IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v169y2026ics0264837726002000.html

Exploring land cover change patterns in Hyrcanian forests through spatiotemporal trend analysis (2000–2022)

Author

Listed:
  • Ashournejad, Qadir
  • Garshasbi, Fateme

Abstract

Forests play a crucial role in maintaining environmental balance by providing a wide range of valuable ecosystem services. Monitoring their change dynamics is increasingly important for planning, decision-making, and especially for evaluating conservation policies. Due to the significance of this issue, the number of studies examining global forests in terms of change trends is not uniform. The Hyrcanian forests, recognized as one of the most important temperate forests in the world and listed as a UNESCO World Heritage site since 2019, serve as a notable example. The study of their change trends, particularly in light of recent conservation policies, has gained increasing importance. This study aims to analyze the spatial-temporal change trends of the Hyrcanian forests from 2000 to 2022 using remote sensing products. To assess the intensity and direction of changes, Sen’s slope and Mann-Kendall tests were employed. The results indicate 78,609.51 ha of degradation and 85,579.15 ha of deforestation during the study period in this region. Meanwhile, the forest restoration effort has only covered 45,525.90 ha, emphasizing the imbalance between deforestation and restoration. Deforestation is primarily driven by the expansion of agricultural lands, accounting for 79.45% of the total changes. Impervious surfaces and shrublands follow with 7.66% and 5.67%, respectively. In contrast, forest restoration has mostly occurred through the conversion of agricultural land into forests, with agricultural land contributing 74.26% to this process. Grasslands and shrublands follow with 8.14% and 7.65%, respectively. The economic analysis also revealed that deforestation has led to a loss of $1.033 billion in ecosystem service value from the Hyrcanian forests. Among the major policies, the implementation of the forest rest plan in 2016 and the inclusion of the Hyrcanian forests in the UNESCO World Heritage List in 2019 have played a significant role in mitigating forest degradation. Prior to these policies, forest degradation in some years reached approximately 4000 ha, but following their implementation, it was reduced to around 1500 ha. Additionally projections for 2030, 2040, and 2046 show that, without continued protective policies, the forest area could decrease by up to 64,340 ha by 2046, while with the continuation of policies, the forest area could increase by up to 28,554 ha. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of conservation policies and emphasize the necessity for their continuation and strengthening, along with revising land management practices, planning for ecosystem restoration, and ensuring the sustainable use of natural resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashournejad, Qadir & Garshasbi, Fateme, 2026. "Exploring land cover change patterns in Hyrcanian forests through spatiotemporal trend analysis (2000–2022)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002000
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726002000
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salmerón-Manzano, Esther & Manzano-Agugliaro, Francisco, 2023. "Worldwide research trends on land tenure," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Liu, Yansui & Zhou, Yang, 2021. "Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Claudia Múnera-Roldán & Matthew J. Colloff & Jamie Pittock & Lorrae Kerkhoff, 2024. "Aligning adaptation and sustainability agendas: lessons from protected areas," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Jafari, Ali & Sadeghi Kaji, Hamdollah & Azadi, Hossein & Gebrehiwot, Kindeya & Aghamir, Fateme & Van Passel, Steven, 2018. "Assessing the sustainability of community forest management: A case study from Iran," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 1-8.
    5. Brander, L.M. & de Groot, R. & Schägner, J.P. & Guisado-Goñi, V. & van 't Hoff, V. & Solomonides, S. & McVittie, A. & Eppink, F. & Sposato, M. & Do, L. & Ghermandi, A. & Sinclair, M. & Thomas, R., 2024. "Economic values for ecosystem services: A global synthesis and way forward," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Rizwan Muhammad & Wenyin Zhang & Zaheer Abbas & Feng Guo & Luc Gwiazdzinski, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Change Analysis and Prediction of Future Land Use and Land Cover Changes Using QGIS MOLUSCE Plugin and Remote Sensing Big Data: A Case Study of Linyi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Jahanifar, Komeil & Amirnejad, Hamid & Mojaverian, Seyed Mojtaba & Azadi, Hossein, 2020. "Land use change drivers in the Hyrcanian Vegetation Area: Dynamic simultaneous equations system with panel data approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Zhang, Hua & Xu, Tiantian & Feng, Chao, 2022. "Does public participation promote environmental efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of environmental information disclosure in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Quoc Vo, Tuan & Kuenzer, C. & Oppelt, N., 2015. "How remote sensing supports mangrove ecosystem service valuation: A case study in Ca Mau province, Vietnam," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 67-75.
    10. Costanza, Robert & d'Arge, Ralph & de Groot, Rudolf & Farber, Stephen & Grasso, Monica & Hannon, Bruce & Limburg, Karin & Naeem, Shahid & O'Neill, Robert V. & Paruelo, Jose, 1998. "The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 3-15, April.
    11. Garcia, Gino & Mann, Carsten & Cremer, Tobias, 2025. "An integrated conflict analysis approach for the sustainable supply of Forest Ecosystem Services in Germany - the case of forest-based biofuel production," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    12. Youjin Jung & Joonsoon Kim, 2025. "Subnational REDD+ Implementation: A Synthesis of Opportunities and Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoo, Sunbin & Kumagai, Junya & Zhang, Bingqi & Zheng, Longfei, 2026. "High-speed rail, land-use transformation, and natural capital depletion: A comparative analysis of China and Japan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Chen, Haojie, 2025. "How to assess realized ecosystem services: Indicators, challenges in determining actual use, and suggestions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Rubbi, Fabio, 2025. "Ecosystem services demand in social-ecological systems: towards a typology of assessment approaches," FEEM Working Papers 386092, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    4. Montano, Laura & Harrison, Alice & Henderson, Brad & Coleman, Melinda A. & Raoult, Vincent & Taylor, Matthew D. & Gaston, Troy & Dwyer, Patrick G. & Costanza, Robert & Dansie, Andrew & Glamore, Willia, 2025. "The value of Australian aquatic ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Wood, Kevin A. & Jupe, Lucy L. & Aguiar, Francisca C. & Collins, Alexandra M. & Davidson, Scott J. & Freeman, Will & Kirkpatrick, Liam & Lobato-de Magalhães, Tatiana & McKinley, Emma & Nuno, Ana & Pag, 2024. "A global systematic review of the cultural ecosystem services provided by wetlands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Zhang, Xinrong & Wang, Yongsheng & Yuan, Xuefeng & Shao, Yajing & Bai, Yu, 2022. "Identifying ecosystem service supply-demand imbalance for sustainable land management in China’s Loess Plateau," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    7. Xinyan Wu & Jinmei Ding & Bingjie Lu & Yuanyuan Wan & Linna Shi & Qi Wen, 2022. "Eco-Environmental Effects of Changes in Territorial Spatial Pattern and Their Driving Forces in Qinghai, China (1980–2020)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Jinxia Wang & Yunfeng Tan & Qiong Hu & Huarong Cheng & Fang Gao, 2024. "Research on talent cultivation for rural revitalization based on three-party evolutionary game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Huicai Yang & Shuqin Zhao & Zhanfei Qin & Zhiguo Qi & Xinying Jiao & Zhen Li, 2024. "Differentiation of Carbon Sink Enhancement Potential in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Liu, Jiamin & Zhang, Jiaoning & Ma, Xiaoyu & Zhao, Bin & Zhang, Mengyu, 2024. "The road to sustainable development: Can the new energy demonstration city policy promote the industrial structure transformation?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    11. Wang, Lisha & Pan, Minjie & Qian, Xinlei & Lv, Kangjuan, 2025. "Do specialized courts matter? Environmental judiciary and corporate emissions in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    12. SrinivasaPerumal Padma & Sivakumar Vidhya Lakshmi & Ramaiah Prakash & Sundaresan Srividhya & Aburpa Avanachari Sivakumar & Nagarajan Divyah & Cristian Canales & Erick I. Saavedra Flores, 2022. "Simulation of Land Use/Land Cover Dynamics Using Google Earth Data and QGIS: A Case Study on Outer Ring Road, Southern India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Nunes, P.A.L.D. & Nijkamp, P., 2011. "Biodiversity: Economic perspectives," Serie Research Memoranda 0002, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    14. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    15. Hendrawan, Dienda C P & Musshoff, Oliver, 2022. "Oil Palm Smallholder Farmers' Livelihood Resilience and Decision Making in Replanting," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322441, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Jiajia Guo & Xin Shen, 2024. "Does Digitalization Facilitate Environmental Governance Performance? An Empirical Analysis Based on the PLS-SEM Model in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Man-Jing Li & Jia-Xu Han & Mao Zhu & Yuan-Biao Zhang, 2019. "The True Valuation of Land Use Project in China Considering Ecosystem Services," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(10), pages 1-46, October.
    18. Ping Shen & Lijuan Wu & Ziwen Huo & Jiaying Zhang, 2023. "A Study on the Spatial Pattern of the Ecological Product Value of China’s County-Level Regions Based on GEP Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Mary Nkosi & Fhumulani I. Mathivha, 2025. "The Application of CA–MLP–ANN in Assessing Urbanisation in Quaternary Catchment X22J of Mpumalanga, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, October.
    20. van der Hoff, Richard & Nascimento, Nathália & Fabrício-Neto, Ailton & Jaramillo-Giraldo, Carolina & Ambrosio, Geanderson & Arieira, Julia & Afonso Nobre, Carlos & Rajão, Raoni, 2022. "Policy-oriented ecosystem services research on tropical forests in South America: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:169:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726002000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.