IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v243y2024ics0951832023007263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability sensitivity analysis for RBSMC: A high-efficiency multiple response Gaussian process model

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Jiawei
  • Wan, Liangqi

Abstract

In modern architectural design, reduced beam section moment connections (RBSMC) play a crucial role. However, quantifying the importance of random input variables and failure modes has not been performed to improve RBSMC reliability. Thus, we propose a sensitivity study that evaluates the effect of geometric dimensions on the reliability of the RBSMC. The analysis measures the significance of each random input variable on the reliability of the RBSMC. Then, a reliability predictor, which combines the multiple response Gaussian process (MRGP) with the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), is introduced to efficiently produce surrogate models for failure surfaces. Based on the well-established surrogate models, the reliability is estimated without additional calling of the original limit state functions. The quadratic regression and analysis of variance are conducted to statistically evaluate the contribution of different variables to the reliability of the RBSMC. The proposal methodology accurately predicts reliability and identifies variables that significantly contribute to reliability. The results show that the proposed methodology is more efficient than existing methods at the early design stage. Furthermore, we applied this methodology to a radius cut RBSMC, which can minimize stress concentration and reduce the possibility of fracture to identify significant input variables for reliability. The computational results and discussions provide useful insights for the design of RBSMC.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Jiawei & Wan, Liangqi, 2024. "Reliability sensitivity analysis for RBSMC: A high-efficiency multiple response Gaussian process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023007263
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023007263
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:243:y:2024:i:c:s0951832023007263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.