IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v62y2014icp353-361.html

Processing of glycerol under sub and supercritical water conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Tapah, B.F.
  • Santos, R.C.D.
  • Leeke, G.A.

Abstract

Converting glycerol, a by-product from biodiesel production into useful products and energy could contribute to a positive life cycle for the biodiesel process. One kg of glycerol is produced for every 10 kg of biodiesel and has the potential to be used as a source of H2, syngas or CH4 by an appropriate conversion process. Catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification (CSCWG) processing of crude glycerol solutions is one such viable option. Above its critical point [>221 barg, >374 °C], the properties of water, such as the low relative permittivity and high ionic product make it capable of dissolving non-polar organic compounds, allowing for high reactivity, and the ability to act as an acid/base catalyst. In this work, the degradation of glycerol by CSCWG at temperatures [400–550 °C] and pressures [170–270 barg] was investigated using a packed bed reactor (PBR) containing a Fe2O3 + Cr2O3 catalyst. Glycerol feed concentrations were between 2 and 30 wt% at flow rates from [10–65 ml/min], which gave weight hourly space velocities (WHSV) of [38–125 h−1]. The results indicated that high temperature and low feed concentration tended to increase the gas yield and selectivity toward H2 production with some char (<2.7 wt%). Syngas of up to 64 mole% was obtained with minimum 4:1 mole ratio of H2:CO. High yields of volatile hydrocarbons were also obtained: 14 and 69 mole % for methane and ethylene, respectively, which could be used for energy generation in SOFCs or turbines, reformed to syngas or converted to chemicals by an appropriate route. Pressure had little effect on the gas yields in the subcritical water region, but had a positive effect on H2 and CO2 in the supercritical region where char formation also was increased resulting in loss of catalyst activity. Complete conversion of glycerol was achieved at high temperature (550 °C). A maximum of 11 wt% liquid products were obtained at 400 °C (mainly allyl alcohol, methanol and formaldehyde). Catalyst stability was also evaluated, which was found to reach relative stability in the supercritical water environment for up to 9 h of operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tapah, B.F. & Santos, R.C.D. & Leeke, G.A., 2014. "Processing of glycerol under sub and supercritical water conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 353-361.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:62:y:2014:i:c:p:353-361
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148113003820
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guo, Y. & Wang, S.Z. & Xu, D.H. & Gong, Y.M. & Ma, H.H. & Tang, X.Y., 2010. "Review of catalytic supercritical water gasification for hydrogen production from biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 334-343, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Florentina Maxim & Iuliana Poenaru & Elena Ecaterina Toma & Giuseppe Stefan Stoian & Florina Teodorescu & Cristian Hornoiu & Speranta Tanasescu, 2021. "Functional Materials for Waste-to-Energy Processes in Supercritical Water," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Goswami, Kishor & Choudhury, Hari K., 2015. "To grow or not to grow? Factors influencing the adoption of and continuation with Jatropha in North East India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 627-638.
    3. Kıpçak, Ekin & Akgün, Mesut, 2018. "Biofuel production from olive mill wastewater through its Ni/Al2O3 and Ru/Al2O3 catalyzed supercritical water gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 155-164.
    4. Kapil Khandelwal & Philip Boahene & Sonil Nanda & Ajay K. Dalai, 2023. "Hydrogen Production from Supercritical Water Gasification of Model Compounds of Crude Glycerol from Biodiesel Industries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Galadima, Ahmad & Muraza, Oki, 2014. "Biodiesel production from algae by using heterogeneous catalysts: A critical review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 72-83.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Bowei & Guo, Simao & Jin, Hui, 2022. "Production forecast analysis of BP neural network based on Yimin lignite supercritical water gasification experiment results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    2. Tekin, Kubilay & Karagöz, Selhan & Bektaş, Sema, 2014. "A review of hydrothermal biomass processing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 673-687.
    3. Pasquale Iannotta & Giuseppe Caputo & Francesca Scargiali & Sonia Longo & Maurizio Cellura & Alberto Brucato, 2020. "Combined Gasification-Oxidation System for Waste Treatment with Supercritical Water: LCA and Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Janajreh, Isam & Adeyemi, Idowu & Raza, Syed Shabbar & Ghenai, Chaouki, 2021. "A review of recent developments and future prospects in gasification systems and their modeling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Samiee-Zafarghandi, Roudabeh & Karimi-Sabet, Javad & Abdoli, Mohammad Ali & Karbassi, Abdolreza, 2018. "Supercritical water gasification of microalga Chlorella PTCC 6010 for hydrogen production: Box-Behnken optimization and evaluating catalytic effect of MnO2/SiO2 and NiO/SiO2," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 189-201.
    6. Maity, Sunil K., 2015. "Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: Part II," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1446-1466.
    7. Ning Li & Bo Yan & Xian-Ming Xiao, 2015. "A Review of Laboratory-Scale Research on Upgrading Heavy Oil in Supercritical Water," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-28, August.
    8. Yan, Mi & Liu, Jianyong & Yoshikawa, Kunio & Jiang, Jiahao & Zhang, Yan & Zhu, Gaojun & Liu, Yu & Hantoko, Dwi, 2022. "Cascading disposal for food waste by integration of hydrothermal carbonization and supercritical water gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 914-926.
    9. Lin, Junhao & Sun, Shichang & Cui, Chongwei & Ma, Rui & Fang, Lin & Zhang, Peixin & Quan, Zonggang & Song, Xin & Yan, Jianglong & Luo, Juan, 2019. "Hydrogen-rich bio-gas generation and optimization in relation to heavy metals immobilization during Pd-catalyzed supercritical water gasification of sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Kıpçak, Ekin & Akgün, Mesut, 2018. "Biofuel production from olive mill wastewater through its Ni/Al2O3 and Ru/Al2O3 catalyzed supercritical water gasification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 155-164.
    11. Lei Yi & Jingwei Chen & Zhigang Liu & Huiming Chen & Daoxiu Liu & Zheng Liu & Bin Chen, 2022. "Study on Hydrogen Production by Supercritical Water Gasification of Unsymmetrical Dimethylhydrazine under Multi-Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-11, September.
    12. Pedersen, T.H. & Grigoras, I.F. & Hoffmann, J. & Toor, S.S. & Daraban, I.M. & Jensen, C.U. & Iversen, S.B. & Madsen, R.B. & Glasius, M. & Arturi, K.R. & Nielsen, R.P. & Søgaard, E.G. & Rosendahl, L.A., 2016. "Continuous hydrothermal co-liquefaction of aspen wood and glycerol with water phase recirculation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1034-1041.
    13. Samiee-Zafarghandi, Roudabeh & Karimi-Sabet, Javad & Abdoli, Mohammad Ali & Karbassi, Abdolreza, 2018. "Increasing microalgal carbohydrate content for hydrothermal gasification purposes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 710-719.
    14. Hu, Yulin & Gong, Mengyue & Xing, Xuelian & Wang, Haoyu & Zeng, Yimin & Xu, Chunbao Charles, 2020. "Supercritical water gasification of biomass model compounds: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    15. Wang, Cui & Li, Linfeng & Chen, Yunan & Ge, Zhiwei & Jin, Hui, 2021. "Supercritical water gasification of wheat straw: Composition of reaction products and kinetic study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    16. Özdenkçi, Karhan & Prestipino, Mauro & Björklund-Sänkiaho, Margareta & Galvagno, Antonio & De Blasio, Cataldo, 2020. "Alternative energy valorization routes of black liquor by stepwise supercritical water gasification: Effect of process parameters on hydrogen yield and energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Knez, Ž. & Markočič, E. & Leitgeb, M. & Primožič, M. & Knez Hrnčič, M. & Škerget, M., 2014. "Industrial applications of supercritical fluids: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 235-243.
    18. Raza, A. & Deen, K.M. & Asselin, E. & Haider, W., 2022. "A review on the electrocatalytic dissociation of water over stainless steel: Hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    19. Kumar, Mayank & Olajire Oyedun, Adetoyese & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1742-1770.
    20. Sandro González-Arias & Abel Zúñiga-Moreno & Ricardo García-Morales & Octavio Elizalde-Solis & Francisco J. Verónico-Sánchez & Sergio O. Flores-Valle, 2021. "Gasification of Psidium guajava L. Waste Using Supercritical Water: Evaluation of Feed Ratio and Moderate Temperatures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:62:y:2014:i:c:p:353-361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.