IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v260y2025ics0951832025002303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological guidance and quantitative measures regarding seismic capacity and safety of freestanding and inelastic anchored nonstructural elements housed in ordinary and critical facilities

Author

Listed:
  • D'Angela, Danilo
  • Magliulo, Gennaro

Abstract

The study provides a comprehensive investigation of the seismic capacity and safety assessment of nonstructural elements (NEs). A general and extendable methodology is developed for robust assessment of two representative model categories of NEs: rocking-dominated rigid blocks (RBs) and inelastic single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems, accounting for most acceleration-sensitive elements housed in ordinary and critical facilities. Numerical analysis is carried out implementing nonlinear dynamic models for NEs and accounting for multiple features, such as loading history types (ground and floor motions), NE dynamic properties, intensity measures (IMs), and multiple damage states (DSs). Quantitative capacity measures are provided, as well as novel closed-form equations are proposed for expeditious capacity assessment of NEs, including both capacity curves and surfaces. The seismic safety of the investigated NEs is estimated considering both ordinary and critical buildings, over low- to high-seismicity sites in Italy.

Suggested Citation

  • D'Angela, Danilo & Magliulo, Gennaro, 2025. "Methodological guidance and quantitative measures regarding seismic capacity and safety of freestanding and inelastic anchored nonstructural elements housed in ordinary and critical facilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:260:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025002303
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025002303
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:260:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025002303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.