IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v243y2025ics0960148125001879.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Submerged wave energy converter dynamics and the impact of PTO-mooring configuration on power performance

Author

Listed:
  • Ali, Raza
  • Meek, Moira
  • Robertson, Bryson

Abstract

Wave energy and associated wave energy converters (WECs) show potential to significantly contribute to global renewable energy goals. Surface-piercing WECs are the most prevalent, while subsurface WECs are in nascent stages of gaining a foothold and development. However, there are distinct potential advantages to subsurface WECs that make them a compelling pursuit; including increased resiliency to extreme wave conditions and decreased visual impact. However, there is still significant variation in design regarding the power take-off (PTO) and mooring system configurations. Current research shows that the number of PTOs and their configuration in a mooring system affects the dynamics of the WEC and its ability to capture energy in heave, surge, and pitch. Primarily, this study explores the effect of increasing the number of PTOs on power performance in regular and irregular wave conditions. Secondly, the rate of energy generation decay of different PTO configurations as they are submerged deeper within the water column is analyzed. This study investigates a single, three, four, and five-tether PTO configuration utilizing ProteusDS, a time-domain hydrodynamics analysis software. Results suggest that a three-PTO system can provide better broadband performance, slightly improved power quality, and reduced PTO damping and tether tension over a single-tether PTO configuration. Without factoring in the effects of differing loads and component requirements on cost efficiency, a three-tether PTO configuration most efficiently captures energy from all degrees of freedom (DOF) as adding additional PTO-mooring lines does not result in a significant increase in energy generation. All configurations are shown to have similar energy generation decay that follows the exponential decaying trends of the wave orbital trajectories.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali, Raza & Meek, Moira & Robertson, Bryson, 2025. "Submerged wave energy converter dynamics and the impact of PTO-mooring configuration on power performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:243:y:2025:i:c:s0960148125001879
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.122525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125001879
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2025.122525?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babarit, A., 2015. "A database of capture width ratio of wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 610-628.
    2. Robertson, Bryson & Bailey, Helen & Buckham, Bradley, 2019. "Resource assessment parameterization impact on wave energy converter power production and mooring loads," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Sergiienko, N.Y. & Cazzolato, B.S. & Ding, B. & Arjomandi, M., 2016. "An optimal arrangement of mooring lines for the three-tether submerged point-absorbing wave energy converter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 27-37.
    4. Jeremiah Pastor & Yucheng Liu, 2016. "Wave Climate Resource Analysis Based on a Revised Gamma Spectrum for Wave Energy Conversion Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Sergiienko, N.Y. & Cazzolato, B.S. & Ding, B. & Hardy, P. & Arjomandi, M., 2017. "Performance comparison of the floating and fully submerged quasi-point absorber wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 425-437.
    6. Gabrielle Dunkle & Shangyan Zou & Bryson Robertson, 2022. "Wave Resource Assessments: Spatiotemporal Impacts of WEC Size and Wave Spectra on Power Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Robertson, Bryson & Bailey, Helen & Clancy, Dan & Ortiz, Juan & Buckham, Bradley, 2016. "Influence of wave resource assessment methodology on wave energy production estimates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1145-1160.
    8. Guillou, Nicolas, 2020. "Estimating wave energy flux from significant wave height and peak period," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1383-1393.
    9. Guo, Bingyong & Ringwood, John V., 2021. "Geometric optimisation of wave energy conversion devices: A survey," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    10. Matthew Leary & Curtis Rusch & Zhe Zhang & Bryson Robertson, 2021. "Comparison and Validation of Hydrodynamic Theories for Wave Energy Converter Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Choupin, O. & Têtu, A. & Del Río-Gamero, B. & Ferri, F. & Kofoed, JP., 2022. "Premises for an annual energy production and capacity factor improvement towards a few optimised wave energy converters configurations and resources pairs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    2. Robertson, Bryson & Bailey, Helen & Leary, Matthew & Buckham, Bradley, 2021. "A methodology for architecture agnostic and time flexible representations of wave energy converter performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    3. Zhang, Yongxing & Huang, Zhicong & Zou, Bowei & Bian, Jing, 2023. "Conceptual design and analysis for a novel parallel configuration-type wave energy converter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 627-644.
    4. Erfan Amini & Danial Golbaz & Fereidoun Amini & Meysam Majidi Nezhad & Mehdi Neshat & Davide Astiaso Garcia, 2020. "A Parametric Study of Wave Energy Converter Layouts in Real Wave Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Shadmani, Alireza & Nikoo, Mohammad Reza & Gandomi, Amir H. & Chen, Mingjie & Nazari, Rouzbeh, 2024. "Advancements in optimizing wave energy converter geometry utilizing metaheuristic algorithms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Galván-Pozos, D.E. & Sergiienko, N.Y. & García-Nava, H. & Ocampo-Torres, F.J. & Osuna-Cañedo, J.P., 2024. "Numerical analysis of the energy capture performance of a six-leg wave energy converter under Mexican waters wave conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Wang, Yuhan & Dong, Sheng, 2023. "Analytical investigation on a wave energy converter-dual-arc breakwater integration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    8. Chen, Ming & Vivekanandan, Rakesh & Rusch, Curtis J. & Okushemiya, David & Manalang, Dana & Robertson, Bryson & Hollinger, Geoffrey A., 2024. "A unified simulation framework for wave energy powered underwater vehicle docking and charging," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    9. Yu, Mingqi & Cao, Feifei & Shi, Hongda & Wu, Hongjian & Ma, Xu & Wu, Weimin & Zhang, Xiantao, 2025. "Heave attitude self-sustaining vs. rocker-type wave energy converter: A comparative study using both experimental and numerical methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    10. Wang, Yingguang & Wang, Lifu, 2018. "Towards realistically predicting the power outputs of wave energy converters: Nonlinear simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 120-128.
    11. Roy, Sanjoy, 2024. "Standard log-capture differentials as performance metrics for deepwater wave power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    12. Shahriar, Tanvir & Habib, M. Ahsan, 2024. "A reconnaissance-level characterization of wave energy resource in the exclusive economic zones of Bay-of-Bengal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    13. Zou, Shangyan & Robertson, Bryson & Roach, Aeron & Mundon, Tim & Rosenberg, Brian & Penalba, Markel, 2024. "Wave energy converter arrays: A methodology to assess performance considering the disturbed wave field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    14. Tunde Aderinto & Hua Li, 2019. "Review on Power Performance and Efficiency of Wave Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-24, November.
    15. Azam, Ali & Ahmed, Ammar & Yi, Minyi & Zhang, Zutao & Zhang, Zeqiang & Aslam, Touqeer & Mugheri, Shoukat Ali & Abdelrahman, Mansour & Ali, Asif & Qi, Lingfei, 2024. "Wave energy evolution: Knowledge structure, advancements, challenges and future opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    16. Neshat, Mehdi & Mirjalili, Seyedali & Sergiienko, Nataliia Y. & Esmaeilzadeh, Soheil & Amini, Erfan & Heydari, Azim & Garcia, Davide Astiaso, 2022. "Layout optimisation of offshore wave energy converters using a novel multi-swarm cooperative algorithm with backtracking strategy: A case study from coasts of Australia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    17. Alireza Shadmani & Mohammad Reza Nikoo & Riyadh I. Al-Raoush & Nasrin Alamdari & Amir H. Gandomi, 2022. "The Optimal Configuration of Wave Energy Conversions Respective to the Nearshore Wave Energy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-29, October.
    18. Fairley, Iain & Lewis, Matthew & Robertson, Bryson & Hemer, Mark & Masters, Ian & Horrillo-Caraballo, Jose & Karunarathna, Harshinie & Reeve, Dominic E., 2020. "A classification system for global wave energy resources based on multivariate clustering," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    19. Meng, Fantai & Ding, Boyin & Cazzolato, Benjamin & Arjomandi, Maziar, 2019. "Modal analysis of a submerged spherical point absorber with asymmetric mass distribution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 223-237.
    20. Juan Pablo Castaño Serna & Ainhoa Rubio-Clemente & Edwin Chica, 2024. "Design of a Wave Generation System Using an Oscillating Paddle-Type Device Anchored to Fixed Structures on the Coast," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:243:y:2025:i:c:s0960148125001879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.