IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v64y2023ics0275531922002550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A sparsity algorithm for finding optimal counterfactual explanations: Application to corporate credit rating

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Dan
  • Chen, Zhi
  • Florescu, Ionuţ
  • Wen, Bingyang

Abstract

Machine learning methods used in finance for corporate credit rating lack transparency as to which accounting features are important for the respective rating. A counterfactual explanation is a methodology that attempts to find the smallest modification of the input values which changes the prediction of a learned algorithm to a new output, other than the original one. We propose a “sparsity algorithm” which finds a counterfactual explanation to find the most important features for obtaining a higher credit score. We validate the novel algorithm with synthetically generated data and we apply it to quarterly financial statements from companies in the US market. We provide evidence that the counterfactual explanation can capture the majority of features that change between two quarters when corporate ratings improve. The results obtained show that the higher the rating of a company, the greater the “effort” required to further improve credit rating.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Dan & Chen, Zhi & Florescu, Ionuţ & Wen, Bingyang, 2023. "A sparsity algorithm for finding optimal counterfactual explanations: Application to corporate credit rating," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:64:y:2023:i:c:s0275531922002550
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531922002550
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101869?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parisa Golbayani & Ionuc{t} Florescu & Rupak Chatterjee, 2020. "A comparative study of forecasting Corporate Credit Ratings using Neural Networks, Support Vector Machines, and Decision Trees," Papers 2007.06617, arXiv.org.
    2. Parisa Golbayani & Dan Wang & Ionut Florescu, 2020. "Application of Deep Neural Networks to assess corporate Credit Rating," Papers 2003.02334, arXiv.org.
    3. Shamima Ahmed & Muneer Alshater & Anis El Ammari & Helmi Hammami, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: A bibliometric review," Post-Print hal-03697290, HAL.
    4. Burggraf, Tobias, 2021. "Beyond risk parity – A machine learning-based hierarchical risk parity approach on cryptocurrencies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    5. Ahmed, Shamima & Alshater, Muneer M. & Ammari, Anis El & Hammami, Helmi, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: A bibliometric review," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    6. Gunnarsson, Björn Rafn & vanden Broucke, Seppe & Baesens, Bart & Óskarsdóttir, María & Lemahieu, Wilfried, 2021. "Deep learning for credit scoring: Do or don’t?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 292-305.
    7. Le, Hong Hanh & Viviani, Jean-Laurent, 2018. "Predicting bank failure: An improvement by implementing a machine-learning approach to classical financial ratios," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 16-25.
    8. Duan, Yuejiao & Goodell, John W. & Li, Haoran & Li, Xinming, 2022. "Assessing machine learning for forecasting economic risk: Evidence from an expanded Chinese financial information set," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PA).
    9. Hang Luo & Linfeng Chen, 2019. "Bond yield and credit rating: evidence of Chinese local government financing vehicles," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 737-758, April.
    10. Liu, Yi & Yang, Menglong & Wang, Yudong & Li, Yongshan & Xiong, Tiancheng & Li, Anzhe, 2022. "Applying machine learning algorithms to predict default probability in the online credit market: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Golbayani, Parisa & Florescu, Ionuţ & Chatterjee, Rupak, 2020. "A comparative study of forecasting corporate credit ratings using neural networks, support vector machines, and decision trees," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Satyam Kumar & Yelleti Vivek & Vadlamani Ravi & Indranil Bose, 2023. "Causal Inference for Banking Finance and Insurance A Survey," Papers 2307.16427, arXiv.org.
    2. Chen, Dangxing & Ye, Jiahui & Ye, Weicheng, 2023. "Interpretable selective learning in credit risk," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan Wang & Zhi Chen & Ionut Florescu, 2021. "A Sparsity Algorithm with Applications to Corporate Credit Rating," Papers 2107.10306, arXiv.org.
    2. Chen, Dangxing & Ye, Jiahui & Ye, Weicheng, 2023. "Interpretable selective learning in credit risk," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Kim, Jong-Min & Kim, Dong H. & Jung, Hojin, 2021. "Applications of machine learning for corporate bond yield spread forecasting," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Shenghuan Yang & lonut Florescu & Md Tariqul Islam, 2020. "Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis for Feature Selection in Credit Rating," Papers 2011.09137, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    5. Bojing Feng & Wenfang Xue & Bindang Xue & Zeyu Liu, 2020. "Every Corporation Owns Its Image: Corporate Credit Ratings via Convolutional Neural Networks," Papers 2012.03744, arXiv.org.
    6. Awijen, Haithem & Ben Zaied, Younes & Ben Lahouel, Béchir & Khlifi, Foued, 2023. "Machine learning for US cross-industry return predictability under information uncertainty," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. HUO, Peng & WANG, Luxin, 2022. "Digital economy and business investment efficiency: Inhibiting or facilitating?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Oliveira, Alexandre Silva de & Ceretta, Paulo Sergio & Albrecht, Peter, 2023. "Performance comparison of multifractal techniques and artificial neural networks in the construction of investment portfolios," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    9. María Jesús Segovia‐Vargas & I. Marta Miranda‐García & Freddy Alejandro Oquendo‐Torres, 2023. "Sustainable finance: The role of savings and credit cooperatives in Ecuador," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 951-980, September.
    10. Yu, Baojun & Li, Changming & Mirza, Nawazish & Umar, Muhammad, 2022. "Forecasting credit ratings of decarbonized firms: Comparative assessment of machine learning models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Bolívar, Fernando & Duran, Miguel A. & Lozano-Vivas, Ana, 2023. "Business model contributions to bank profit performance: A machine learning approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Goodell, John W. & Oriani, Marco Ercole & Paltrinieri, Andrea & Patel, Ritesh, 2023. "The importance of ABS 2 journals in finance scholarship: Evidence from a bibliometric case study," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    13. González, Marta Ramos & Ureña, Antonio Partal & Fernández-Aguado, Pilar Gómez, 2023. "Forecasting for regulatory credit loss derived from the COVID-19 pandemic: A machine learning approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Koresh Galil & Ami Hauptman & Rosit Levy Rosenboim, 2023. "Prediction of Corporate Credit Ratings with Machine Learning: Simple Interpretative Models," Working Papers 2308, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    15. Seyyide Doğan & Yasin Büyükkör & Murat Atan, 2022. "A comparative study of corporate credit ratings prediction with machine learning," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 32(1), pages 25-47.
    16. Costola, Michele & Hinz, Oliver & Nofer, Michael & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2023. "Machine learning sentiment analysis, COVID-19 news and stock market reactions," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    17. Yasmeen Ansari & Mansour Saleh Albarrak & Noorjahan Sherfudeen & Arfia Aman, 2022. "A Study of Financial Literacy of Investors—A Bibliometric Analysis," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Ren, Yi-Shuai & Ma, Chao-Qun & Kong, Xiao-Lin & Baltas, Konstantinos & Zureigat, Qasim, 2022. "Past, present, and future of the application of machine learning in cryptocurrency research," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    19. Gupta, Somya & Ghardallou, Wafa & Pandey, Dharen Kumar & Sahu, Ganesh P., 2022. "Artificial intelligence adoption in the insurance industry: Evidence using the technology–organization–environment framework," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Dan Wang & Tianrui Wang & Ionuc{t} Florescu, 2020. "Is Image Encoding Beneficial for Deep Learning in Finance? An Analysis of Image Encoding Methods for the Application of Convolutional Neural Networks in Finance," Papers 2010.08698, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Credit rating; Machine learning; Counterfactual explanation; Sparsity algorithm; Explainable AI;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:64:y:2023:i:c:s0275531922002550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.