IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v372y2025ics0277953625002370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family participation in geriatric decision-making: Marginalization of older patients’ autonomy in Chinese outpatient consultation

Author

Listed:
  • Yan, Tianxin
  • Yang, Min

Abstract

Family participation is regarded as crucial for promoting patient well-being, particularly in geriatric care, where patients often face greater challenges and require additional support in making medical decisions. The importance of family participation is frequently framed within a cultural context that acknowledges differing conceptions of autonomy. However, it remains unclear how family members are actually prompted or discouraged in their participation in medical decision-making. This article aims to identify the interactional patterns of decision-making during accompanied geriatric consultations and to examine the underlying mechanisms shaping these dynamics. Focusing on audio recordings of 86 geriatric encounters, the mixed-method study identified four decision-making patterns through nuanced Conversation Analysis: direct family surrogation, substitute family surrogation, and patient-centered collaboration. A subsequent quantitative analysis was conducted to explore factors influencing these decision-making patterns, in which the identity of the companion emerged as a key factor shaping interactional dynamics, with adult children being significantly more likely to assume a surrogate role than spouses. These findings are discussed in the context of the broader social structure of elder care and the institutional constraints present in the Chinese medical system. This study emphasizes the need for caution in overemphasizing cultural characteristics, as doing so risks systematically marginalizing the social agency and self-efficacy of older adults. We call for greater efforts to ensure the meaningful participation of older individuals in healthcare decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan, Tianxin & Yang, Min, 2025. "Family participation in geriatric decision-making: Marginalization of older patients’ autonomy in Chinese outpatient consultation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:372:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625002370
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625002370
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117908?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clayman, Marla L. & Roter, Debra & Wissow, Lawrence S. & Bandeen-Roche, Karen, 2005. "Autonomy-related behaviors of patient companions and their effect on decision-making activity in geriatric primary care visits," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 1583-1591, April.
    2. Ishikawa, Hirono & Roter, Debra L. & Yamazaki, Yoshihiko & Takayama, Tomoko, 2005. "Physician-elderly patient-companion communication and roles of companions in Japanese geriatric encounters," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(10), pages 2307-2320, May.
    3. Zhang, Shuai & Cheng, Meili & Ma, Wen & Liu, Huashui & Zhao, Chunjuan, 2023. "Companion responses to diagnosis in Chinese outpatient clinical interaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    4. Wolff, Jennifer L. & Roter, Debra L., 2011. "Family presence in routine medical visits: A meta-analytical review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(6), pages 823-831, March.
    5. Zhang, Yanan & Harper, Sarah, 2022. "The impact of son or daughter care on Chinese older adults' mental health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Shuai & Cheng, Meili & Ma, Wen & Liu, Huashui & Zhao, Chunjuan, 2023. "Companion responses to diagnosis in Chinese outpatient clinical interaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    2. Blair, Thomas R.W., 2012. "“Community ambassadors” for South Asian elder immigrants: Late-life acculturation and the roles of community health workers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(10), pages 1769-1777.
    3. Wolff, Jennifer L. & Roter, Debra L., 2011. "Family presence in routine medical visits: A meta-analytical review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(6), pages 823-831, March.
    4. Marla L. Clayman & Carma L. Bylund & Betty Chewning & Gregory Makoul, 2016. "The Impact of Patient Participation in Health Decisions Within Medical Encounters," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 36(4), pages 427-452, May.
    5. Huang, Nicole & Chou, Yiing-Jenq & Hu, Hsiao-Yun & Lee, Cheng-Hua, 2013. "Gender disparities in AMI management and outcomes among health professionals, their relatives, and non-health professionals in Taiwan from 1997 to 2007," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-74.
    6. Rooks, Ronica N. & Wiltshire, Jacqueline C. & Elder, Keith & BeLue, Rhonda & Gary, Lisa C., 2012. "Health information seeking and use outside of the medical encounter: Is it associated with race and ethnicity?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 176-184.
    7. Eggly, Susan & Penner, Louis A. & Greene, Meredith & Harper, Felicity W.K. & Ruckdeschel, John C. & Albrecht, Terrance L., 2006. "Information seeking during "bad news" oncology interactions: Question asking by patients and their companions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 2974-2985, December.
    8. Sha Fan & Renuka Mahadevan, 2024. "How Important is Optimism for Mental Health? A Spatial Temporal Life Course Analysis on Indonesia," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 19(1), pages 135-154, February.
    9. Rötzmeier-Keuper, Julia & Hendricks (née Lerch), Jennifer & Wünderlich, Nancy V. & Schmitz, Gertrud, 2018. "Triadic relationships in the context of services for animal companions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 295-303.
    10. Lei Lei & Fengyu Wu & Yiming Xia, 2023. "Child Gender and Subjective Well-Being of Older Parents in China," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 2473-2497, December.
    11. Hilke Brockmann, 2012. "Ungesunde Verhältnisse?: Eine Längsschnittanalyse zur Gesundheit von Kindern in zusammen- und getrenntlebenden Familien," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 503, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    12. repec:plo:pone00:0212967 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Wei, Wan, 2024. "Beyond the patient-doctor dyad: Examining “other” patient engagement in Traditional Chinese Medicine consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    14. Chih-Yen Chang & Shou-Jen Lan & Chiao-Lee Chu & Ching-Sung Ho, 2021. "The Relationship between Clinic Visit Accompanied by Family and Dementia Severity in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-9, February.
    15. Duberstein, Paul R. & Hoerger, Michael & Norton, Sally A. & Mohile, Supriya & Dahlberg, Britt & Hyatt, Erica Goldblatt & Epstein, Ronald M. & Wittink, Marsha N., 2023. "The TRIBE model: How socioemotional processes fuel end-of-life treatment in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:372:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625002370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.