IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v204y2020ics0951832020306190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A two-scale maintenance policy for protection systems subject to shocks when meeting demands

Author

Listed:
  • Alberti, Alexandre R.
  • Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V.

Abstract

We propose a model for a two-scale hybrid inspection and preventive replacement policy for protection systems subject to shocks due to meeting demands. The policy guides periodic inspections and also considers both the age of the system and the number of demands met as parameters for decision-making on preventive replacement. We considered a non-repairable single-component protection system that is subject to demands that arrive according to a Homogeneous Poisson Process. The activation of the system on demand acts as a shock that increases the failure rate of the system with a given probability. We also considered that inspections are imperfect: they may result in false positives and false negatives. We evaluated the performance of the policy in terms of the cost-rate and rate of unmet demands. Our numerical analysis shows the strategic role of inspections and demonstrates the following: 1. The greater the effect of shocks the more beneficial is the two-scale policy relative to a one-scale policy; 2. The proposed policy performs well when the rate of demands varies over time. These findings are important to practice because they show that maintenance policies for protection systems should be less time based and more use based.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberti, Alexandre R. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V., 2020. "A two-scale maintenance policy for protection systems subject to shocks when meeting demands," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:204:y:2020:i:c:s0951832020306190
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832020306190
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Insua, David Rios & Ruggeri, Fabrizio & Soyer, Refik & Wilson, Simon, 2020. "Advances in Bayesian decision making in reliability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 1-18.
    2. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2019. "Optimal preventive maintenance for systems having a continuous output and operating in a random environment," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(2), pages 327-350, July.
    3. Petchrompo, Sanyapong & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2019. "A review of asset management literature on multi-asset systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 181-201.
    4. Alberti, Alexandre R. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Scarf, Philip & Silva, André L.O., 2018. "Modelling inspection and replacement quality for a protection system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 145-153.
    5. Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Lopes, R.S. & Scarf, P.A., 2018. "A general inspection and opportunistic replacement policy for one-component systems of variable quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 911-919.
    6. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim & Levitin, Gregory, 2017. "On preventive maintenance of systems with lifetimes dependent on a random shock process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 90-97.
    7. Cha, Ji Hwan & Finkelstein, Maxim & Levitin, Gregory, 2018. "Bivariate preventive maintenance of systems with lifetimes dependent on a random shock process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 122-134.
    8. Yang, Li & Zhao, Yu & Peng, Rui & Ma, Xiaobing, 2018. "Hybrid preventive maintenance of competing failures under random environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 130-140.
    9. Flage, Roger, 2014. "A delay time model with imperfect and failure-inducing inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-12.
    10. Berrade, M.D. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Scarf, Philip A., 2012. "Maintenance scheduling of a protection system subject to imperfect inspection and replacement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 716-725.
    11. Maxim Finkelstein & Ilya Gertsbakh, 2015. "‘Time‐free’ preventive maintenance of systems with structures described by signatures," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 836-845, November.
    12. Maxim Finkelstein & Ji Hwan Cha, 2013. "Burn-in for Heterogeneous Populations," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Stochastic Modeling for Reliability, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 261-312, Springer.
    13. Maxim Finkelstein & Ilya Gertsbakh, 2016. "Preventive maintenance of multistate systems subject to shocks," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 283-291, March.
    14. Scarf, Philip A. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V., 2012. "Modelling quality in replacement and inspection maintenance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 372-381.
    15. Ji Hwan Cha & Jie Mi, 2011. "On a Stochastic Survival Model for a System Under Randomly Variable Environment," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 549-561, September.
    16. Austin J. Lemoine & Michael L. Wenocur, 1985. "On failure modeling," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 497-508, August.
    17. Maxim Finkelstein & Ji Hwan Cha, 2013. "Shocks as Burn-in," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Stochastic Modeling for Reliability, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 313-361, Springer.
    18. Qiu, Qingan & Cui, Lirong, 2019. "Optimal mission abort policy for systems subject to random shocks based on virtual age process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 11-20.
    19. van der Weide, J.A.M. & Pandey, Mahesh D., 2015. "A stochastic alternating renewal process model for unavailability analysis of standby safety equipment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 97-104.
    20. Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Scarf, Philip A. & de Almeida, Adiel T., 2011. "A study of a two-phase inspection policy for a preparedness system with a defective state and heterogeneous lifetime," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 627-635.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Santos, Augusto César de Jesus & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virgínio, 2022. "A study on the economic and environmental viability of second-hand items in maintenance policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Dai, Yuanshun, 2021. "Optimal shock-driven switching strategies with elements reuse in heterogeneous warm-standby systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    3. Chen, Liwei & Gao, Yansan & Dui, Hongyan & Xing, Liudong, 2021. "Importance measure-based maintenance optimization strategy for pod slewing system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    2. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2020. "On optimal life extension for degrading systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 487-495, June.
    3. Zhang, Fengxia & Shen, Jingyuan & Liao, Haitao & Ma, Yizhong, 2021. "Optimal preventive maintenance policy for a system subject to two-phase imperfect inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Alberti, Alexandre R. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Scarf, Philip & Silva, André L.O., 2018. "Modelling inspection and replacement quality for a protection system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 145-153.
    5. Santos, Augusto César de Jesus & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virgínio, 2022. "A study on the economic and environmental viability of second-hand items in maintenance policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    6. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2019. "Scheduling of imperfect inspections for reliability critical systems with shock-driven defects and delayed failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 89-98.
    7. Scarf, P.A. & Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Lopes, R.S., 2019. "Delay-time modelling of a critical system subject to random inspections," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 772-782.
    8. Li Yang & Yu Zhao & Xiaobing Ma & Qingan Qiu, 2018. "An optimal inspection and replacement policy for a two-unit system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 766-776, December.
    9. Maxim Finkelstein & Gregory Levitin, 2020. "On missions’ quality of performance for systems with partially or completely observable degradation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(5), pages 676-685, October.
    10. Alberti, A.R. & Neto, W.A. Ferreira & Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Santos, A.C.J., 2022. "Modelling a flexible two-phase inspection-maintenance policy for safety-critical systems considering revised and non-revised inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    11. Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Lopes, Rodrigo S. & Scarf, Philip A., 2021. "Inspection and replacement policy with a fixed periodic schedule," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    12. Zarezadeh, Somayeh & Ashrafi, Somayeh, 2019. "On preventive maintenance of networks with components subject to external shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. Zhang, Zihan & Yang, Li, 2020. "Postponed maintenance scheduling integrating state variation and environmental impact," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    14. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Xiang, Yanping, 2021. "Optimal aborting strategy for three-phase missions performed by multiple units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    15. Hazra, Nil Kamal & Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan, 2022. "On a hazard (failure) rate process with delays after shocks," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    16. Hashemi, M. & Asadi, M. & Zarezadeh, S., 2020. "Optimal maintenance policies for coherent systems with multi-type components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    17. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Dai, Yuanshun, 2020. "Mission abort policy optimization for series systems with overlapping primary and rescue subsystems operating in a random environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Lee, Hyunju & Cha, Ji Hwan, 2014. "On construction of general classes of bivariate distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 151-159.
    19. Zarezadeh, Somayeh & Asadi, Majid, 2019. "Coherent systems subject to multiple shocks with applications to preventative maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 124-132.
    20. Akcay, Alp, 2022. "An alert-assisted inspection policy for a production process with imperfect condition signals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 510-525.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:204:y:2020:i:c:s0951832020306190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.