IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v167y2022ics1364032122006177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of a cogeneration system for ceramic industry by using various exergy based economic approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Caglayan, Hasan
  • Caliskan, Hakan

Abstract

This study presents various exergy based economic analyses of a gas turbine cogeneration system (COGEN) for a ceramic tile plant for five different reference environment temperatures. Specific Exergy Costing (SPECO) method, which uses fuel-product exergy approach and flow costs, and Exergy-Cost-Energy-Mass (EXCEM) method, which considers exergy loss and destruction with cost association, are used. It has been found that the irreversibilities due to chemical combustion reactions, occurring in the combustion chamber (CC) of the gas turbine unit, wall tile (WD) dryer and ground tile dryer (GD), have negative effects for the destructed exergy cost rate of themselves and overall system. In addition, depending on the destructed exergy cost ratio, the exergy based economic factor rates of these components are found to be lower than others. While the increase of the COGEN's and all of its components' destructed exergy cost rates are direct proportionally to the increase in the environment temperature, they are inversely proportional to the exergy based economic factor. As a result of the SPECO method, in the EXCEM method, the exergy cost parameters of the CC are much higher than the other components at all reference environment temperatures because of the high destructed exergy value of the CC. The system needs to be optimized in terms of eliminating the irreversibilities encountered intensively in the components such as CC, WD, GD. Consequently, these results show that the focus should be on the CC first, then on the WD and GD.

Suggested Citation

  • Caglayan, Hasan & Caliskan, Hakan, 2022. "Assessment of a cogeneration system for ceramic industry by using various exergy based economic approaches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:167:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122006177
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122006177
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haydargil, Derya & Abuşoğlu, Ayşegül, 2018. "A comparative thermoeconomic cost accounting analysis and evaluation of biogas engine-powered cogeneration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 97-114.
    2. Penkuhn, Mathias & Tsatsaronis, George, 2017. "Comparison of different ammonia synthesis loop configurations with the aid of advanced exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 854-864.
    3. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Tsatsaronis, George, 2006. "SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1257-1289.
    4. Mert, Mehmet Selçuk & Dilmaç, Ömer Faruk & Özkan, Semra & Karaca, Fatma & Bolat, Esen, 2012. "Exergoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration plant in an iron and steel factory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 78-84.
    5. Abdelaziz, E.A. & Saidur, R. & Mekhilef, S., 2011. "A review on energy saving strategies in industrial sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 150-168, January.
    6. Caglayan, Hasan & Caliskan, Hakan, 2017. "Sustainability assessment of heat exchanger units for spray dryers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 741-751.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Alessandra Ancona & Lisa Branchini & Saverio Ottaviano & Maria Chiara Bignozzi & Benedetta Ferrari & Barbara Mazzanti & Marcello Salvio & Claudia Toro & Fabrizio Martini & Miriam Benedetti, 2022. "Energy and Environmental Assessment of Cogeneration in Ceramic Tiles Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Gunerhan, Ali & Altuntas, Onder & Caliskan, Hakan, 2023. "Utilization of renewable and sustainable aviation biofuels from waste tyres for sustainable aviation transport sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caglayan, Hasan & Caliskan, Hakan, 2021. "Advanced exergy analyses and optimization of a cogeneration system for ceramic industry by considering endogenous, exogenous, avoidable and unavoidable exergies under different environmental condition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Uysal, Cuneyt & Keçebaş, Ali, 2021. "Advanced exergoeconomic analysis with using modified productive structure analysis: An application for a real gas turbine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Aghaei, Ali Tavakkol & Saray, Rahim Khoshbakhti, 2021. "Optimization of a combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system with a gas turbine prime mover: A case study in the dairy industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    4. Mohammadkhani, F. & Shokati, N. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Yari, M. & Rosen, M.A., 2014. "Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 533-543.
    5. Gürtürk, Mert & Oztop, Hakan F. & Hepbasli, Arif, 2015. "Comparison of exergoeconomic analysis of two different perlite expansion furnaces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 589-598.
    6. Agudelo, Andrés & Valero, Antonio & Torres, César, 2012. "Allocation of waste cost in thermoeconomic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 634-643.
    7. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng & Cao, Liyan & Wang, Yu, 2016. "Comprehensive analysis and parametric optimization of a CCP (combined cooling and power) system driven by geothermal source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 470-487.
    8. Olusegun David Samuel & Peter A. Aigba & Thien Khanh Tran & H. Fayaz & Carlo Pastore & Oguzhan Der & Ali Erçetin & Christopher C. Enweremadu & Ahmad Mustafa, 2023. "Comparison of the Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment of Hydrodynamic Cavitation and Mechanical Stirring Reactors for the Production of Sustainable Hevea brasiliensis Ethyl Ester," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-27, November.
    9. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Mohsen Sadeghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2022. "Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    10. Sauer, Ildo L. & Tatizawa, Hédio & Salotti, Francisco A.M. & Mercedes, Sonia S., 2015. "A comparative assessment of Brazilian electric motors performance with minimum efficiency standards," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 308-318.
    11. Oyekale, Joseph & Petrollese, Mario & Cau, Giorgio, 2020. "Modified auxiliary exergy costing in advanced exergoeconomic analysis applied to a hybrid solar-biomass organic Rankine cycle plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Meyabadi, A. Fattahi & Deihimi, M.H., 2017. "A review of demand-side management: Reconsidering theoretical framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 367-379.
    13. Roque Díaz, P. & Benito, Y.R. & Parise, J.A.R., 2010. "Thermoeconomic assessment of a multi-engine, multi-heat-pump CCHP (combined cooling, heating and power generation) system – A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 3540-3550.
    14. Schlomann, Barbara & Schleich, Joachim, 2015. "Adoption of low-cost energy efficiency measures in the tertiary sector—An empirical analysis based on energy survey data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1127-1133.
    15. Wang, Zhen & Duan, Liqiang & Zhang, Zuxian, 2022. "Multi-objective optimization of gas turbine combined cycle system considering environmental damage cost of pollution emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    16. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    17. Santhanam, S. & Heddrich, M.P. & Riedel, M. & Friedrich, K.A., 2017. "Theoretical and experimental study of Reversible Solid Oxide Cell (r-SOC) systems for energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 202-214.
    18. Raúl Arango-Miranda & Robert Hausler & Rabindranarth Romero-López & Mathias Glaus & Sara Patricia Ibarra-Zavaleta, 2018. "An Overview of Energy and Exergy Analysis to the Industrial Sector, a Contribution to Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    19. Kong, Lingbo & Price, Lynn & Hasanbeigi, Ali & Liu, Huanbin & Li, Jigeng, 2013. "Potential for reducing paper mill energy use and carbon dioxide emissions through plant-wide energy audits: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1334-1342.
    20. Ouyang, Xiaoling & Lin, Boqiang, 2015. "An analysis of the driving forces of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in China’s industrial sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 838-849.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:167:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122006177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.