IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v169y2026ics026483772600222x.html

Composite driving mechanisms of farmland abandonment in plains and mountainous areas of China from a 1-km grid perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Jiayi
  • Ye, Sijing
  • Weng, Longfeng
  • Wang, Guoli
  • Ren, Shuyi
  • Du, Bin
  • Gao, Peichao
  • Song, Changqing

Abstract

Reducing farmland abandonment is essential for protecting farmland resources and ensuring national food security. The driving mechanisms of farmland abandonment in China at the 1-km grid scale remain insufficiently understood. In this study, a composite theoretical framework integrating natural factors, socioeconomic factors, and cultivation conditions was developed to explain farmland abandonment at the grid scale. Fifteen driving variables, together with a 1-km gridded dataset of farmland abandonment ratio (the proportion of abandoned farmland relative to the total farmland area), were modelled using random forest models. The SHAPley additive explanations algorithm was applied to quantify both the individual effects and interaction effects. The results revealed that in 2019, the overall farmland abandonment ratio in China was 4.49%, with higher rates observed in mountainous areas (6.26%) than in the plains (2.22%). Stable hotspots of farmland abandonment emerged in the agro‑pastoral transition zone between the northern arid and semiarid regions and the Loess Plateau, in the southeastern coastal region, in the southwestern mountainous region, and around the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei urban agglomeration. Distinct driving mechanisms of farmland abandonment were observed between plains and mountainous areas. Increased farmland density mitigated abandonment risk across both terrains by strengthening large‑scale farming and organizational structure. In plains, farmland abandonment was governed mainly by labour, location, and organizational structure. Engineering improvements and institutional support weakened the effects of climatic and topographic factors. The influence of ageing was both stage-specific and bidirectional. In mountainous areas, farmland abandonment was driven mainly by strong coupling among climatic conditions, topography, and service accessibility. The effects of climatic conditions were amplified by their interactions with slope and altitude, resulting in the formation of a chain that extends from natural stress to mechanization constraints and ultimately to cost accumulation. The dominant driving factors of farmland abandonment varied regionally. Natural factors dominated in western high‑altitude, cold, and arid areas. Socioeconomic factors dominated in the plains and rapidly urbanizing regions. Cultivation conditions were dominant in hilly regions and areas characterized by fragmented farmland. This study enhances the understanding of farmland abandonment from a grid-scale perspective and provides guidance for regionalized governance strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Jiayi & Ye, Sijing & Weng, Longfeng & Wang, Guoli & Ren, Shuyi & Du, Bin & Gao, Peichao & Song, Changqing, 2026. "Composite driving mechanisms of farmland abandonment in plains and mountainous areas of China from a 1-km grid perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600222x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772600222X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600222x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.