IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v213y2021ics095183202100226x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A probabilistic approach to assess the computational uncertainty of ultimate strength of hull girders

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Shen
  • Kim, Do Kyun
  • Benson, Simon

Abstract

The simplified progressive collapse method is codified in the IACS Common Structural Rules (CSR) to calculate the ultimate strength of ship hull girders in longitudinal bending. Several benchmark studies have demonstrated the uncertainty of this method, which is primarily attributed to the variation in the load-shortening curve (LSC) of local structural components adopted by different participants. Quantifying this computational uncertainty will allow the model error factor applied for the ultimate strength of hull girder in a reliability-based ship structural design to be determined. A probabilistic approach is proposed in this paper to evaluate the prediction uncertainty of ultimate strength of the hull girder caused by the critical characteristics within the LSCs. The probability distributions of critical load-shortening characteristics of stiffened panels are developed based on a dataset generated by empirical formulae and the nonlinear finite element method. An adaptable LSC formulation, with the ability to cater for specific response features of local components, is utilised in conjunction with the Monte-Carlo simulation procedure and the simplified progressive collapse method to calculate the ultimate strength of a hull girder at each sampling. The proposed method is applied to four merchant ships and four naval vessels. The computational uncertainties of the ultimate strength of the case study vessels are discussed in association with their mean values and standard deviations. The study shows that the ultimate strength of ship hull girders is subjected to different uncertainties in sagging and hogging. Whist the strength of merchant ships are primarily governed by the ultimate compressive strength of critical stiffened panels, the strength of naval vessels are also sensitive to the post-collapse response of critical members.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Shen & Kim, Do Kyun & Benson, Simon, 2021. "A probabilistic approach to assess the computational uncertainty of ultimate strength of hull girders," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:213:y:2021:i:c:s095183202100226x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202100226X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107688?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Pan & Lu, Zhenzhou & Zhang, Kaichao & Xiao, Sinan & Yue, Zhufeng, 2018. "Copula-based decomposition approach for the derivative-based sensitivity of variance contributions with dependent variables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 437-450.
    2. Leira, B.J., 2016. "Reliability updating based on monitoring of structural response parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 212-223.
    3. Garbatov, Y. & Guedes Soares, C., 2009. "Structural maintenance planning based on historical data of corroded deck plates of tankers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1806-1817.
    4. Zugazagoitia, Eneko & Queral, Cesar & Fernández-Cosials, Kevin & Gómez, Javier & Durán, Luis Felipe & Sánchez-Torrijos, Jorge & Posada, José María, 2020. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of a PWR LOCA sequence using parametric and non-parametric methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Liu, Yan & Frangopol, Dan M., 2018. "Time-dependent reliability assessment of ship structures under progressive and shock deteriorations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 116-128.
    6. McKeand, Austin M. & Gorguluarslan, Recep M. & Choi, Seung-Kyum, 2021. "Stochastic analysis and validation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Ökten, Giray & Liu, Yaning, 2021. "Randomized quasi-Monte Carlo methods in global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    8. Damblin, Guillaume & Ghione, Alberto, 2021. "Adaptive use of replicated Latin Hypercube Designs for computing Sobol’ sensitivity indices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    9. Xu, Chonggang & Gertner, George Zdzislaw, 2008. "Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models with correlated parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(10), pages 1563-1573.
    10. Xiao, Mi & Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang, 2021. "A Kriging-assisted sampling method for reliability analysis of structures with hybrid uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    11. Moan, Torgeir & Ayala-Uraga, Efren, 2008. "Reliability-based assessment of deteriorating ship structures operating in multiple sea loading climates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 433-446.
    12. Hao, Wenrui & Lu, Zhenzhou & Tian, Longfei, 2012. "Importance measure of correlated normal variables and its sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 151-160.
    13. Parunov, Joško & Guedes Soares, C., 2008. "Effects of Common Structural Rules on hull-girder reliability of an Aframax oil tanker," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(9), pages 1317-1327.
    14. Francesco, Di Maio & Matteo, Fumagalli & Carlo, Guerini & Federico, Perotti & Enrico, Zio, 2021. "Time-dependent reliability analysis of the reactor building of a nuclear power plant for accounting of its aging and degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    15. Pan, Yan & Jing, Yunteng & Wu, Tonghai & Kong, Xiangxing, 2021. "An Integrated Data and Knowledge Model Addressing Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty for Oil Condition Monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    16. Liu, Yang & Wang, Dewei & Sun, Xiaodong & Liu, Yang & Dinh, Nam & Hu, Rui, 2021. "Uncertainty quantification for Multiphase-CFD simulations of bubbly flows: a machine learning-based Bayesian approach supported by high-resolution experiments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    17. Gong, Changqing & Frangopol, Dan M., 2020. "Time-variant hull girder reliability considering spatial dependence of corrosion growth, geometric and material properties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Yiming & Peng, Jianxin & Cai, C.S. & Zhou, Yadong & Wang, Lei & Zhang, Jianren, 2022. "Time-dependent reliability assessment of aging structures considering stochastic resistance degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Guo, Zehua & Dailey, Ryan & Feng, Tangtao & Zhou, Yukun & Sun, Zhongning & Corradini, Michael L & Wang, Jun, 2021. "Uncertainty analysis of ATF Cr-coated-Zircaloy on BWR in-vessel accident progression during a station blackout," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Liu, Wenli & Chen, Elton J. & Yao, Erlei & Wang, Yanyu & Chen, Yangyang, 2021. "Reliability analysis of face stability for tunnel excavation in a dependent system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    4. Hao, Wenrui & Lu, Zhenzhou & Wei, Pengfei, 2013. "Uncertainty importance measure for models with correlated normal variables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 48-58.
    5. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 399-432.
    6. Ballester-Ripoll, Rafael & Leonelli, Manuele, 2022. "Computing Sobol indices in probabilistic graphical models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    7. Ajenjo, Antoine & Ardillon, Emmanuel & Chabridon, Vincent & Cogan, Scott & Sadoulet-Reboul, Emeline, 2023. "Robustness evaluation of the reliability of penstocks combining line sampling and neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    8. Meng, Zeng & Zhao, Jingyu & Chen, Guohai & Yang, Dixiong, 2022. "Hybrid uncertainty propagation and reliability analysis using direct probability integral method and exponential convex model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    9. Wang, Zihan & Daeipour, Mohamad & Xu, Hongyi, 2023. "Quantification and propagation of Aleatoric uncertainties in topological structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    10. Wang, Tiao & Li, Chunhe & Zheng, Jian-jun & Hackl, Jürgen & Luan, Yao & Ishida, Tetsuya & Medepalli, Satya, 2023. "Consideration of coupling of crack development and corrosion in assessing the reliability of reinforced concrete beams subjected to bending," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    11. Mercadier Cécile & Ressel Paul, 2021. "Hoeffding–Sobol decomposition of homogeneous co-survival functions: from Choquet representation to extreme value theory application," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 179-198, January.
    12. Zhiwei Bai & Hongkui Wei & Yingying Xiao & Shufang Song & Sergei Kucherenko, 2021. "A Vine Copula-Based Global Sensitivity Analysis Method for Structures with Multidimensional Dependent Variables," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-20, October.
    13. HÃ¥vold, Jon Ivar, 2010. "Safety culture and safety management aboard tankers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 511-519.
    14. Yang, David Y. & Frangopol, Dan M., 2019. "Life-cycle management of deteriorating civil infrastructure considering resilience to lifetime hazards: A general approach based on renewal-reward processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 197-212.
    15. Cao, Jiaokun & Du, Farong & Ding, Shuiting, 2013. "Global sensitivity analysis for dynamic systems with stochastic input processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 106-117.
    16. Ning-Cong Xiao & Hong-Zhong Huang & Yan-Feng Li & Zhonglai Wang & Xiao-Ling Zhang, 2013. "Non-probabilistic reliability sensitivity analysis of the model of structural systems with interval variables whose state of dependence is determined by constraints," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(5), pages 491-498, October.
    17. Dong, Y. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2018. "Time-variant fatigue reliability assessment of welded joints based on the PHI2 and response surface methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 120-130.
    18. Pedram Asef & Marzia Milan & Andrew Lapthorn & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban, 2021. "Future Trends and Aging Analysis of Battery Energy Storage Systems for Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-28, December.
    19. Broto, Baptiste & Bachoc, François & Depecker, Marine & Martinez, Jean-Marc, 2019. "Sensitivity indices for independent groups of variables," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 19-31.
    20. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2019. "Reverse sensitivity testing: What does it take to break the model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 654-670.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:213:y:2021:i:c:s095183202100226x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.