IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v93y2020ics0264837718315515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional economic transformation: Changing land and resource access on the West Coast of New Zealand’s South Island

Author

Listed:
  • Nel, Etienne
  • Connelly, Sean

Abstract

The West Coast region of New Zealand has experienced significant structural economic changes since the 1980s. These changes have been a result of state imposed land use restrictions that limited productivist activities such as logging and mining, which in turn have been overlain by the effects of changes in national and global resource demand. This has led to both job loss and local resentment to what is seen to be external political and environmental interference in the region. Such changes overlay on-going boom-and-bust cycles experienced in the region’s resource dependent communities and the state’s pursuit of neo-liberalism from the 1980s, leading to the loss of state support and employment in the region. Regional path-dependence and ‘lock-in’ centred on productivist activities and the slow realisation of the need to diversify the economy have not helped. The region has under-performed in comparison with national trends economically and demographically reflecting and reinforcing local path dependence. The gradual growth of the service and tourism economies marks a new use for land resources and slow structural economic change. However, in the absence of governance processes that allow for collaborative planning to resolve conflicts over future trajectories for the region, conflicts over land uses, resources and access are likely to persist.

Suggested Citation

  • Nel, Etienne & Connelly, Sean, 2020. "Regional economic transformation: Changing land and resource access on the West Coast of New Zealand’s South Island," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:93:y:2020:i:c:s0264837718315515
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718315515
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dominique Foray, 2016. "On the policy space of smart specialization strategies," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 1428-1437, August.
    2. Fleming, David A. & Measham, Thomas G. & Paredes, Dusan, 2015. "Understanding the resource curse (or blessing) across national and regional scales: Theory, empirical challenges and an application," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(4), October.
    3. P. Ali Memon & Geoff Wilson, 2007. "Contesting governance of indigenous forests in New Zealand: The case of the West Coast Forest Accord," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(6), pages 745-764.
    4. Bess, Randall, 2010. "Maintaining a balance between resource utilisation and protection of the marine environment in New Zealand," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 690-698, May.
    5. Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, 2012. "IGCC 2012 Annual Report," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt9sq8w042, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    6. Wu, JunJie & Cho, Seong-Hoon, 2007. "The effect of local land use regulations on urban development in the Western United States," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 69-86, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Jing & Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Zhengfeng & Ning, Shanshan & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2024. "The decoupling relationship between land use efficiency and carbon emissions in China: An analysis using the Socio-Ecological Systems (SES) framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2021. "Overlapping of mine sites and highway route in Turkey: Evaluation in terms of mining land use criteria and land-use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. Sharma, Amit & Messerli, Hannah & Lin, Michael S., 2023. "Land use regulations and small tourism enterprises," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Bin Yang & Zhanqi Wang & Bo Zhang & Di Zhang, 2020. "Allocation Efficiency, Influencing Factors and Optimization Path of Rural Land Resources: A Case Study in Fang County of Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suarsana, Laura & Schneider, Tina & Warsewa, Günter, 2023. "Do regional innovation strategies meet societal challenges? A comparative analysis across regions in Belgium, Germany, Netherlands and Finland," Schriftenreihe Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft 40/2023, Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft (IAW), Universität Bremen und Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen.
    2. Li, Tianyu & Yue, Xiao-Guang & Waheed, Humayun & Yıldırım, Bilal, 2023. "Can energy efficiency and natural resources foster economic growth? Evidence from BRICS countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Bannor, Frank & Magambo, Isaiah & Mubenga-Tshitaka, Jean Luc & Mduduzi, Biyase & Osei-Acheampong, Bismark, 2023. "Do effective governance and political stability facilitate the promotion of economic growth through natural resource rents? Evidence from Africa," MPRA Paper 116651, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Omar H. M. N. Bashar & Omar K. M. R. Bashar, 2020. "Resource abundance, financial crisis and economic growth: did resource‐rich countries fare better during the global financial crisis?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(2), pages 376-395, April.
    5. Batdelger, Tuvshintugs & Zagdbazar, Manlaibaatar, 2022. "Does mining improve rural livelihood?: Evidence from Mongolia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Sofia Wixe & Pia Nilsson & Lucia Naldi & Hans Westlund, 2023. "The role of collaboration and external knowledge for innovation in small food firms," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(1), pages 135-155, February.
    7. Fabio Blanco-Mesa & Anna M. Gil-Lafuente & José M. Merigó, 2018. "Subjective stakeholder dynamics relationships treatment: a methodological approach using fuzzy decision-making," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 441-472, December.
    8. Mona ROMAN & Timo NYBERG, 2017. "Openness and Continuous Collaboration as the Foundation for Entrepreneurial Discovery Process in Finnish Regions," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(4), pages 517-531, December.
    9. Wei, Xuecheng & Hu, Weihua, 2023. "Revisiting resources curse hypothesis in China: Exploring the asymmetric effect of green investment and green innovation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    10. Andrew Johnston & Peter Wells, 2020. "Assessing the role of universities in a place-based Industrial Strategy: Evidence from the UK," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(4), pages 384-402, June.
    11. Iris Wanzenböck & Koen Frenken, 2018. "The subsidiarity principle: Turning challenge-oriented innovation policy on its head," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1806, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2018.
    12. Paul Gottlieb, 2013. "Agricultural preservation, large-lot zoning, and real estate development in New Jersey, USA," ERSA conference papers ersa13p513, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Arratia-Solar, Andrea & Paredes, Dusan, 2023. "Commodity price and fatalities in mining – Evidence from copper regions in Chile," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Guillaume POUYANNE & Frederic GASCHET, 2013. "The Effect Of Current And Future Land Use On House Prices," ERSA conference papers ersa13p249, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Opoku Adabor & Emmanuel Buabeng & Raoul Fani Djomo Choumbou, 2021. "Asymmetrical effect of oil and gas resource rent on economic growth: Empirical evidence from Ghana," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 1971355-197, January.
    16. Wang, Haotian & Hao, Liang & Wang, Weizheng & Chen, Xingyu, 2023. "Natural resources lineage, high technology exports and economic performance: RCEP economies perspective of human capital and energy resources efficiency," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    17. Ouoba, Youmanli, 2016. "Natural resources: Funds and economic performance of resource-rich countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 108-116.
    18. Alejandro Ome & Gerson Javier Pérez-Valbuena, 2022. "Natural Resource Windfalls: Effects in Non-producing Areas," Documentos de Trabajo Sobre Economía Regional y Urbana 20420, Banco de la República, Economía Regional.
    19. Nathalie Colasanti & Chiara Fantauzzi & Rocco Frondizi, 2021. "Innovating Public Service Delivery Through Crowdsourcing: What Role for The Third Sector and Civil Society?," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, February.
    20. David L. Rigby & Christoph Roesler & Dieter Kogler & Ron Boschma & Pierre-Alexandre Balland, 2019. "Do EU regions benefit from smart specialization?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1931, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2019.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:93:y:2020:i:c:s0264837718315515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.