IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v462y2016icp1178-1188.html

Opinion evolution and rare events in an open community

Author

Listed:
  • Ye, Yusong
  • Yang, Zhuoqin
  • Zhang, Zili

Abstract

There are many multi-stable phenomena in society. To explain these multi-stable phenomena, we have studied opinion evolution in an open community. We focus on probability of transition (or the mean transition time) that the system transfer from one state to another. We suggest a bistable model to provide an interpretation of these phenomena. The quasi-potential method that we used is the most important method to calculate the transition time and it can be used to determine the whole probability density. We study the condition of bistability and then discuss rare events in a multi-stable system. In our model, we find that two parameters, “temperature” and “persuading intensity,” influence the behavior of the system; a suitable “persuading intensity” and low “temperature” make the system more stable. This means that the transition rarely happens. The asymmetric phenomenon caused by “public-opinion” is also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye, Yusong & Yang, Zhuoqin & Zhang, Zili, 2016. "Opinion evolution and rare events in an open community," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 1178-1188.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:462:y:2016:i:c:p:1178-1188
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.06.084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437116303521
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2016.06.084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaizoji, Taisei, 2000. "Speculative bubbles and crashes in stock markets: an interacting-agent model of speculative activity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 493-506.
    2. Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Józef Sznajd, 2000. "Opinion Evolution In Closed Community," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(06), pages 1157-1165.
    3. Cheng Lv & Xiaoguang Li & Fangting Li & Tiejun Li, 2014. "Constructing the Energy Landscape for Genetic Switching System Driven by Intrinsic Noise," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ye, Yusong & Jiao, Xiaopei & Han, Mingjun & Yang, Zhuoqin, 2026. "The phase polarization induced by homogeneous structure of evolving random hypergraph," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 687(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quanbo Zha & Gang Kou & Hengjie Zhang & Haiming Liang & Xia Chen & Cong-Cong Li & Yucheng Dong, 2020. "Opinion dynamics in finance and business: a literature review and research opportunities," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Maria Boguta & Eric Jarpe, 2010. "A new space-time model for volatility clustering in the financial market," Papers 1002.0609, arXiv.org.
    3. Düring, B. & Toscani, G., 2007. "Hydrodynamics from kinetic models of conservative economies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 384(2), pages 493-506.
    4. Christoph J. Borner & Ingo Hoffmann & John H. Stiebel, 2024. "A closer look at the chemical potential of an ideal agent system," Papers 2401.09233, arXiv.org.
    5. Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Janusz Szwabiński & Rafał Weron, 2014. "Is the Person-Situation Debate Important for Agent-Based Modeling and Vice-Versa?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-7, November.
    6. Kaye-Blake, William & Li, Frank Y. & Martin, A. McLeish & McDermott, Alan & Neil, Hayley & Rains, Scott, 2009. "A review of Multi-Agent Simulation Models in Agriculture," 2009 Conference, August 27-28, 2009, Nelson, New Zealand 97165, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    7. Krawczyk, M.J. & Dydejczyk, A. & Kułakowski, K., 2014. "The Simmel effect and babies’ names," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 395(C), pages 384-391.
    8. Shang, Lihui & Zhao, Mingming & Ai, Jun & Su, Zhan, 2021. "Opinion evolution in the Sznajd model on interdependent chains," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    9. Han, Wenchen & Gao, Shun & Huang, Changwei & Yang, Junzhong, 2022. "Non-consensus states in circular opinion model with repulsive interaction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).
    10. Wu, Qiong & Guo, Ge & Li, Xiaogang & Singh, Rajesh & Zhang, Ting, 2025. "Bitcoin’s fundamental value and speculative behavior: A new framework for price dynamics," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    11. Couthures, Anthony & Satheeskumar Varma, Vineeth & Lasaulce, Samson & Morărescu, Irinel - Constantin, 2024. "Analysis of an opinion dynamics model coupled with an external environmental dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 189(P2).
    12. Lu, Xi & Mo, Hongming & Deng, Yong, 2015. "An evidential opinion dynamics model based on heterogeneous social influential power," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 98-107.
    13. E. Samanidou & E. Zschischang & D. Stauffer & T. Lux, 2001. "Microscopic Models of Financial Markets," Papers cond-mat/0110354, arXiv.org.
    14. Célestin Coquidé & José Lages & Dima Shepelyansky, 2024. "Opinion Formation in the World Trade Network," Post-Print hal-04461784, HAL.
    15. Xiaolan Qian & Wenchen Han & Junzhong Yang, 2024. "From the DeGroot Model to the DeGroot-Non-Consensus Model: The Jump States and the Frozen Fragment States," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Yuichi IKEDA & Hiroshi YOSHIKAWA, 2018. "Macroprudential Modeling Based on Spin Dynamics in a Supply Chain Network," Discussion papers 18045, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    17. Dimitris Tsintsaris & Milan Tsompanoglou & Evangelos Ioannidis, 2024. "Dynamics of Social Influence and Knowledge in Networks: Sociophysics Models and Applications in Social Trading, Behavioral Finance and Business," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, April.
    18. Maletić, Slobodan & Rajković, Milan, 2014. "Consensus formation on a simplicial complex of opinions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 111-120.
    19. Pawel Sobkowicz, 2013. "Quantitative Agent Based Model of User Behavior in an Internet Discussion Forum," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Yuichi Ikeda, 2020. "An Interacting Agent Model of Economic Crisis," Papers 2001.11843, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:462:y:2016:i:c:p:1178-1188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.