceived built environment and non-motorist crashes: An exploration with street view imagery," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    13. Abouelela, Mohamed & Durán-Rodas, David & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2024. "Do we all need shared E-scooters? An accessibility-centered spatial equity evaluation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    14. Calvin P Tribby & Harvey J Miller & Barbara B Brown & Carol M Werner & Ken R Smith, 2017. "Analyzing walking route choice through built environments using random forests and discrete choice techniques," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(6), pages 1145-1167, November.
    15. Ayse Ozbil Torun & Ilayda Zelal Akın & Heval Bingol & Margaret Anne Defeyter & Yucel Can Severcan, 2024. "Children’s Perspectives of Neighbourhood Spaces: Gender-Based Insights From Participatory Mapping and GIS Analysis," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9.
    16. Oscilowicz, Emilia & Solís, Guadalupe A. & Martinez, Laura & Németh, Jeremy & Simon, Gregory L. & Makarewicz, Carrie & Dickinson, Katherine & McKenzie, Lisa M. & Scandlyn, Jean & Erices-Ocampo, Paulin, 2024. "The Role of Community Science in Addressing Policy Change: A Critical Review of Air Pollution Literature," SocArXiv mxv5k, Center for Open Science.
    17. Negm, Hisham & De Vos, Jonas & Pot, Felix & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2025. "Perceived accessibility: A literature review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    18. Ana Louro & Nuno Marques da Costa & Eduarda Marques da Costa, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Mobility Policies as a Path to Healthy Cities—The Case Study of LMA, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-32, May.
    19. Kimihiro Hino & Ayako Taniguchi & Masamichi Hanazato & Daisuke Takagi, 2019. "Modal Shift from Cars and Promotion of Walking by Providing Pedometers in Yokohama City, Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, June.
    20. Hui Kong & Yang Yu & Jingyi Wu & Yunhan Zheng & Hao Chao & Pengfei Li & Luxia Zhang, 2025. "Impacts of high-speed rail on intercity patient mobility: evidence from chronic kidney disease hospitalization in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:187:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424002179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.