IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v88y2019ics0264837718313887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regrowing forests contribution to law compliance and carbon storage in private properties of the Brazilian Amazon

Author

Listed:
  • Hissa, Leticia de Barros Viana
  • Aguiar, Ana Paula Dutra
  • Camargo, Rafael Rodrigues
  • Lima, Leticia Santos de
  • Gollnow, Florian
  • Lakes, Tobia

Abstract

The viability of the climate pledges made by Brazil at the COP21 in Paris, 2015, heavily depends on the success of the country policies related to forest governance. Particularly, there are high expectations that the enforcement of the Brazilian Forest Code (BFC) will drive large-scale forest recovery and carbon mitigation. In this study, we quantified the potential role that ongoing forest regeneration may play in offsetting deficits from private properties with less vegetation cover than determined by the BFC, considering different law implementation settings. Focusing on the Amazon Biome, we overlaid property level data from a mandatory registry (≈ 250,000 properties) onto land cover maps to quantify on-site forest deficit offsets by ongoing forest recovery. Similarly, we estimated the share of regrowing forests in private properties potentially eligible for off-site deficit compensation (i.e. via market-based forest certificates trade). Regrowing forests could reduce, on-site, 3.2 Mha of forests deficits, decreasing non-compliance from private properties by 35%. Likewise, forest certificates availability increased by 3.4 Mha when we included regrowing forests in the calculations. This means an increase in the forest certificate offer-demand ratio from 0.9 to 2.0. On the one hand, trading certificates issued from recovering forests may represent a low-cost strategy for compliance with the BFC, a pathway for achieving restoration targets, and an additional source of income for landholders. To meet this potential, it is necessary to better conceptualize second-growth forests, advancing the poor definitions presented by the BFC, and offer an operational basis for their protection. On the other hand, including regrowing forests’ certificates in compensation schemes may further restrain the potential of the trading mechanism for conservation of unprotected old-growth forests and lead to positive net carbon emissions. We highlight that the BFC implementation must be carefully regulated to maximize synergies between compliance and forest resources conservation and enhancement.

Suggested Citation

  • Hissa, Leticia de Barros Viana & Aguiar, Ana Paula Dutra & Camargo, Rafael Rodrigues & Lima, Leticia Santos de & Gollnow, Florian & Lakes, Tobia, 2019. "Regrowing forests contribution to law compliance and carbon storage in private properties of the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:88:y:2019:i:c:s0264837718313887
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718313887
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brenda Brito, 2017. "Potential trajectories of the upcoming forest trading mechanism in Pará State, Brazilian Amazon," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Celentano, Danielle & Rousseau, Guillaume X. & Muniz, Francisca Helena & Varga, István van Deursen & Martinez, Carlos & Carneiro, Marcelo Sampaio & Miranda, Magda V.C. & Barros, Márcia N.R. & Freitas,, 2017. "Towards zero deforestation and forest restoration in the Amazon region of Maranhão state, Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 692-698.
    3. Peter D. Richards & Leah VanWey, 2016. "Farm-scale distribution of deforestation and remaining forest cover in Mato Grosso," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(4), pages 418-425, April.
    4. Gollnow, Florian & Hissa, Leticia de Barros Viana & Rufin, Philippe & Lakes, Tobia, 2018. "Property-level direct and indirect deforestation for soybean production in the Amazon region of Mato Grosso, Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 377-385.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lemos, Cassia M.G. & Beyer, Hawthorne L. & Runting, Rebecca K. & Andrade, Pedro R. & Aguiar, Ana P.D., 2023. "Multicriteria optimization to develop cost-effective pes-schemes to restore multiple environmental benefits in the Brazilian Atlantic forest," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Preto, Mayra de Freitas & Garcia, Andrea Santos & Nakai, Érica Silva & Casarin, Laura Piacentini & Vilela, Vívian Maria de Faria Nasser & Ballester, Maria Victoria Ramos, 2022. "The role of environmental legislation and land use patterns on riparian deforestation dynamics in an Amazonian agricultural frontier (MT, Brazil)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    2. Garrett, R.D. & Grabs, J. & Cammelli, F. & Gollnow, F. & Levy, S.A., 2022. "Should payments for environmental services be used to implement zero-deforestation supply chain policies? The case of soy in the Brazilian Cerrado," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Nelson Villoria & Rachael Garrett & Florian Gollnow & Kimberly Carlson, 2022. "Leakage does not fully offset soy supply-chain efforts to reduce deforestation in Brazil," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Reginaldo Carvalho Santos & Carlos Antonio Silva Junior & Leandro Denis Battirola & Mendelson Lima, 2022. "Importance of legislation for maintaining forests on private properties in the Brazilian Cerrado," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3356-3370, March.
    5. Henrique Luis Godinho Cassol & Egidio Arai & Edson Eyji Sano & Andeise Cerqueira Dutra & Tânia Beatriz Hoffmann & Yosio Edemir Shimabukuro, 2020. "Maximum Fraction Images Derived from Year-Based Project for On-Board Autonomy-Vegetation (PROBA-V) Data for the Rapid Assessment of Land Use and Land Cover Areas in Mato Grosso State, Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Arvor, Damien & Silgueiro, Vinicius & Manzon Nunes, Gustavo & Nabucet, Jean & Pereira Dias, André, 2021. "The 2008 map of consolidated rural areas in the Brazilian Legal Amazon state of Mato Grosso: Accuracy assessment and implications for the environmental regularization of rural properties," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    7. Amintas Brandão Jr. & Lisa Rausch & América Paz Durán & Ciniro Costa Jr. & Seth A. Spawn & Holly K. Gibbs, 2020. "Estimating the Potential for Conservation and Farming in the Amazon and Cerrado under Four Policy Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Benzeev, Rayna & Wiens, Ashton & Piotto, Daniel & Newton, Peter, 2023. "Property size and forest cover were key determinants of forest restoration in Southern Bahia in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Daniella Tiemi Sasaki Okida & Osmar Abílio de Carvalho Júnior & Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho & Roberto Arnaldo Trancoso Gomes & Renato Fontes Guimarães, 2021. "Relationship between Land Property Security and Brazilian Amazon Deforestation in the Mato Grosso State during the Period 2013–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Brito, Brenda, 2020. "The pioneer market for forest law compliance in Paragominas, Eastern Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Mello, Kaline de & Fendrich, Arthur Nicolaus & Borges-Matos, Clarice & Brites, Alice Dantas & Tavares, Paulo André & da Rocha, Gustavo Casoni & Matsumoto, Marcelo & Rodrigues, Ricardo Ribeiro & Joly, , 2021. "Integrating ecological equivalence for native vegetation compensation: A methodological approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Zimbres, Barbara & Machado, Ricardo B. & Peres, Carlos A., 2018. "Anthropogenic drivers of headwater and riparian forest loss and degradation in a highly fragmented southern Amazonian landscape," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 354-363.
    13. Suhyun Jung & Cecilie Dyngeland & Lisa Rausch & Laura Vang Rasmussen, 2022. "Brazilian Land Registry Impacts on Land Use Conversion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 340-363, January.
    14. Mullan, Katrina & Caviglia-Harris, Jill L. & Sills, Erin O., 2021. "Sustainability of agricultural production following deforestation in the tropics: Evidence on the value of newly-deforested, long-deforested and forested land in the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    15. Adeline M. Maciel & Michelle C. A. Picoli & Lubia Vinhas & Gilberto Camara, 2020. "Identifying Land Use Change Trajectories in Brazil’s Agricultural Frontier," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Zhang, Yajuan & Zhang, Lijin & Wang, Huan & Wang, Yueyao & Ding, Jiaqi & Shen, Jiashu & Wang, Zheng & Liu, Yinglu & Liang, Chenyu & Li, Shuangcheng, 2022. "Reconstructing deforestation patterns in China from 2000 to 2019," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).
    17. van der Hoff, Richard & Rajão, Raoni, 2020. "The politics of environmental market instruments: Coalition building and knowledge filtering in the regulation of forest certificates trading in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:88:y:2019:i:c:s0264837718313887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.