IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v150y2016icp105-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Score test for a separable covariance structure with the first component as compound symmetric correlation matrix

Author

Listed:
  • Filipiak, Katarzyna
  • Klein, Daniel
  • Roy, Anuradha

Abstract

Likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) for separability of a covariance structure for doubly multivariate data are widely studied in the literature. There are three types of LRT: biased tests based on an asymptotic chi-square null distribution; unbiased/unmodified tests based on an empirical null distribution; and unbiased/modified tests with a test statistic modified to follow a theoretical chi-square null distribution. The Rao’s score test (RST) statistic, an alternative for both biased and unbiased/unmodified versions of the corresponding LRT test statistics, is derived for a common case. In this paper the separability of a covariance structure with the first component as a compound symmetric correlation matrix under the assumption of multivariate normality is tested. For this purpose Monte Carlo simulation studies, which compare the biased LRT to biased RST, and unbiased/unmodified LRT to unbiased/unmodified RST, are conducted. It is shown that the RSTs outperform their corresponding LRTs in the sense of empirical Type I error as well as empirical null distribution. Moreover, since the RST does not require estimation of a general variance–covariance matrix (the alternative hypothesis), RST can be performed for small sample sizes, where the variance–covariance matrix could not be estimated for the corresponding LRT, making the LRT infeasible. Three examples are presented to illustrate and compare statistical inference based on LRT and RST.

Suggested Citation

  • Filipiak, Katarzyna & Klein, Daniel & Roy, Anuradha, 2016. "Score test for a separable covariance structure with the first component as compound symmetric correlation matrix," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 105-124.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:150:y:2016:i:c:p:105-124
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2016.05.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047259X16300379
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sean L. Simpson & Lloyd J. Edwards & Martin A. Styner & Keith E. Muller, 2014. "Separability tests for high-dimensional, low-sample size multivariate repeated measures data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(11), pages 2450-2461, November.
    2. Mitchell, Matthew W. & Genton, Marc G. & Gumpertz, Marcia L., 2006. "A likelihood ratio test for separability of covariances," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 1025-1043, May.
    3. Magnus, Jan R. & Neudecker, H., 1986. "Symmetry, 0-1 Matrices and Jacobians: A Review," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(02), pages 157-190, August.
    4. Engle, Robert F., 1984. "Wald, likelihood ratio, and Lagrange multiplier tests in econometrics," Handbook of Econometrics,in: Z. Griliches† & M. D. Intriligator (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 13, pages 775-826 Elsevier.
    5. Lu, Nelson & Zimmerman, Dale L., 2005. "The likelihood ratio test for a separable covariance matrix," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(4), pages 449-457, July.
    6. Roy, Anuradha & Leiva, Ricardo, 2008. "Likelihood ratio tests for triply multivariate data with structured correlation on spatial repeated measurements," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(13), pages 1971-1980, September.
    7. Magnus, J.R. & Neudecker, H., 1986. "Symmetry, 0-1 matrices and Jacobians : A review," Other publications TiSEM c1c491d0-f2bf-4de1-94f8-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:150:y:2016:i:c:p:105-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.