IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v248y2024ics0951832024002424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-attempt missions with multiple rescue options

Author

Listed:
  • Levitin, Gregory
  • Xing, Liudong
  • Dai, Yuanshun

Abstract

In spite of intensive works on modeling and optimizing diverse mission aborting systems from the reliability community, none of the existing models have considered multiple rescue options. This paper pioneers the study of a multi-attempt mission system with different types of rescue procedures characterized by dissimilar system performance, shock rates, and costs. A new optimization problem is formulated, which determines the aborting rule and rescue option choice for each attempt to minimize the expected mission losses (EML) encompassing the mission failure penalty, system loss cost and rescue cost. A new numerical algorithm is then put forward to assess the EML of the considered multi-attempt mission system under any given mission abort and rescue policy (MARP). The genetic algorithm is further implemented to solve the MARP optimization problem. The proposed model is demonstrated through an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) performing a payload delivery mission with four possible rescue options. The UAV case study also investigates the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed numerical EML evaluation algorithm and reveals the impacts of several key parameters (mission failure penalty, system loss cost, the allowed number of attempts, shock resistance deterioration factor) on the EML and the optimal MARP solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2024. "Multi-attempt missions with multiple rescue options," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:248:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002424
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024002424
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:248:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.