IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v254y2025ipbs095183202400677x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A machine learning framework for seismic risk assessment of industrial equipment

Author

Listed:
  • Quinci, Gianluca
  • Paolacci, Fabrizio
  • Fragiadakis, Michalis
  • Bursi, Oreste S.

Abstract

The paper aims to propose a novel machine learning framework for seismic risk assessment of industrial facilities. In this respect, a compound artificial neural network model is employed, which is based on two different artificial neural network models in series. The first artificial neural network is a regression model employed to generate samples of a vector-valued intensity measure. The second one is a classification model that is used to predict structural damage, starting from the outcomes of the first artificial neural network model. The datasets used for training and validation of the two artificial neural networks are based on hazard-consistent accelerograms and numerical analyses that are performed with an efficient finite element model of the structure. The methodology entails a preliminary feature selection phase for the identification of the aforementioned vector-valued of intensity measures that better classifies the damage/no-damage condition of the structure. This phase is implemented through the principal component analysis method. Subsequently, the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm is used to generate samples of a selected intensity measure, feeding the first ANN model. In turn, the chosen features are used as input parameters of the second ANN model to generate samples of damage/no-damage events. Using the two ANN in series, the mean annual frequency of exceeding a specific limit state is derived. The proposed framework is validated using a typical multi-storey steel frame, focusing on the seismic risk assessment of a vertical storage tank located at the first floor of the primary structure. The proposed method exhibits some clear advantages of combining numerical models with ANN techniques, mainly related to: a reduced computational time; the avoidance of any prior information on the probabilistic model of fragility curves; and the use of model-driven data.

Suggested Citation

  • Quinci, Gianluca & Paolacci, Fabrizio & Fragiadakis, Michalis & Bursi, Oreste S., 2025. "A machine learning framework for seismic risk assessment of industrial equipment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:254:y:2025:i:pb:s095183202400677x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202400677X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110606?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moradi, Ramin & Cofre-Martel, Sergio & Lopez Droguett, Enrique & Modarres, Mohammad & Groth, Katrina M., 2022. "Integration of deep learning and Bayesian networks for condition and operation risk monitoring of complex engineering systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Necci, Amos & Cozzani, Valerio & Spadoni, Gigliola & Khan, Faisal, 2015. "Assessment of domino effect: State of the art and research Needs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 3-18.
    3. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Flötteröd, Gunnar & Bierlaire, Michel, 2013. "Metropolis–Hastings sampling of paths," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 53-66.
    5. Wu, Hao & Xu, Yanwen & Liu, Zheng & Li, Yumeng & Wang, Pingfeng, 2023. "Adaptive machine learning with physics-based simulations for mean time to failure prediction of engineering systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    6. Xu, Yanwen & Kohtz, Sara & Boakye, Jessica & Gardoni, Paolo & Wang, Pingfeng, 2023. "Physics-informed machine learning for reliability and systems safety applications: State of the art and challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Saraygord Afshari, Sajad & Enayatollahi, Fatemeh & Xu, Xiangyang & Liang, Xihui, 2022. "Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phan, Hieu Chi & Dhar, Ashutosh Sutra & Bui, Nang Duc, 2023. "Reliability assessment of pipelines crossing strike-slip faults considering modeling uncertainties using ANN models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Wang, Ziqi & Song, Junho & Broccardo, Marco, 2024. "Probabilistic Performance-Pattern Decomposition (PPPD): Analysis framework and applications to stochastic mechanical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    3. Chen, Edward & Bao, Han & Dinh, Nam, 2024. "Evaluating the reliability of machine-learning-based predictions used in nuclear power plant instrumentation and control systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    4. Khakifirooz, Marzieh & Fathi, Michel & Lee, I-Chen & Tseng, Sheng-Tsaing, 2023. "Neural ordinary differential equation for sequential optimal design of fatigue test under accelerated life test analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    5. Cao, Bohan & Yin, Qishuai & Guo, Yingying & Yang, Jin & Zhang, Laibin & Wang, Zhenquan & Tyagi, Mayank & Sun, Ting & Zhou, Xu, 2023. "Field data analysis and risk assessment of shallow gas hazards based on neural networks during industrial deep-water drilling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    6. Grabill, Nicholas & Wang, Stephanie & Olayinka, Hammed A. & De Alwis, Tharindu P. & Khalil, Yehia F. & Zou, Jian, 2024. "AI-augmented failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (AI-FMECA) for industrial applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    7. Zhang, Ruixing & An, Liqiang & He, Lun & Yang, Xinmeng & Huang, Zenghao, 2024. "Reliability analysis and inverse optimization method for floating wind turbines driven by dual meta-models combining transient-steady responses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    8. Roy, Atin & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2023. "Support vector machine in structural reliability analysis: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    9. Wang, Run-Zi & Gu, Hang-Hang & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Li, Kai-Shang & Wang, Ji & Wang, Xiao-Wei & Hideo, Miura & Zhang, Xian-Cheng & Tu, Shan-Tung, 2022. "A data-driven roadmap for creep-fatigue reliability assessment and its implementation in low-pressure turbine disk at elevated temperatures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    10. Tohme, Tony & Vanslette, Kevin & Youcef-Toumi, Kamal, 2023. "Reliable neural networks for regression uncertainty estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    11. Chiou, Suh-Wen, 2024. "A learning optimization for resilience enhancement of risk-informed traffic control system with hazardous materials transportation under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    12. Pan, Yongjun & Sun, Yu & Li, Zhixiong & Gardoni, Paolo, 2023. "Machine learning approaches to estimate suspension parameters for performance degradation assessment using accurate dynamic simulations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    13. Zhang, Qing & Tang, Lv & Xuan, Jianping & Shi, Tielin & Li, Rui, 2023. "An uncertainty relevance metric-based domain adaptation fault diagnosis method to overcome class relevance caused confusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    14. Ma, Yulin & Li, Lei & Yang, Jun, 2022. "Convolutional kernel aggregated domain adaptation for intelligent fault diagnosis with label noise," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    15. Mei, Fabin & Chen, Hao & Yang, Wenying & Zhai, Guofu, 2024. "A hybrid physics-informed machine learning approach for time-dependent reliability assessment of electromagnetic relays," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    16. Xu, Zidong & Wang, Hao & Zhao, Kaiyong & Zhang, Han & Liu, Yun & Lin, Yuxuan, 2024. "Evolutionary probability density reconstruction of stochastic dynamic responses based on physics-aided deep learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    17. Jiang, Shengyu & He, Rui & Chen, Guoming & Zhu, Yuan & Shi, Jiaming & Liu, Kang & Chang, Yuanjiang, 2023. "Semi-supervised health assessment of pipeline systems based on optical fiber monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    18. Azari, Mehdi Saman & Santini, Stefania & Edrisi, Farid & Flammini, Francesco, 2025. "Self-adaptive fault diagnosis for unseen working conditions based on digital twins and domain generalization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    19. Giannakeas, Ilias N. & Mazaheri, Fatemeh & Bacarreza, Omar & Khodaei, Zahra Sharif & Aliabadi, Ferri M.H., 2023. "Probabilistic residual strength assessment of smart composite aircraft panels using guided waves," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    20. Wang, Ying & Zheng, Xueke & Wang, Le & Lu, Gavin & Jia, Yixing & Li, Kezhi & Li, Mian, 2023. "Sensor fault detection of vehicle suspension systems based on transmissibility operators and Neyman–Pearson test," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:254:y:2025:i:pb:s095183202400677x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.