IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v213y2021ics0951832021002258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding near-miss count data on construction sites using greedy D-vine copula marginal regression

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Fan
  • Li, Heng
  • Dong, Chao

Abstract

Near misses are an important type of accident precursor because they provide insights into failure-generating mechanisms, help understand safety risks, and guide necessary interventions before they develop into real accidents. A high occurrence frequency of near-miss incidents typically signals a warning of small safety margins. However, the occurrences of near-miss incidents are stochastic and serially dependent in nature. Ignoring these features will typically lead to a misunderstanding of a project's safety level. This paper presents a D-vine copula marginal regression model for count time series data. Incident counts are expressed as a function of predictors. A time-varying discrete marginal distribution is used to describe the uncertainty of incident occurrences at an arbitrary time point, while the dependence between consecutive observations at different time points is captured with copula functions. To allow for long-range and non-Gaussian dependences between incidents, the D-vine structure is used to build the multivariate copula function where the bivariate copula associated with each edge is not necessarily Gaussian. To avoid evaluating a large number of candidate models that use different marginals and bivariate copulas as building blocks, a greedy algorithm is proposed to estimate relevant parameters and select the best model. An information criterion is used to determine the tree level of the D-vine decomposition, which implies the Markov structure of the incident occurrences. The proposed method is applied to a set of near-miss count data collected from a construction project over 5 years. We show that the hidden dependence has a relatively large time-lag and is strongly non-Gaussian. Comparison with conventional methods shows that the proposed method is efficient and yields better predictive performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Fan & Li, Heng & Dong, Chao, 2021. "Understanding near-miss count data on construction sites using greedy D-vine copula marginal regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:213:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021002258
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021002258
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anastasios Panagiotelis & Claudia Czado & Harry Joe, 2012. "Pair Copula Constructions for Multivariate Discrete Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(499), pages 1063-1072, September.
    2. Panagiotelis, Anastasios & Czado, Claudia & Joe, Harry & Stöber, Jakob, 2017. "Model selection for discrete regular vine copulas," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 138-152.
    3. Sun, Fuqiang & Fu, Fangyou & Liao, Haitao & Xu, Dan, 2020. "Analysis of multivariate dependent accelerated degradation data using a random-effect general Wiener process and D-vine Copula," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. Chang, Bo & Joe, Harry, 2019. "Prediction based on conditional distributions of vine copulas," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 45-63.
    5. Aas, Kjersti & Czado, Claudia & Frigessi, Arnoldo & Bakken, Henrik, 2009. "Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 182-198, April.
    6. Brechmann, Eike Christian & Schepsmeier, Ulf, 2013. "Modeling Dependence with C- and D-Vine Copulas: The R Package CDVine," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 52(i03).
    7. Wang, Fan & Li, Heng, 2018. "System reliability under prescribed marginals and correlations: Are we correct about the effect of correlations?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 94-104.
    8. Smith, Michael & Min, Aleksey & Almeida, Carlos & Czado, Claudia, 2010. "Modeling Longitudinal Data Using a Pair-Copula Decomposition of Serial Dependence," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(492), pages 1467-1479.
    9. Khakzad, Nima & Khan, Faisal & Paltrinieri, Nicola, 2014. "On the application of near accident data to risk analysis of major accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 116-125.
    10. Fang, Jun & Jiang, Fan & Liu, Yong & Yang, Jingping, 2020. "Copula-based Markov process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 166-187.
    11. Saleh, Joseph H. & Saltmarsh, Elizabeth A. & Favarò, Francesca M. & Brevault, Loïc, 2013. "Accident precursors, near misses, and warning signs: Critical review and formal definitions within the framework of Discrete Event Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 148-154.
    12. Sellers, Kimberly F. & Raim, Andrew, 2016. "A flexible zero-inflated model to address data dispersion," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 68-80.
    13. Andriulo, S. & Gnoni, M.G., 2014. "Measuring the effectiveness of a near-miss management system: An application in an automotive firm supplier," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 154-162.
    14. Navarro, Jorge & Durante, Fabrizio, 2017. "Copula-based representations for the reliability of the residual lifetimes of coherent systems with dependent components," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 87-102.
    15. Joe, Harry & Hu, Taizhong, 1996. "Multivariate Distributions from Mixtures of Max-Infinitely Divisible Distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 240-265, May.
    16. Zilko, Aurelius A. & Kurowicka, Dorota, 2016. "Copula in a multivariate mixed discrete–continuous model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 28-55.
    17. Stöber, Jakob & Joe, Harry & Czado, Claudia, 2013. "Simplified pair copula constructions—Limitations and extensions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 101-118.
    18. Fang, Guanqi & Pan, Rong & Hong, Yili, 2020. "Copula-based reliability analysis of degrading systems with dependent failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Love, Peter E.D. & Tenekedjiev, Kiril, 2022. "Understanding near-miss count data on construction sites using Greedy D-vine Copula Marginal Regression: A comment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weiping Zhang & MengMeng Zhang & Yu Chen, 2020. "A Copula-Based GLMM Model for Multivariate Longitudinal Data with Mixed-Types of Responses," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 353-379, November.
    2. Sahin, Özge & Czado, Claudia, 2022. "Vine copula mixture models and clustering for non-Gaussian data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 136-158.
    3. Jakob Stöber & Ulf Schepsmeier, 2013. "Estimating standard errors in regular vine copula models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 2679-2707, December.
    4. Joshua Eklund & Jong-Min Kim, 2022. "Examining Factors That Affect Movie Gross Using Gaussian Copula Marginal Regression," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Huihui Lin & N. Rao Chaganty, 2021. "Multivariate distributions of correlated binary variables generated by pair-copulas," Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Lu Yang & Claudia Czado, 2022. "Two‐part D‐vine copula models for longitudinal insurance claim data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(4), pages 1534-1561, December.
    7. Sun, Fuqiang & Fu, Fangyou & Liao, Haitao & Xu, Dan, 2020. "Analysis of multivariate dependent accelerated degradation data using a random-effect general Wiener process and D-vine Copula," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    8. Kajal Lahiri & Liu Yang, 2023. "Predicting binary outcomes based on the pair-copula construction," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 3089-3119, June.
    9. Brechmann, Eike & Czado, Claudia & Paterlini, Sandra, 2014. "Flexible dependence modeling of operational risk losses and its impact on total capital requirements," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 271-285.
    10. Li, Haihe & Wang, Pan & Huang, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Zheng & Zhou, Changcong & Yue, Zhufeng, 2021. "Vine copula-based parametric sensitivity analysis of failure probability-based importance measure in the presence of multidimensional dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    11. Koliai, Lyes, 2016. "Extreme risk modeling: An EVT–pair-copulas approach for financial stress tests," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-22.
    12. Hirofumi Michimae & Takeshi Emura, 2022. "Bayesian ridge estimators based on copula-based joint prior distributions for regression coefficients," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 2741-2769, November.
    13. Cooke, R.M. & Kurowicka, D. & Wilson, K., 2015. "Sampling, conditionalizing, counting, merging, searching regular vines," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 4-18.
    14. Müller, Dominik & Czado, Claudia, 2019. "Dependence modelling in ultra high dimensions with vine copulas and the Graphical Lasso," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 211-232.
    15. Chemkha, Rahma & BenSaïda, Ahmed & Ghorbel, Ahmed, 2021. "Connectedness between cryptocurrencies and foreign exchange markets: Implication for risk management," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    16. Hobæk Haff, Ingrid & Aas, Kjersti & Frigessi, Arnoldo & Lacal, Virginia, 2016. "Structure learning in Bayesian Networks using regular vines," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 186-208.
    17. David E. Allen & Michael McAleer & Abhay K. Singh, 2017. "Risk Measurement and Risk Modelling Using Applications of Vine Copulas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-34, September.
    18. Calabrese, Raffaella & Degl’Innocenti, Marta & Osmetti, Silvia Angela, 2017. "The effectiveness of TARP-CPP on the US banking industry: A new copula-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 1029-1037.
    19. Erhardt, Tobias Michael & Czado, Claudia & Schepsmeier, Ulf, 2015. "Spatial composite likelihood inference using local C-vines," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 74-88.
    20. Kim, Daeyoung & Kim, Jong-Min & Liao, Shu-Min & Jung, Yoon-Sung, 2013. "Mixture of D-vine copulas for modeling dependence," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:213:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021002258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.