IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v103y2021ics0264837721000053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The 2008 map of consolidated rural areas in the Brazilian Legal Amazon state of Mato Grosso: Accuracy assessment and implications for the environmental regularization of rural properties

Author

Listed:
  • Arvor, Damien
  • Silgueiro, Vinicius
  • Manzon Nunes, Gustavo
  • Nabucet, Jean
  • Pereira Dias, André

Abstract

Accurate land use mapping in the Amazon is crucial to support the implementation of environmental policies. The new Brazilian Forest Code published in 2012 defines a “consolidated rural area” (CRA) as an area within a rural property and occupied by humans prior to July 22, 2008. Environmental infractions that occurred before that date are granted amnesty and landowners are exempted from the obligation to restore the degraded areas. To assess the compliance of rural property owners with the environmental legislation, the Brazilian government created the Rural Environmental Registry (CAR), for mandatory electronic self-declaration of all rural private properties. The successful implementation of the CAR relies on the accurate mapping of CRA before the reference date of July 2008. The objective of the present paper is to assess the accuracy of the 2008 map of consolidated rural areas (CRA2008) that is the result of a fruitful collaboration between a non-governmental organization (NGO), a state administration and academic institutions. The CRA2008 map was produced by photo-interpretation of high resolution remote sensing images and validated after comparison with 90 aerial photographs. The validation metrics (overall accuracy = 0.926, Kappa index = 0.851 and F-score = 0.924) confirmed the reliability of the CRA2008 map. Most errors identified were due to imprecision at the edges between CRA and native vegetation because of different spatial resolutions of the CRA2008 and the aerial photographs. Consequently, the results were slightly lower (although still high; Kappa = 0.835) in the Amazon biome where landscapes are more fragmented. Finally, in a context of severe criticisms expressed by national government leaders towards Brazilian research institutions and NGOs, our results clearly demonstrate the benefits of combining institutional efforts and of working in synergy to produce relevant information with the aim of ensuring the implementation of public environmental policies and thereby improving land use sustainability in the Amazon.

Suggested Citation

  • Arvor, Damien & Silgueiro, Vinicius & Manzon Nunes, Gustavo & Nabucet, Jean & Pereira Dias, André, 2021. "The 2008 map of consolidated rural areas in the Brazilian Legal Amazon state of Mato Grosso: Accuracy assessment and implications for the environmental regularization of rural properties," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:103:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721000053
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721000053
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neli Aparecida de Mello-Théry & Eduardo de Lima Caldas & Beatriz M. Funatsu & Damien Arvor & Vincent Dubreuil, 2020. "Climate Change and Public Policies in the Brazilian Amazon State of Mato Grosso: Perceptions and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Jeff Tollefson, 2012. "Brazil set to cut forest protection," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7396), pages 19-19, May.
    3. Silva, C.A. & Lima, Mendelson, 2018. "Soy Moratorium in Mato Grosso: Deforestation undermines the agreement," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 540-542.
    4. Gollnow, Florian & Hissa, Leticia de Barros Viana & Rufin, Philippe & Lakes, Tobia, 2018. "Property-level direct and indirect deforestation for soybean production in the Amazon region of Mato Grosso, Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 377-385.
    5. Roitman, Iris & Cardoso Galli Vieira, Ludgero & Baiocchi Jacobson, Tamiel Khan & da Cunha Bustamante, Mercedes Maria & Silva Marcondes, Nívea Jorgia & Cury, Kátia & Silva Estevam, Luciana & da Costa R, 2018. "Rural Environmental Registry: An innovative model for land-use and environmental policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 95-102.
    6. Milhorance, Carolina & Bursztyn, Marcel, 2018. "Emerging hybrid governance to foster low-emission rural development in the amazon frontier," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 11-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adeline M. Maciel & Michelle C. A. Picoli & Lubia Vinhas & Gilberto Camara, 2020. "Identifying Land Use Change Trajectories in Brazil’s Agricultural Frontier," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Rocha, Samuel José Silva Soares da & Comini, Indira Bifano & Morais Júnior, Vicente Toledo Machado de & Schettini, Bruno Leão Said & Villanova, Paulo Henrique & Alves, Eliana Boaventura Bernardes Mour, 2020. "Ecological ICMS enables forest restoration in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Garrett, R.D. & Grabs, J. & Cammelli, F. & Gollnow, F. & Levy, S.A., 2022. "Should payments for environmental services be used to implement zero-deforestation supply chain policies? The case of soy in the Brazilian Cerrado," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Nelson Villoria & Rachael Garrett & Florian Gollnow & Kimberly Carlson, 2022. "Leakage does not fully offset soy supply-chain efforts to reduce deforestation in Brazil," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Henrique Luis Godinho Cassol & Egidio Arai & Edson Eyji Sano & Andeise Cerqueira Dutra & Tânia Beatriz Hoffmann & Yosio Edemir Shimabukuro, 2020. "Maximum Fraction Images Derived from Year-Based Project for On-Board Autonomy-Vegetation (PROBA-V) Data for the Rapid Assessment of Land Use and Land Cover Areas in Mato Grosso State, Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Leila Dal Moro & Laércio Stolfo Maculan & Dieisson Pivoto & Grace Tibério Cardoso & Diana Pinto & Bashir Adelodun & Brian William Bodah & M. Santosh & Marluse Guedes Bortoluzzi & Elisiane Branco & Alc, 2022. "Geospatial Analysis with Landsat Series and Sentinel-3B OLCI Satellites to Assess Changes in Land Use and Water Quality over Time in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Carlos Henrique Pires Luiz & Valdir Adilson Steinke, 2022. "Recent Environmental Legislation in Brazil and the Impact on Cerrado Deforestation Rates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Porro, Roberto & Porro, Noemi Sakiara Miyasaka, 2022. "State-led social and environmental policy failure in a Brazilian forest frontier: Sustainable Development Project in Anapu, Pará," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Erbaugh, James & Bierbaum, Rosina & Castilleja, Guillermo & da Fonseca, Gustavo A.B. & Hansen, Steffen Cole Brandstrup, 2019. "Toward sustainable agriculture in the tropics," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 158-162.
    10. Mota, Pedro Henrique Santos & Rocha, Samuel José Silva Soares da & Castro, Nero Lemos Martins de & Marcatti, Gustavo Eduardo & França, Luciano Cavalcante de Jesus & Schettini, Bruno Leão Said & Villan, 2019. "Forest fire hazard zoning in Mato Grosso State, Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Delaroche, Martin & Le Tourneau, François-Michel & Daugeard, Marion, 2022. "How vegetation classification and mapping may influence conservation: The example of Brazil’s Native Vegetation Protection Law," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    12. Daniella Tiemi Sasaki Okida & Osmar Abílio de Carvalho Júnior & Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho & Roberto Arnaldo Trancoso Gomes & Renato Fontes Guimarães, 2021. "Relationship between Land Property Security and Brazilian Amazon Deforestation in the Mato Grosso State during the Period 2013–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    13. West, Thales A.P. & Fearnside, Philip M., 2021. "Brazil’s conservation reform and the reduction of deforestation in Amazonia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    14. Hissa, Leticia de Barros Viana & Aguiar, Ana Paula Dutra & Camargo, Rafael Rodrigues & Lima, Leticia Santos de & Gollnow, Florian & Lakes, Tobia, 2019. "Regrowing forests contribution to law compliance and carbon storage in private properties of the Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Olugbemi Mosunmola Aroke & Behzad Esmaeili & Sojung Claire Kim, 2021. "Impact of Climate Change on Transportation Infrastructure: Comparing Perception Differences between the US Public and the Department of Transportation (DOT) Professionals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Suhyun Jung & Cecilie Dyngeland & Lisa Rausch & Laura Vang Rasmussen, 2022. "Brazilian Land Registry Impacts on Land Use Conversion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 340-363, January.
    17. Sauer, Sérgio, 2018. "Soy expansion into the agricultural frontiers of the Brazilian Amazon: The agribusiness economy and its social and environmental conflicts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 326-338.
    18. Newton, Peter & Agrawal, Arun & Wollenberg, Lini, 2013. "Interventions for achieving sustainability in tropical forest and agricultural landscapes," CAPRi working papers 110, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. Joana Castro Pereira & João Terrenas, 2022. "Towards a transformative governance of the Amazon," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(S3), pages 60-75, December.
    20. José-Silva, Leandro & dos Santos, Reginaldo Carvalho & de Lima, Bruna Martins & Lima, Mendelson & de Oliveira-Júnior, José Francisco & Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo & Eisenlohr, Pedro V. & da Silva Junior, C, 2018. "Improving the validation of ecological niche models with remote sensing analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 380(C), pages 22-30.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:103:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721000053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.