IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v186y2019icp101-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A proactive operational risk identification and analysis framework based on the integration of ACAT and FRAM

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Weijun
  • He, Min
  • Sun, Yibo
  • Cao, Qinggui

Abstract

Risks in the industrial operation processes involve complex system elements such as human, machine, organization, information, as well as nonlinear coupling relationships among them. Traditional risk analysis methods focus on the cause-effect relationships between the system elements and accidents, while ignoring what the correct and proper relationships should be. For a proactive risk identification and analysis, learning from success is suggested instead of learning from post hoc accidents, which requires that risk analysis identifies the normal functions and their couplings. Therefore, system functioning has been a subject of interest in the field of risk analysis. The Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) has been an effective tool to reveal the couplings and dependent relationships among different functions. However, the functions identification and interaction analysis in the FRAM is limited because there is no consistent or explicit stop rule. For a detailed and rigorous description of functions, the Accident Causation Analysis and Taxonomy (ACAT) model is used to enrich the FRAM by generating functions based on a closed-loop control system. Two operation processes in the hazardous industries are used as illustrations. The results show that more functional constraints and deep contributing factors to accidents can be identified with the hybrid approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Weijun & He, Min & Sun, Yibo & Cao, Qinggui, 2019. "A proactive operational risk identification and analysis framework based on the integration of ACAT and FRAM," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 101-109.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:186:y:2019:i:c:p:101-109
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018303922
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patriarca, Riccardo & Bergström, Johan & Di Gravio, Giulio, 2017. "Defining the functional resonance analysis space: Combining Abstraction Hierarchy and FRAM," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 34-46.
    2. Anvarifar, Fatemeh & Voorendt, Mark Z. & Zevenbergen, Chris & Thissen, Wil, 2017. "An application of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to risk analysis of multifunctional flood defences in the Netherlands," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 130-141.
    3. Raben, Ditte Caroline & Bogh, Søren Bie & Viskum, Birgit & Mikkelsen, Kim L. & Hollnagel, Erik, 2018. "Learn from what goes right: A demonstration of a new systematic method for identification of leading indicators in healthcare," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 187-198.
    4. Herrera, I.A. & Woltjer, R., 2010. "Comparing a multi-linear (STEP) and systemic (FRAM) method for accident analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(12), pages 1269-1275.
    5. Raben, Ditte Caroline & Viskum, Birgit & Mikkelsen, Kim L. & Hounsgaard, Jeanette & Bogh, Søren Bie & Hollnagel, Erik, 2018. "Application of a non-linear model to understand healthcare processes: using the functional resonance analysis method on a case study of the early detection of sepsis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-11.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bugalia, Nikhil & Maemura, Yu & Ozawa, Kazumasa, 2021. "Characteristics of enhanced safety coordination between high-speed rail operators and manufacturers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Huang, Wencheng & Yin, Dezhi & Xu, Yifei & Zhang, Rui & Xu, Minhao, 2022. "Using N-K Model to quantitatively calculate the variability in Functional Resonance Analysis Method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Qiao, Wanguan, 2021. "Analysis and measurement of multifactor risk in underground coal mine accidents based on coupling theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    4. Guo, Yunlong & Jin, Yongxing & Hu, Shenping & Yang, Zaili & Xi, Yongtao & Han, Bing, 2023. "Risk evolution analysis of ship pilotage operation by an integrated model of FRAM and DBN," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Dongmei Huang & Weijun Li & Xikun Chang & Yunliang Tan, 2019. "Key Factors Identification and Risk Assessment for the Stability of Deep Surrounding Rock in Coal Roadway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jue & Wang, Hongwei, 2023. "Modeling and analyzing multiteam coordination task safety risks in socio-technical systems based on FRAM and multiplex network: Application in the construction industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Read, G.J.M. & Naweed, A. & Salmon, P.M., 2019. "Complexity on the rails: A systems-based approach to understanding safety management in rail transport," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 352-365.
    3. Steen, Riana & Ferreira, Pedro, 2020. "Resilient flood-risk management at the municipal level through the lens of the Functional Resonance Analysis Model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. Kim, Yoo Chan & Yoon, Wan Chul, 2021. "Quantitative representation of the functional resonance analysis method for risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    5. Patriarca, Riccardo & Falegnami, Andrea & Costantino, Francesco & Bilotta, Federico, 2018. "Resilience engineering for socio-technical risk analysis: Application in neuro-surgery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 321-335.
    6. Chao Yin, 2020. "Hazard assessment and regionalization of highway flood disasters in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 100(2), pages 535-550, January.
    7. Huang, Wencheng & Yin, Dezhi & Xu, Yifei & Zhang, Rui & Xu, Minhao, 2022. "Using N-K Model to quantitatively calculate the variability in Functional Resonance Analysis Method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Kaya, Gulsum Kubra & Hocaoglu, Mehmet Fatih, 2020. "Semi-quantitative application to the Functional Resonance Analysis Method for supporting safety management in a complex health-care process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Raben, Ditte Caroline & Viskum, Birgit & Mikkelsen, Kim L. & Hounsgaard, Jeanette & Bogh, Søren Bie & Hollnagel, Erik, 2018. "Application of a non-linear model to understand healthcare processes: using the functional resonance analysis method on a case study of the early detection of sepsis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-11.
    10. Patriarca, Riccardo & Bergström, Johan & Di Gravio, Giulio, 2017. "Defining the functional resonance analysis space: Combining Abstraction Hierarchy and FRAM," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 34-46.
    11. Yoon, Young Sik & Ham, Dong-Han & Yoon, Wan Chul, 2016. "Application of activity theory to analysis of human-related accidents: Method and case studies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 22-34.
    12. Chen, Hua-Peng & Mehrabani, Mehrdad Bahari, 2019. "Reliability analysis and optimum maintenance of coastal flood defences using probabilistic deterioration modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 163-174.
    13. Wu, Chao & Huang, Lang, 2019. "A new accident causation model based on information flow and its application in Tianjin Port fire and explosion accident," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 73-85.
    14. Bugalia, Nikhil & Maemura, Yu & Ozawa, Kazumasa, 2021. "Characteristics of enhanced safety coordination between high-speed rail operators and manufacturers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    15. Woltjer, Rogier & Pinska-Chauvin, Ella & Laursen, Tom & Josefsson, Billy, 2015. "Towards understanding work-as-done in air traffic management safety assessment and design," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 115-130.
    16. Foreman, Veronica L. & Favaró, Francesca M. & Saleh, Joseph H. & Johnson, Christopher W., 2015. "Software in military aviation and drone mishaps: Analysis and recommendations for the investigation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 101-111.
    17. Monkhouse, Helen E. & Habli, Ibrahim & McDermid, John, 2020. "An enhanced vehicle control model for assessing highly automated driving safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    18. Zinetullina, Altyngul & Yang, Ming & Khakzad, Nima & Golman, Boris & Li, Xinhong, 2021. "Quantitative resilience assessment of chemical process systems using functional resonance analysis method and Dynamic Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    19. Hussein Slim & Sylvie Nadeau, 2020. "A Mixed Rough Sets/Fuzzy Logic Approach for Modelling Systemic Performance Variability with FRAM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Liu, Jintao & Schmid, Felix & Zheng, Wei & Zhu, Jiebei, 2019. "Understanding railway operational accidents using network theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 218-231.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:186:y:2019:i:c:p:101-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.