IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v39y1998i4p347-354.html

Approximation of the Hill estimator process

Author

Listed:
  • Kaufmann, E.
  • Reiss, R. -D.

Abstract

An approximation result for a vector of Hill estimators - in the following addressed as Hill process - is proven. It is shown that the Hill process can be approximated on a suitable probability space by a Wiener process and a deterministic bias term. Moreover, the accuracy of the approximation is, roughly speaking, given by the rate of convergence of a certain term in the Karamata representation of the quantile function.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaufmann, E. & Reiss, R. -D., 1998. "Approximation of the Hill estimator process," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 347-354, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:39:y:1998:i:4:p:347-354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(98)00079-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Drees, Holger & Kaufmann, Edgar, 1998. "Selecting the optimal sample fraction in univariate extreme value estimation," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 149-172, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Holger Drees & Laurens F.M. de Haan & Sidney Resnick, 1998. "How to make a Hill Plot," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-090/4, Tinbergen Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brahimi, Brahim & Meraghni, Djamel & Necir, Abdelhakim & Zitikis, Ričardas, 2011. "Estimating the distortion parameter of the proportional-hazard premium for heavy-tailed losses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 325-334.
    2. Bücher Axel, 2014. "A note on nonparametric estimation of bivariate tail dependence," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 31(2), pages 151-162, June.
    3. Mainik, Georg & Mitov, Georgi & Rüschendorf, Ludger, 2015. "Portfolio optimization for heavy-tailed assets: Extreme Risk Index vs. Markowitz," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 115-134.
    4. Carolina Castaldi & Bart Los, 2008. "The identification of important innovations using tail estimators," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 08-07, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Feb 2008.
    5. Georg Mainik & Georgi Mitov & Ludger Ruschendorf, 2015. "Portfolio optimization for heavy-tailed assets: Extreme Risk Index vs. Markowitz," Papers 1505.04045, arXiv.org.
    6. Raymond Knott & Marco Polenghi, 2006. "Assessing central counterparty margin coverage on futures contracts using GARCH models," Bank of England working papers 287, Bank of England.
    7. Wager, Stefan, 2014. "Subsampling extremes: From block maxima to smooth tail estimation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 335-353.
    8. Liu, Qing & Peng, Liang & Wang, Xing, 2017. "Haezendonck–Goovaerts risk measure with a heavy tailed loss," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 28-47.
    9. Giorgio Fagiolo & Lucia Alessi & Matteo Barigozzi & Marco Capasso, 2010. "On the distributional properties of household consumption expenditures: the case of Italy," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 717-741, June.
    10. Jaap Geluk & Liang Peng & Casper G. de Vries, 1999. "Convolutions of Heavy Tailed Random Variables and Applications to Portfolio Diversification and MA(1) Time Series," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 99-088/2, Tinbergen Institute.
    11. Chao Huang & Jin-Guan Lin & Yan-Yan Ren, 2012. "Statistical Inferences for Generalized Pareto Distribution Based on Interior Penalty Function Algorithm and Bootstrap Methods and Applications in Analyzing Stock Data," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 39(2), pages 173-193, February.
    12. de Valk, Cees, 2016. "A large deviations approach to the statistics of extreme events," Other publications TiSEM 117b3ba0-0e40-4277-b25e-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Danielsson, Jon & Ergun, Lerby M. & Haan, Laurens de & Vries, Casper G. de, 2016. "Tail index estimation: quantile driven threshold selection," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 66193, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Małgorzata Just & Krzysztof Echaust, 2021. "An Optimal Tail Selection in Risk Measurement," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Wagner, Niklas & Marsh, Terry A., 2005. "Measuring tail thickness under GARCH and an application to extreme exchange rate changes," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 165-185, January.
    16. Ergun, Lerby M., 2023. "Extreme downside risk in the cross-section of asset returns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Tsourti, Zoi & Panaretos, John, 2003. "Extreme Value Index Estimators and Smoothing Alternatives: A Critical Review," MPRA Paper 6390, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. M. Ivette Gomes & Armelle Guillou, 2015. "Extreme Value Theory and Statistics of Univariate Extremes: A Review," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 263-292, August.
    19. Rota, Mauro & Schettino, Francesco & Spinesi, Luca, 2017. "Key inventors, teams and firm performance: The Italian case," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 13-25.
    20. Koning, A.J. & Peng, L., 2005. "Goodness-of-fit tests for a heavy tailed distribution," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2005-44, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:39:y:1998:i:4:p:347-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.