IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v382y2025ics0277953625007415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Memory biases in problematic social media use: The impact of attachment insecurity

Author

Listed:
  • Bai, Xujia
  • Lan, Chunmei
  • Li, Jiayu
  • Zhou, Yuhong
  • Zhou, Lian
  • Gao, Xuemei

Abstract

Attachment insecurity may intensify the formation of rewarding memory traces associated with social media, potentially driving subsequent social media use in familiar contexts. However, the details of what individuals with problematic social media use (PSMU) remember of social media-related episodes under attachment threat are still largely unknown. The study applied a novel memory task to investigate how attachment threat biases the long-term retrieval of social media-related episodes among at-risk users and to identify which memory aspects predict usage. Results revealed that the acute threat significantly heightened physiological and subjective attachment insecurity and selectively modulated memory retrieval. This modulation reduced access to neutral item memories while enhancing bias toward social media-related associations. Furthermore, enhanced but less detailed memory (i.e., gist memory) for social media-related associations significantly predicted actual social media usage. Trait attachment also influenced memory performance, with attachment anxiety and avoidance predicting different aspects of gist memory performance. These findings advance understanding of the cognitive processes connecting insecure attachment with PSMU and highlight the significance of considering individual differences in attachment when developing prevention and intervention strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Bai, Xujia & Lan, Chunmei & Li, Jiayu & Zhou, Yuhong & Zhou, Lian & Gao, Xuemei, 2025. "Memory biases in problematic social media use: The impact of attachment insecurity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007415
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625007415
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625007415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.