Author
Listed:
- Miao, Congcong
- Chen, Xiang
- Zhang, Chuanrong
Abstract
Walking, cycling, and other forms of non-motorized travel are widely promoted in urban and transportation planning for their evident health and environmental benefits. However, ensuring travel safety for non-motorists remains a significant challenge. Existing risk assessments of non-motorist safety issues primarily focus on objectively measured traffic conditions (e.g., land use, road width, and the presence of sidewalks), while overlooking individuals' perceptions of the built environment. In this paper, we explore how the perceived built environment can impact traffic crashes involving non-motorists by employing Google Street View (GSV) data. Specifically, we have quantified six perceptual attributes (i.e., beautiful, boring, depressing, lively, safe, and wealthy) around non-motorist crash locations using GSV images and machine learning models trained by the MIT Place Pulse 2.0 dataset. Negative binomial regression models are developed to examine the associations between these perceptual attributes and a nine-year non-motorist traffic crash dataset in Hartford, Connecticut. We also apply different buffer sizes to test the sensitivity of the associations, revealing the buffer size that is the most relevant to travel safety. Our results indicate that the perceived beauty, safety, and wealthiness of the built environment are negatively associated with non-motorist crash risk, whereas the perceived liveliness, depression, and boredom of the environment have positive correlations. The findings can shed insights into the mechanistic intersection of environmental perceptions and traffic crashes involving non-motorists. By incorporating the perceptual dimensions into crash analysis, stakeholders in the planning and transportation sectors can develop targeted, street-level interventions to enhance road safety.
Suggested Citation
Miao, Congcong & Chen, Xiang & Zhang, Chuanrong, 2025.
"Perceived built environment and non-motorist crashes: An exploration with street view imagery,"
Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:128:y:2025:i:c:s0966692325002546
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104363
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:128:y:2025:i:c:s0966692325002546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.