Unbiased modified likelihood ratio tests for simple and double separability of a variance–covariance structure
We present modified likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) for simple and double separability of a variance–covariance structure, unbiased in finite samples. The modification is a penalty-based homothetic transformation of the LRT statistic. Optimal penalties, depending on the mean model, contain novel information.
Volume (Year): 83 (2013)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description|
|Order Information:|| Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Mitchell, Matthew W. & Genton, Marc G. & Gumpertz, Marcia L., 2006. "A likelihood ratio test for separability of covariances," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 1025-1043, May.
- Lu, Nelson & Zimmerman, Dale L., 2005. "The likelihood ratio test for a separable covariance matrix," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(4), pages 449-457, July.
- Roy, Anuradha & Leiva, Ricardo, 2008. "Likelihood ratio tests for triply multivariate data with structured correlation on spatial repeated measurements," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(13), pages 1971-1980, September.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:83:y:2013:i:2:p:631-636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.