IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v66y2021ics0160791x21001561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Islamic alternatives to the ethical maxims of modern technology from the perspective of Mario Bunge

Author

Listed:
  • Taqavi, Mostafa
  • Kafaee, Mahdi
  • Ravanbakhsh, Rostam

Abstract

Mario Bunge argues that the ethics of modern technology are guided by five maxims. He believes that these maxims comprise the core of the ethics of the technology that has prevailed in all industrial societies. They justify the unlimited exploitation of natural and social resources and ignore the dark side of technology. These maxims include the following: Man is separate from and more valuable than nature; man has the right (or even the duty) to subdue nature to his own benefit; man has no responsibility toward nature; the ultimate task of technology is the fullest exploitation of natural and human resources; technologists and technicians are morally irresponsible. He critically formulated these principles in 1979, and today all but one of them have been amended in technology-related ethical guidelines and codes. Although the rejection of these cases is theoretically agreed upon by all, different perspectives offer different alternatives. In the present article, by referring to Quranic verses and the ideas of Muslim thinkers, it is attempted to present five maxims, contrasting these maxims, based on which the ethics of technology are built.

Suggested Citation

  • Taqavi, Mostafa & Kafaee, Mahdi & Ravanbakhsh, Rostam, 2021. "Islamic alternatives to the ethical maxims of modern technology from the perspective of Mario Bunge," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:66:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21001561
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X21001561
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ravanbakhsh, Rostam & Taqavi, Mostafa, 2020. "Muslim scholars and technological volition," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    2. Taebi, Behnam & Roeser, Sabine & van de Poel, Ibo, 2012. "The ethics of nuclear power: Social experiments, intergenerational justice, and emotions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 202-206.
    3. de Wildt, T.E. & Chappin, E.J.L. & van de Kaa, G. & Herder, P.M. & van de Poel, I.R., 2019. "Conflicting values in the smart electricity grid a comprehensive overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 184-196.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kafaee, Mahdi & Ansarian, Zeinab & Taqavi, Mostafa & Heidari, Sedighe, 2021. "Design for well-being: The fourth generation of technology development," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalpokiene, Julija & Kalpokas, Ignas, 2023. "Creative encounters of a posthuman kind – anthropocentric law, artificial intelligence, and art," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Carbajo, Ruth & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2018. "Renewable energy research and technologies through responsible research and innovation looking glass: Reflexions, theoretical approaches and contemporary discourses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 792-808.
    3. Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu & Muhittin Hakan Demir & Sebnem Altinci, 2022. "Understanding the Citizen’s Role in the Transition to a Smart Energy System: Are We Ready?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Jiqing Liu & Gui Zhang & Xiaojing Lv & Jiayu Li, 2022. "Discovering the Landscape and Evolution of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): Science Mapping Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-32, July.
    5. Flavio Guerhardt & Thadeu Alfredo Farias Silva & Felix Martin Carbajal Gamarra & Silvestre Eduardo Rocha Ribeiro Júnior & Segundo Alberto Vásquez Llanos & Ada Patricia Barturén Quispe & Milton Vieira , 2020. "A Smart Grid System for Reducing Energy Consumption and Energy Cost in Buildings in São Paulo, Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Behnam Taebi & Jan H. Kwakkel & Céline Kermisch, 2020. "Governing climate risks in the face of normative uncertainties," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(5), September.
    7. Hugo Lucas & Ruth Carbajo & Tomoo Machiba & Evgeny Zhukov & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2021. "Improving Public Attitude towards Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Invernizzi, Diletta Colette & Locatelli, Giorgio & Brookes, Naomi & Davis, Allison, 2020. "Qualitative comparative analysis as a method for project studies: The case of energy infrastructure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. Tuomela, Sanna & de Castro Tomé, Mauricio & Iivari, Netta & Svento, Rauli, 2021. "Impacts of home energy management systems on electricity consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    10. Perri, Cecilia & Giglio, Carlo & Corvello, Vincenzo, 2020. "Smart users for smart technologies: Investigating the intention to adopt smart energy consumption behaviors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Norouzi, Farshid & Hoppe, Thomas & Elizondo, Laura Ramirez & Bauer, Pavol, 2022. "A review of socio-technical barriers to Smart Microgrid development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Jenkins, Kirsten & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & McCauley, Darren, 2018. "Humanizing sociotechnical transitions through energy justice: An ethical framework for global transformative change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 66-74.
    13. Jenkins, Lekelia Danielle & Dreyer, Stacia Jeanne & Polis, Hilary Jacqueline & Beaver, Ezra & Kowalski, Adam A. & Linder, Hannah L. & McMillin, Thomas Neal & McTiernan, Kaylie Laura & Rogier, Thea The, 2018. "Human dimensions of tidal energy: A review of theories and frameworks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 323-337.
    14. Kwok, Tin Fai & Yeung, Chung Hang & Xu, Yuan, 2017. "Swaying public opinion on nuclear energy: A field experiment in Hong Kong," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 48-57.
    15. Putra, D.I. Ansusa & Hidayaturrahman, Mohammad, 2020. "The roles of technology in al-Quran exegesis in Indonesia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:66:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21001561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.