IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v95y2024ics0038012124001988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can cycling compensate the distributional inequity of public service facilities? Evidence from Shenzhen, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Conghui
  • Chen, Jiangyan

Abstract

Most traditional studies measure accessible equity of public service facilities (PSFs) statically, and tend to neglect travelling scope disparities among people with different travelling abilities and conditions. This study offers a new perspective for dynamically assessing the actual occupancy of PSFs from both the provision and demand sides. Taking Shenzhen as an example, and employing big data on shared-bike orders, we explored the compensation mechanism of cycling for the distributional inequity of PSFs, with a two-phase measurement framework. First, the Gini index and Lorenz curve were adopted to compare the distributional equality of the grids’ originally-allocated PSFs (based on the division of block-scale grids) and their cycling-accessed PSFs (based on delineation of the cycling scope with shared-bike orders). Second, a spatial lag model was established to reveal the exact factors affecting the ability to improve the PSF occupancy through cycling. The results showed that cycling compensated the distributional inequity of PSFs. This compensation effect varied among groups of different ages, genders, and incomes. Moreover, mixed land use and the low density of trunk roads promoted this compensation. These findings can provide decision-makers with references for future PSF planning in Shenzhen, and other similar cities worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Conghui & Chen, Jiangyan, 2024. "Can cycling compensate the distributional inequity of public service facilities? Evidence from Shenzhen, China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:95:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124001988
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2024.101999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124001988
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahul Goel & Anna Goodman & Rachel Aldred & Ryota Nakamura & Lambed Tatah & Leandro Martin Totaro Garcia & Belen Zapata-Diomedi & Thiago Herick de Sa & Geetam Tiwari & Audrey de Nazelle & Marko Tainio, 2022. "Cycling behaviour in 17 countries across 6 continents: levels of cycling, who cycles, for what purpose, and how far?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 58-81, January.
    2. Kelobonye, Keone & McCarney, Gary & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia) & Swapan, Mohammad Shahidul Hasan & Mao, Feng & Zhou, Heng, 2019. "Relative accessibility analysis for key land uses: A spatial equity perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 82-93.
    3. Hansen, Karsten Bruun & Nielsen, Thomas Alexander Sick, 2014. "Exploring characteristics and motives of long distance commuter cyclists," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 57-63.
    4. Prati, Gabriele, 2018. "Gender equality and women's participation in transport cycling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 369-375.
    5. Martin Dijst & Martin Lanzendorf & Angela Barendregt & Leo Smit, 2005. "Second Homes In Germany And The Netherlands: Ownership And Travel Impact Explained," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 96(2), pages 139-152, April.
    6. Zhu, Jing & Fan, Yingling, 2018. "Daily travel behavior and emotional well-being: Effects of trip mode, duration, purpose, and companionship," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 360-373.
    7. Quanyi Zheng & Xiaolong Zhao & Mengxiao Jin, 2019. "Research on Urban Public Green Space Planning Based on Taxi Data: A Case Study on Three Districts of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Chen, Yulin, 2019. "Neighborhood form and residents' walking and biking distance to food markets: Evidence from Beijing, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 340-349.
    9. Mengwei Chen & Dianhai Wang & Yilin Sun & E. Owen D. Waygood & Wentao Yang, 2020. "A comparison of users’ characteristics between station-based bikesharing system and free-floating bikesharing system: case study in Hangzhou, China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 689-704, April.
    10. Rachel Aldred & James Woodcock & Anna Goodman, 2016. "Does More Cycling Mean More Diversity in Cycling?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 28-44, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Echeverría, Lucía & Giménez-Nadal, J. Ignacio & Alberto Molina, José, 2022. "Who uses green mobility? Exploring profiles in developed countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 247-265.
    2. Lopes, Miguel & Mélice Dias, Ana & Silva, Cecília, 2021. "The impact of urban features in cycling potential – A tale of Portuguese cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Agrawal, Srishti & Seth, Adit & Goel, Rahul, 2024. "A silent revolution: Rapid rise of cycling to school in rural India," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. José Ignacio Giménez-Nadal & Lucía Echeverría & Alberto Molina, 2023. "Citizen security and urban commuting in Latin America," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(13), pages 2585-2611, October.
    5. Giacomantonio, Sarah & Mitra, Raktim & Ravensbergen, Léa, 2024. "Bicycle facilities and women's cycling frequency – An intersectional analysis of gendered travel behaviour," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    6. Le, Huyen T.K. & Buehler, Ralph & Fan, Yingling & Hankey, Steve, 2020. "Expanding the positive utility of travel through weeklong tracking: Within-person and multi-environment variability of ideal travel time," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Sarker, Rumana Islam & Kaplan, Sigal & Mailer, Markus & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2019. "Applying affective event theory to explain transit users’ reactions to service disruptions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 593-605.
    8. Timmons, Shane & Andersson, Ylva & McGowan, Féidhlim & Lunn, Pete, 2023. "Using behavioural science to design and implement active travel infrastructure: A narrative review of evidence," Papers WP745, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    9. Anowar, Sabreena & Eluru, Naveen & Hatzopoulou, Marianne, 2017. "Quantifying the value of a clean ride: How far would you bicycle to avoid exposure to traffic-related air pollution?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 66-78.
    10. Mariano J. Rabassa & Mariana Conte Grand & Christian M. García-Witulski, 2021. "Heat warnings and avoidance behavior: evidence from a bike-sharing system," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(1), pages 1-28, January.
    11. Jiankun Yang & Min He & Mingwei He, 2022. "Exploring the Group Difference in the Nonlinear Relationship between Commuting Satisfaction and Commuting Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Hamid Mostofi & Houshmand Masoumi & Hans-Liudger Dienel, 2020. "The Association between the Regular Use of ICT Based Mobility Services and the Bicycle Mode Choice in Tehran and Cairo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Hong Leng & Bingbing Han, 2022. "Effect of Environmental Planning on Elderly Individual Quality of Life in Severe Cold Regions: A Case Study in Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    14. repec:osf:socarx:dj8av_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Hudde, Ansgar, 2022. "The unequal cycling boom in Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    16. Echeverría, Lucía & Gimenez-Nadal, J. Ignacio & Molina, José Alberto, 2021. "Carpooling: User profiles and well-being," Nülan. Deposited Documents 3568, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    17. Ye, Runing & De Vos, Jonas & Ma, Liang, 2020. "Analysing the association of dissonance between actual and ideal commute time and commute satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 47-60.
    18. Meihan Jin & Lu Liu & De Tong & Yongxi Gong & Yu Liu, 2019. "Evaluating the Spatial Accessibility and Distribution Balance of Multi-Level Medical Service Facilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Stefansky, Andreas & Göb, Angelina (ed.), 2018. ""Bitte wenden Sie!" - Herausforderungen und Chancen der Energiewende [“Please make the transition!” - Challenges to and opportunities for the energy transition]," Arbeitsberichte der ARL, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, volume 22, number 22, September.
    20. Echeverría, Lucía & Gimenez-Nadal, J. Ignacio & Molina, José Alberto, 2022. "Green mobility and well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    21. Jie Sheng & Zhenhai Xiang & Pengfei Ban & Chuang Bao, 2024. "How Does the Urban Built Environment Affect the Accessibility of Public Electric-Vehicle Charging Stations? A Perspective on Spatial Heterogeneity and a Non-Linear Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:95:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124001988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.