IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v382y2025ics0277953625007415.html

Memory biases in problematic social media use: The impact of attachment insecurity

Author

Listed:
  • Bai, Xujia
  • Lan, Chunmei
  • Li, Jiayu
  • Zhou, Yuhong
  • Zhou, Lian
  • Gao, Xuemei

Abstract

Attachment insecurity may intensify the formation of rewarding memory traces associated with social media, potentially driving subsequent social media use in familiar contexts. However, the details of what individuals with problematic social media use (PSMU) remember of social media-related episodes under attachment threat are still largely unknown. The study applied a novel memory task to investigate how attachment threat biases the long-term retrieval of social media-related episodes among at-risk users and to identify which memory aspects predict usage. Results revealed that the acute threat significantly heightened physiological and subjective attachment insecurity and selectively modulated memory retrieval. This modulation reduced access to neutral item memories while enhancing bias toward social media-related associations. Furthermore, enhanced but less detailed memory (i.e., gist memory) for social media-related associations significantly predicted actual social media usage. Trait attachment also influenced memory performance, with attachment anxiety and avoidance predicting different aspects of gist memory performance. These findings advance understanding of the cognitive processes connecting insecure attachment with PSMU and highlight the significance of considering individual differences in attachment when developing prevention and intervention strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Bai, Xujia & Lan, Chunmei & Li, Jiayu & Zhou, Yuhong & Zhou, Lian & Gao, Xuemei, 2025. "Memory biases in problematic social media use: The impact of attachment insecurity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007415
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625007415
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laor, Tal, 2022. "My social network: Group differences in frequency of use, active use, and interactive use on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fosch-Villaronga, Eduard & Mut-Piña, Antoni & Verhoef, Tessa & Poulsen, Adam & Søraa, Roger A. & Custers, Bart, 2026. "Misgendering algorithms: Insights from a cross-sectional survey on algorithmic gender classification in social media," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Thompson, Jamie & Igarashi, Reika & Krowinska, Agata & Logan-McFarlane, Ashleigh, 2025. "Is it real or not? construction of meaning and identity in virtual influencer marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    3. Dagmar Cagáňová & Natália Horňáková & Marcela Galovská & Roman Hruška, 2024. "Willingness to Keep or to Give Up the Social Media for a Certain Monetary Compensation," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 13, January.
    4. Michael Beier & Katrin Schillo, 2026. "Sources of restaurant recommendations: how consumers in Germany and Switzerland perceive their importance in known and unknown areas," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 1-29, June.
    5. Akbari, Morteza & Foroudi, Pantea & Zaman Fashami, Rahime & Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Khodayari, Maryam, 2022. "Let us talk about something: The evolution of e-WOM from the past to the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 663-689.
    6. Polyzos, Efstathios & Fotiadis, Anestis & Huan, Tzung-Cheng, 2023. "From Heroes to Scoundrels: Exploring the effects of online campaigns celebrating frontline workers on COVID-19 outcomes," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Pathak, Atul Arun & Kaushik, Kapil, 2024. "Driving consumer engagement for digital payment brands: Content strategy on instagram," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.