IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v72y2014icp12-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the potential for energy extraction from turbines in the gulf stream system

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Xiufeng
  • Haas, Kevin A.
  • Fritz, Hermann M.

Abstract

Increasing energy consumption and decreasing reserves of fossil fuels have led to growing interest in renewable energy from the ocean. Ocean currents are an alternative source of clean energy due to their inherent reliability, persistence and sustainability. General ocean circulations exist in the form of large rotating ocean gyres, and feature extremely rapid current flow in the western boundaries due to the Coriolis effect. The Gulf Stream system is formed by the western boundary current of the North Atlantic Ocean that flows along the east coastline of the United States, and therefore is of particular interest as a potential energy resource for the United States. The theoretical energy balance in the Gulf Stream system is examined using the two-dimensional ocean circulation equations based on the assumptions of the Stommel model for subtropical gyres with the quasi-geostrophic balance between pressure gradient, Coriolis force, wind stress and friction driving the circulation. To represent flow dissipation due to turbines a spatially varying turbine drag coefficient is formulated and a finite difference numerical approach is utilized to obtain an implicit solution of the model. The results show that considering extraction over a region representing the entire Florida Current portion of the Gulf Stream system, the average power dissipated ranges between 4 and 6 GW with a mean around 5.1 GW. This corresponds to an average of approximately 45 TWh/yr. However, if the extraction area approximates the entire portion of the Gulf Stream within 200 miles of the US coastline, the average power dissipated becomes 18.6 GW or 163 TWh/yr. The impact of the localized turbine drag on the hydrodynamics is primarily within the turbine region. The extra drag force from turbines slows down the current velocity and leads to redirection of the Gulf Stream flow. It also results in a sea surface drop in the turbine region. Localized turbine drag significantly reduces residual kinetic energy flux in the circulation. However, its influence on the residual volume flux depends on the area of the turbine region.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Xiufeng & Haas, Kevin A. & Fritz, Hermann M., 2014. "Evaluating the potential for energy extraction from turbines in the gulf stream system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 12-21.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:72:y:2014:i:c:p:12-21
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.06.039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148114003796
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2014.06.039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bahaj, A.S & Myers, L.E, 2003. "Fundamentals applicable to the utilisation of marine current turbines for energy production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(14), pages 2205-2211.
    2. Mueller, Markus & Wallace, Robin, 2008. "Enabling science and technology for marine renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4376-4382, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan F. Bárcenas Graniel & Jassiel V. H. Fontes & Hector F. Gomez Garcia & Rodolfo Silva, 2021. "Assessing Hydrokinetic Energy in the Mexican Caribbean: A Case Study in the Cozumel Channel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Kirinus, Eduardo de Paula & Oleinik, Phelype Haron & Costi, Juliana & Marques, Wiliam Correa, 2018. "Long-term simulations for ocean energy off the Brazilian coast," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 364-382.
    3. Razi, P. & Ramaprabhu, P. & Tarey, P. & Muglia, M. & Vermillion, C., 2022. "A low-order wake interaction modeling framework for the performance of ocean current turbines under turbulent conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1602-1617.
    4. Li, Binghui & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo & DeCarolis, Joseph F. & Bane, John & He, Ruoying & Keeler, Andrew G. & Neary, Vincent S., 2017. "The economics of electricity generation from Gulf Stream currents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 649-658.
    5. Milad Shadman & Corbiniano Silva & Daiane Faller & Zhijia Wu & Luiz Paulo de Freitas Assad & Luiz Landau & Carlos Levi & Segen F. Estefen, 2019. "Ocean Renewable Energy Potential, Technology, and Deployments: A Case Study of Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-37, September.
    6. Domenico Curto & Vincenzo Franzitta & Andrea Guercio, 2021. "Sea Wave Energy. A Review of the Current Technologies and Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-31, October.
    7. Campisi-Pinto, Salvatore & Gianchandani, Kaushal & Ashkenazy, Yosef, 2020. "Statistical tests for the distribution of surface wind and current speeds across the globe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 861-876.
    8. Roger Samsó & Júlia Crespin & Antonio García-Olivares & Jordi Solé, 2023. "Examining the Potential of Marine Renewable Energy: A Net Energy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-35, May.
    9. Yang, Xiufeng & Haas, Kevin A. & Fritz, Hermann M. & French, Steven P. & Shi, Xuan & Neary, Vincent S. & Gunawan, Budi, 2015. "National geodatabase of ocean current power resource in USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 496-507.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nachtane, M. & Tarfaoui, M. & Goda, I. & Rouway, M., 2020. "A review on the technologies, design considerations and numerical models of tidal current turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1274-1288.
    2. Liu, Hong-wei & Ma, Shun & Li, Wei & Gu, Hai-gang & Lin, Yong-gang & Sun, Xiao-jing, 2011. "A review on the development of tidal current energy in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 1141-1146, February.
    3. Castro-Santos, Laura & Martins, Elson & Guedes Soares, C., 2016. "Cost assessment methodology for combined wind and wave floating offshore renewable energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 866-880.
    4. Zeyringer, Marianne & Fais, Birgit & Keppo, Ilkka & Price, James, 2018. "The potential of marine energy technologies in the UK – Evaluation from a systems perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1281-1293.
    5. Fan, YaJun & Mu, AnLe & Ma, Tao, 2016. "Modeling and control of a hybrid wind-tidal turbine with hydraulic accumulator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 188-199.
    6. Wilberforce, Tabbi & El Hassan, Zaki & Durrant, A. & Thompson, J. & Soudan, Bassel & Olabi, A.G., 2019. "Overview of ocean power technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 165-181.
    7. Artal, Osvaldo & Pizarro, Oscar & Sepúlveda, Héctor H., 2019. "The impact of spring-neap tidal-stream cycles in tidal energy assessments in the Chilean Inland Sea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 496-506.
    8. Chen, Long & Lam, Wei-Haur, 2015. "A review of survivability and remedial actions of tidal current turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 891-900.
    9. Xiao, Shaohui & Lin, Kun & Liu, Hongjun & Zhou, Annan, 2021. "Performance analysis of monopile-supported wind turbines subjected to wind and operation loads," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 842-858.
    10. Neill, Simon P. & Hashemi, M. Reza & Lewis, Matt J., 2016. "Tidal energy leasing and tidal phasing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 580-587.
    11. O Rourke, Fergal & Boyle, Fergal & Reynolds, Anthony, 2010. "Tidal energy update 2009," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 398-409, February.
    12. Neill, Simon P. & Hashemi, M. Reza & Lewis, Matt J., 2014. "Optimal phasing of the European tidal stream resource using the greedy algorithm with penalty function," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 997-1006.
    13. Romero-Gomez, Pedro & Richmond, Marshall C., 2014. "Simulating blade-strike on fish passing through marine hydrokinetic turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 401-413.
    14. Cuadra, L. & Salcedo-Sanz, S. & Nieto-Borge, J.C. & Alexandre, E. & Rodríguez, G., 2016. "Computational intelligence in wave energy: Comprehensive review and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1223-1246.
    15. Uihlein, Andreas & Magagna, Davide, 2016. "Wave and tidal current energy – A review of the current state of research beyond technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1070-1081.
    16. Rourke, Fergal O. & Boyle, Fergal & Reynolds, Anthony, 2010. "Marine current energy devices: Current status and possible future applications in Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 1026-1036, April.
    17. Ramos, V. & Carballo, R. & Álvarez, M. & Sánchez, M. & Iglesias, G., 2014. "A port towards energy self-sufficiency using tidal stream power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 432-444.
    18. Walker, S. & Thies, P.R., 2021. "A review of component and system reliability in tidal turbine deployments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Ponta, F.L. & Jacovkis, P.M., 2008. "Marine-current power generation by diffuser-augmented floating hydro-turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 665-673.
    20. Laura Castro-Santos & Elson Martins & C. Guedes Soares, 2016. "Methodology to Calculate the Costs of a Floating Offshore Renewable Energy Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:72:y:2014:i:c:p:12-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.