IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pubeco/v16y1981i1p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outcomes of voting and planning : Condorcet, Weber and Rawls locations

Author

Listed:
  • Hansen, Pierre
  • Thisse, Jacques-Francois

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Hansen, Pierre & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 1981. "Outcomes of voting and planning : Condorcet, Weber and Rawls locations," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:16:y:1981:i:1:p:1-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0047-2727(81)90039-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabrielle Demange, 2012. "Majority relation and median representative ordering," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 95-109, March.
    2. Masashi Umezawa, 2012. "The replacement principle for the provision of multiple public goods on tree networks," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(2), pages 211-235, February.
    3. Kazuo Yamaguchi, 2016. "Borda winner in facility location problems on sphere," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(4), pages 893-898, April.
    4. Madhuparna Karmokar & Souvik Roy & Ton Storcken, 2021. "Necessary and sufficient conditions for pairwise majority decisions on path-connected domains," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 313-336, October.
    5. Itai Feigenbaum & Jay Sethuraman & Chun Ye, 2017. "Approximately Optimal Mechanisms for Strategyproof Facility Location: Minimizing L p Norm of Costs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 434-447, May.
    6. Rhim, Hosun & Ho, Teck H. & Karmarkar, Uday S., 2003. "Competitive location, production, and market selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 211-228, August.
    7. Alain Trannoy, 2011. "Equity Dimensions of Transport Policy," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 26, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Lihua Chen & Xiaotie Deng & Qizhi Fang & Feng Tian, 2005. "Condorcet Winners for Public Goods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 229-242, July.
    9. Kress, Dominik & Pesch, Erwin, 2012. "Sequential competitive location on networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 483-499.
    10. Stefano Vannucci, 2015. "Network geometry and the scope of the median voter theorem," Department of Economics University of Siena 704, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    11. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & da Silveira, Giovani J.C. & Drezner, Zvi, 2016. "Democratic elections and centralized decisions: Condorcet and Approval Voting compared with Median and Coverage locations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 195-203.
    12. Thomas D. Pol & Ekko C. Ierland & Silke Gabbert, 2017. "Economic analysis of adaptive strategies for flood risk management under climate change," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 267-285, February.
    13. Nikolai Krivulin, 2017. "Using tropical optimization to solve constrained minimax single-facility location problems with rectilinear distance," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 493-518, October.
    14. Schummer, James & Vohra, Rakesh V., 2002. "Strategy-proof Location on a Network," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 405-428, June.
    15. Kawamori, Tomohiko & Yamaguchi, Kazuo, 2010. "Outcomes of bargaining and planning in single facility location problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 38-45, January.
    16. Zvi Drezner & Mozart B. C. Menezes, 2016. "The wisdom of voters: evaluating the Weber objective in the plane at the Condorcet solution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 205-226, November.
    17. Yamaguchi, Kazuo, 2011. "Location of an undesirable facility on a network: A bargaining approach," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 104-108, September.
    18. Infante-Macias, R. & Munoz-Perez, J., 1995. "Competitive location with rectilinear distances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 77-85, January.
    19. Noga Alon & Michal Feldman & Ariel D. Procaccia & Moshe Tennenholtz, 2010. "Strategyproof Approximation of the Minimax on Networks," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 513-526, August.
    20. Kazuo Yamaguchi, 2022. "Spatial bargaining in rectilinear facility location problem," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 69-104, July.
    21. Hans Peters & Souvik Roy & Soumyarup Sadhukhan, 2021. "Unanimous and Strategy-Proof Probabilistic Rules for Single-Peaked Preference Profiles on Graphs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 811-833, May.
    22. Campos Rodriguez, Clara M. & Moreno Perez, Jose A., 2003. "Relaxation of the Condorcet and Simpson conditions in voting location," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(3), pages 673-683, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:16:y:1981:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505578 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.