IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v131y2011i1p175-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The power of dimensional analysis in production systems design

Author

Listed:
  • Miragliotta, Giovanni

Abstract

Dimensional Analysis (DA) is a well-known methodology in physics, chemistry and other traditional engineering areas. In its simplest form, DA is used to check the meaningfulness of a set of equations (dimensional homogeneity). In the last century, the dimensional theory has been profoundly investigated: its highest achievement is the Buckingham theorem (or pi-theorem), which states that any equation modelling a physical problem can be rearranged in terms of dimensionless ratios, thus saving variables to be handled, and especially enriching the inner physical knowledge of the studied phenomenon. In this paper we investigate how DA can be applied to Operations Management (OM) topics and which benefits it can bring to researchers in this area. A literature review is performed to clarify the main operative issues regarding DA application (assumptions and limitations); then existing applications of DA to OM are explored, pointing out that few researchers have tried to apply this methodology in the OM research field. Stemming from this analysis, we applied the pi-theorem to the design of a Flexible Manufacturing System. A complex problem, requiring 13 dimensional quantities to be expressed, is first studied via simulation; then DA is applied, reducing the number of variables to 9 dimensionless ratios. The reduced problem has a suitable size to be analytically explored and a regression model is formulated which, compared with the simulation study, offers the same precision in analysing the FMS behaviour, being more compact and powerful. This application shows the potential of DA in OM research, and will hopefully draw the attention of researches to this powerful, but unfamiliar and therefore neglected, methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Miragliotta, Giovanni, 2011. "The power of dimensional analysis in production systems design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 175-182, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:131:y:2011:i:1:p:175-182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(10)00315-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eliezer Naddor, 1966. "Dimensions in Operations Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 508-514, June.
    2. Perona, Marco & Miragliotta, Giovanni, 2004. "Complexity management and supply chain performance assessment. A field study and a conceptual framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 103-115, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tang, Raymond Chong Ong & Jang, Jer-Huan & Lan, Tzu-Hsuan & Wu, Jung-Chen & Yan, Wei-Mon & Sangeetha, Thangavel & Wang, Chin-Tsan & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Ong, Zhi Chao, 2020. "Review on design factors of microbial fuel cells using Buckingham's Pi Theorem," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viet, Nguyen Quoc & Behdani, Behzad & Bloemhof, Jacqueline, 2018. "Value of Information to Improve Daily Operations in High-Density Logistics," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(1), January.
    2. Park, Kijung & Okudan Kremer, Gül E., 2015. "Assessment of static complexity in design and manufacturing of a product family and its impact on manufacturing performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 215-232.
    3. Vogel, Wolfgang & Lasch, Rainer, 2015. "Approach for Complexity Management in Variant-rich Product Development," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 97-140, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    4. Chowdhury, Md Maruf H. & Quaddus, Mohammed, 2017. "Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 185-204.
    5. Becker, Jörg & Vilkov, Lev & Weiß, Burkhard & Winkelmann, Axel, 2010. "A model based approach for calculating the process driven business value of RFID investments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 358-371, October.
    6. Piran, Fabio Antonio Sartori & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco & Camargo, Luis Felipe Riehs & Viero, Carlos Frederico & Dresch, Aline & Cauchick-Miguel, Paulo Augusto, 2016. "Product modularization and effects on efficiency: An analysis of a bus manufacturer using data envelopment analysis (DEA)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1-13.
    7. Germán Herrera Vidal & Jairo R. Coronado-Hernández & Claudia Minnaard, 2023. "Measuring manufacturing system complexity: a literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(7), pages 2865-2888, October.
    8. Larisa Ivascu & Waqas Ali & Rimsha Khalid & Mohsin Raza, 2022. "The Impact of Competitive Strategies on Performance of Banking Sector; The Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility and Operational Excellence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Meyer, Christian, 2005. "Development of an Approach for Analyzing Supply Chain Complexity," MPRA Paper 5284, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Roberto Dominguez & Salvatore Cannella, 2020. "Insights on Multi-Agent Systems Applications for Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, March.
    11. Saccani, Nicola & Perona, Marco & Bacchetti, Andrea, 2017. "The total cost of ownership of durable consumer goods: A conceptual model and an empirical application," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 1-13.
    12. Everette S. Gardner, 2004. "Dimensional Analysis of Airline Quality," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 272-279, August.
    13. Golini, Ruggero & Kalchschmidt, Matteo, 2015. "Managing inventories in global sourcing contexts: A contingency perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 64-78.
    14. Chang, Sheng-Lin & Wang, Reay-Chen & Wang, Shih-Yuan, 2006. "Applying fuzzy linguistic quantifier to select supply chain partners at different phases of product life cycle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 348-359, April.
    15. Chiang, Chi, 2010. "An order expediting policy for continuous review systems with manufacturing lead-time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 526-531, June.
    16. Fabricio Eidelwein & Fabio Antonio Sartori Piran & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & Aline Dresch & Luis Henrique Rodrigues, 2018. "Exploratory Analysis of Modularization Strategy Based on the Theory of Constraints Thinking Process," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(2), pages 111-122, June.
    17. Delic, Mia & Eyers, Daniel R., 2020. "The effect of additive manufacturing adoption on supply chain flexibility and performance: An empirical analysis from the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    18. Wang, Jian & Cao, De-bi, 2008. "Relationships between two approaches for planning manufacturing strategy: A strategic approach and a paradigmatic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 349-361, October.
    19. da Silva Gonçalves Zangiski, Marlene Aparecida & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E., 2013. "Organizational competence building and development: Contributions to operations management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 76-89.
    20. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Ruiz-Hernández, Diego & Chen, Yen-Tsang, 2021. "On the validity and practical relevance of a measure for structural complexity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:131:y:2011:i:1:p:175-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.