IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v368y2025ics0277953625001595.html

The sociology of prescribing: A narrative review and agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Smith, Anthony K J.

Abstract

Prescribing is a key symbol of the authority of medical practice, and is restricted to qualified clinicians who permit access to many medicines. Variously framed as over- or under-prescribed, or otherwise inadequately provisioned, sociologists have attended to the clinical logics and practices underpinning prescribing. Despite being a key feature in medical practice, there is only scattered attention to a ‘sociology of prescribing’ or a general social theory of prescribing. In contrast, there has been a flourishing sociology of diagnosis in recent decades that organises the field. Revisiting a nascent sociology of prescribing that emerged in the 1970s, this article reviews sociological (and other social scientific) contributions to prescribing and provides an agenda for a contemporary approach to sociological perspectives on drug prescribing. A sociology of prescribing conceptualises the act of prescribing as an embodied and relational social practice shaped through the complex choreographies of health encounters and systems. Early prescribing literature documented variations in prescribing practices across clinical sites, attended to the divergent expectations of the prescription between doctor and patient, and characterised prescribing as symbolically potent, enabling the doctor to alleviate, validate, and placate patient concerns. While health industries understand prescribing as a technical process of following the mandates of ethics and evidence-based medicine (or ‘rational prescribing’), social research has identified pharmaceutical detailing, workplace cultures, and practice-relevant knowledge as key determinants of prescribing practice. Recent sociological inquiry has also focused on professional tensions with the expansion of non-medical prescribing, critiques of the (bio)medicalisation and pharmaceuticalisation of society, and the impacts of new technologies like electronic prescribing. I propose care, expertise, power, and work as domains for future sociological inquiry on prescribing. Attending to these domains will be vital as prescribing is continually reimagined through transformations in the technological and political arrangements of pharmaceuticals and healthcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith, Anthony K J., 2025. "The sociology of prescribing: A narrative review and agenda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:368:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625001595
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625001595
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117830?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salhani, Daniel & Coulter, Ian, 2009. "The politics of interprofessional working and the struggle for professional autonomy in nursing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1221-1228, April.
    2. Petrakaki, Dimitra & Hilberg, Eva & Waring, Justin, 2021. "The Cultivation of Digital Health Citizenship," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Ceuterick, Melissa & Van Ngoc, Pauline & Bracke, Piet & Scholtes, Beatrice, 2023. "From prescribing dilemma to knowledge in practice: The ontological politics of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    4. Henriksen, Kristin & Hansen, Ebba Holme, 2004. "The threatened self: general practitioners' self-perception in relation to prescribing medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 47-55, July.
    5. Sleath, Betsy & Tina Shih, Ya-Chen, 2003. "Sociological influences on antidepressant prescribing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1335-1344, March.
    6. Schwartz, Rebecca K. & Soumerai, Stephen B. & Avorn, Jerry, 1989. "Physician motivations for nonscientific drug prescribing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 577-582, January.
    7. Rhodes, Tim & Lancaster, Kari, 2019. "Evidence-making interventions in health: A conceptual framing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Wadmann, Sarah & Bang, Lia E., 2015. "Rationalising prescribing: Evidence, marketing and practice-relevant knowledge," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 109-116.
    9. Broom, Alex & Broom, Jennifer & Kirby, Emma, 2014. "Cultures of resistance? A Bourdieusian analysis of doctors' antibiotic prescribing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 81-88.
    10. Prosser, Helen & Walley, Tom, 2006. "New drug prescribing by hospital doctors: The nature and meaning of knowledge," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 1565-1578, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0092938 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Lin, Shu-Jou & Jan, Kuan-An & Kao, Jen-Tse, 2011. "Colleague interactions and new drug prescribing behavior: The case of the initial prescription of antidepressants in Taiwanese medical centers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(8), pages 1208-1213.
    3. Mamas Theodorou & Antonis Kontemeniotis & Marios Kantaris & Antonis Farmakas, 2022. "Disentangling prescribing behaviour of Cypriot physicians, within a complex framework of interacting," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 2410-2420, July.
    4. Shi, Runyu & Petrakaki, Dimitra, 2026. "User-AI intimacy in digital health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 389(C).
    5. Katolik, Aleksandra & Oswald, Andrew J., 2017. "Antidepressants for Economists and Business-School Researchers: An Introduction and Review," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 338, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    6. Blanchflower, David G. & Oswald, Andrew J., 2011. "Antidepressants and Age," IZA Discussion Papers 5785, IZA Network @ LISER.
    7. Gautham, Meenakshi & Spicer, Neil & Chatterjee, Soumyadip & Goodman, Catherine, 2021. "What are the challenges for antibiotic stewardship at the community level? An analysis of the drivers of antibiotic provision by informal healthcare providers in rural India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    8. Rubeis, Giovanni, 2023. "Liquid Health. Medicine in the age of surveillance capitalism," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    9. Stefan Stremersch & Vardit Landsman & Sriram Venkataraman, 2013. "The Relationship Between DTCA, Drug Requests, and Prescriptions: Uncovering Variation in Specialty and Space," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 89-110, June.
    10. Auer, Christian & Lagahid, Jaime Y. & Tanner, Marcel & Weiss, Mitchell G., 2006. "Diagnosis and management of tuberculosis by private practitioners in Manila, Philippines," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 172-181, July.
    11. Maron, Piotr, 2025. "Making disordered bodies in the context of male eating disorders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
    12. Traynor, Michael & Boland, Maggie & Buus, Niels, 2010. "Professional autonomy in 21st century healthcare: Nurses' accounts of clinical decision-making," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(8), pages 1506-1512, October.
    13. Pitaknetinan, Kitti & Tangcharoensathien, Viroj & Supachutikul, Anuwat & Bennett, Sara & Mills, Anne, 1999. "Profit, payment and pharmaceutical practices: perspectives from hospitals in Bangkok," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 179-194, March.
    14. Broom, Alex & Kenny, Katherine & Kirby, Emma & Davis, Mark & Dodds, Susan & Post, Jeffrey & Broom, Jennifer, 2021. "The modern hospital executive, micro improvements, and the rise of antimicrobial resistance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    15. Bradley, Eleanor & Hynam, Brian & Nolan, Peter, 2007. "Nurse prescribing: Reflections on safety in practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 599-609, August.
    16. Aaron Martin & Timothy B Gravelle & Erik Baekkeskov & Jenny Lewis & Yoshi Kashima, 2019. "Enlisting the support of trusted sources to tackle policy problems: The case of antimicrobial resistance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-9, March.
    17. Powell, Alison E. & Davies, Huw T.O., 2012. "The struggle to improve patient care in the face of professional boundaries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(5), pages 807-814.
    18. Broom, Alex & Broom, Jennifer & Kirby, Emma & Scambler, Graham, 2015. "The path of least resistance? Jurisdictions, responsibility and professional asymmetries in pharmacists' accounts of antibiotic decisions in hospitals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 95-103.
    19. Kuijper, Syb & Felder, Martijn & Clegg, Stewart & Bal, Roland & Wallenburg, Iris, 2024. "“We don't experiment with our patients!” An ethnographic account of the epistemic politics of (re)designing nursing work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    20. Herzog, Dalia & Trendelenburg, Florian, 2024. "Omni-Channel- Marketing in der Pharma-Industrie: Aktuelle strategische Herausforderungen und Lösungsansätze bei der Konzeptualisierung und Implementierung von Omni-Channel-Marketingstrategien," Marketing Review St.Gallen, Universität St.Gallen, Institut für Marketing und Customer Insight, vol. 41(6), pages 46-58.
    21. Steve Connelly & Dave Vanderhoven & Robert Rutherfoord & Liz Richardson & Peter Matthews, 2021. "Translating research for policy: the importance of equivalence, function, and loyalty," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:368:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625001595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.