IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v115y2018icp1153-1165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of Weibull parameters for wind data measured from met-mast and remote sensing techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Chaurasiya, Prem Kumar
  • Ahmed, Siraj
  • Warudkar, Vilas

Abstract

The remote sensing techniques are gaining attention worldwide for the comprehensive assessment of wind resource in flat, complex, and mountainous terrain. This paper presents an attempt to increase the confidence on remote sensing technique to compute Weibull parameters at higher heights for assessment of wind energy resource. The measurement campaign was conducted at Kayathar, Tamil Nadu, India. The 10 min average time series wind speed data for the period of one month (September 2014) were recorded simultaneously at 80 m and 100 m using cup anemometer installed in the proximity of 120 m meteorological mast, Second Wind Triton SODAR (Sound Detection and Ranging) and Continuous-wave wind LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging). The data obtained from this measurement were analyzed and Weibull parameters were evaluated using nine different methods. The applicability of nine methods for calculation of Weibull parameters is analyzed based on statistical analysis i.e. Root Mean Square Error Test, Coefficient of Determination, Mean Absolute Percentage Error, and Chi-square Test for both measuring techniques. This study also shows the performance of remote sensing technology by comparing with result obtained from met mast. The outcome of this study is expected to encourage the deployment of remote sensing techniques at Indian sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaurasiya, Prem Kumar & Ahmed, Siraj & Warudkar, Vilas, 2018. "Comparative analysis of Weibull parameters for wind data measured from met-mast and remote sensing techniques," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1153-1165.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:115:y:2018:i:c:p:1153-1165
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148117307681
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karthikeya, B.R. & Negi, Prabal S. & Srikanth, N., 2016. "Wind resource assessment for urban renewable energy application in Singapore," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 403-414.
    2. Chang, Tian Pau, 2011. "Performance comparison of six numerical methods in estimating Weibull parameters for wind energy application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 272-282, January.
    3. Arslan, Talha & Bulut, Y. Murat & Altın Yavuz, Arzu, 2014. "Comparative study of numerical methods for determining Weibull parameters for wind energy potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 820-825.
    4. Carneiro, Tatiane C. & Melo, Sofia P. & Carvalho, Paulo C.M. & Braga, Arthur Plínio de S., 2016. "Particle Swarm Optimization method for estimation of Weibull parameters: A case study for the Brazilian northeast region," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 751-759.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin, Yuqing & Ju, Ping & Rehtanz, Christian & Wu, Feng & Pan, Xueping, 2018. "Equivalent modeling of wind energy conversion considering overall effect of pitch angle controllers in wind farm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 485-496.
    2. Alrashidi, Musaed & Rahman, Saifur & Pipattanasomporn, Manisa, 2020. "Metaheuristic optimization algorithms to estimate statistical distribution parameters for characterizing wind speeds," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 664-681.
    3. Yahya Z. Alharthi & Mahbube K. Siddiki & Ghulam M. Chaudhry, 2018. "Resource Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of a Grid-Connected Solar PV-Wind Hybrid System for Different Locations in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Tang, Shengming & Li, Tiantian & Guo, Yun & Zhu, Rong & Qu, Hongya, 2022. "Correction of various environmental influences on Doppler wind lidar based on multiple linear regression model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 933-947.
    5. Mingcan Li & Hanbin Xiao & Lin Pan & Chengjun Xu, 2019. "Study of Generalized Interaction Wake Models Systems with ELM Variation for Off-Shore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-32, March.
    6. Tiam Kapen, Pascalin & Jeutho Gouajio, Marinette & Yemélé, David, 2020. "Analysis and efficient comparison of ten numerical methods in estimating Weibull parameters for wind energy potential: Application to the city of Bafoussam, Cameroon," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1188-1198.
    7. Wang, Jianzhou & Huang, Xiaojia & Li, Qiwei & Ma, Xuejiao, 2018. "Comparison of seven methods for determining the optimal statistical distribution parameters: A case study of wind energy assessment in the large-scale wind farms of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 432-448.
    8. Suwarno Suwarno & M. Fitra Zambak, 2021. "The Probability Density Function for Wind Speed Using Modified Weibull Distribution," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(6), pages 544-550.
    9. Katinas, Vladislovas & Gecevicius, Giedrius & Marciukaitis, Mantas, 2018. "An investigation of wind power density distribution at location with low and high wind speeds using statistical model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 442-451.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allouhi, A. & Zamzoum, O. & Islam, M.R. & Saidur, R. & Kousksou, T. & Jamil, A. & Derouich, A., 2017. "Evaluation of wind energy potential in Morocco's coastal regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 311-324.
    2. Tiam Kapen, Pascalin & Jeutho Gouajio, Marinette & Yemélé, David, 2020. "Analysis and efficient comparison of ten numerical methods in estimating Weibull parameters for wind energy potential: Application to the city of Bafoussam, Cameroon," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1188-1198.
    3. Mehr Gul & Nengling Tai & Wentao Huang & Muhammad Haroon Nadeem & Moduo Yu, 2019. "Assessment of Wind Power Potential and Economic Analysis at Hyderabad in Pakistan: Powering to Local Communities Using Wind Power," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Saeed, Muhammad Abid & Ahmed, Zahoor & Zhang, Weidong, 2020. "Wind energy potential and economic analysis with a comparison of different methods for determining the optimal distribution parameters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1092-1109.
    5. Dongbum Kang & Kyungnam Ko & Jongchul Huh, 2018. "Comparative Study of Different Methods for Estimating Weibull Parameters: A Case Study on Jeju Island, South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Wais, Piotr, 2017. "A review of Weibull functions in wind sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1099-1107.
    7. Alrashidi, Musaed & Rahman, Saifur & Pipattanasomporn, Manisa, 2020. "Metaheuristic optimization algorithms to estimate statistical distribution parameters for characterizing wind speeds," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 664-681.
    8. Fazelpour, Farivar & Markarian, Elin & Soltani, Nima, 2017. "Wind energy potential and economic assessment of four locations in Sistan and Balouchestan province in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 646-667.
    9. Mekalathur B Hemanth Kumar & Saravanan Balasubramaniyan & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban & Jens Bo Holm-Nielsen, 2019. "Wind Energy Potential Assessment by Weibull Parameter Estimation Using Multiverse Optimization Method: A Case Study of Tirumala Region in India," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Wais, Piotr, 2017. "Two and three-parameter Weibull distribution in available wind power analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 15-29.
    11. Usta, Ilhan, 2016. "An innovative estimation method regarding Weibull parameters for wind energy applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 301-314.
    12. Bahrami, Arian & Teimourian, Amir & Okoye, Chiemeka Onyeka & Khosravi, Nima, 2019. "Assessing the feasibility of wind energy as a power source in Turkmenistan; a major opportunity for Central Asia's energy market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 415-427.
    13. Munir Ali Elfarra & Mustafa Kaya, 2018. "Comparison of Optimum Spline-Based Probability Density Functions to Parametric Distributions for the Wind Speed Data in Terms of Annual Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    14. Ren, Guorui & Wan, Jie & Liu, Jinfu & Yu, Daren, 2019. "Characterization of wind resource in China from a new perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 994-1010.
    15. Chandel, S.S. & Ramasamy, P. & Murthy, K.S.R, 2014. "Wind power potential assessment of 12 locations in western Himalayan region of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 530-545.
    16. Pagnini, Luisa C. & Burlando, Massimiliano & Repetto, Maria Pia, 2015. "Experimental power curve of small-size wind turbines in turbulent urban environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 112-121.
    17. Katinas, Vladislovas & Gecevicius, Giedrius & Marciukaitis, Mantas, 2018. "An investigation of wind power density distribution at location with low and high wind speeds using statistical model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 442-451.
    18. Chang, Tian-Pau & Ko, Hong-Hsi & Liu, Feng-Jiao & Chen, Pai-Hsun & Chang, Ying-Pin & Liang, Ying-Hsin & Jang, Horng-Yuan & Lin, Tsung-Chi & Chen, Yi-Hwa, 2012. "Fractal dimension of wind speed time series," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 742-749.
    19. Ebrahimi, Abbas & Movahhedi, Mohammadreza, 2018. "Wind turbine power improvement utilizing passive flow control with microtab," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 575-582.
    20. César Henrique Mattos Pires & Felipe M. Pimenta & Carla A. D'Aquino & Osvaldo R. Saavedra & Xuerui Mao & Arcilan T. Assireu, 2020. "Coastal Wind Power in Southern Santa Catarina, Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:115:y:2018:i:c:p:1153-1165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.