Author
Listed:
- He, Qingsong
- Jiang, Yukun
- Wu, Dang
- Wu, Chao
Abstract
In the context of global urbanization, shrinking built-up areas (SBA) characterized by declining nighttime light intensity and reduced utilization efficiency, has emerged as a critical challenge to sustainable urban development. While existing research primarily focuses on identifying shrinkage phenomena, it methodologically lacks systematic reference to growth regions’ experiences. This study proposes an analytical framework combining machine learning and case-based reasoning to reverse-diagnose shrinking regions. Rather than imposing a growth-centric logic on shrinking cities, high-performing regions are utilized to establish a benchmark of the functional balance between infrastructure, economic density, and service provision. By learning these universal conditions of vitality, specific structural deficits in shrinking areas can be identified. Analyzing 572483 newly added built-up patches in China (2012–2019), we find 16.78% exhibited SBA patterns, displaying distinct spatial gradients from Northeast China (33.16%) to East China (11.86%). Three machine learning models achieved prediction accuracy exceeding 68%, with LightGBM reaching 72.64%, demonstrating robust predictive capability. Comparative analysis revealed substantial gaps between SBA and growth regions in infrastructure provision, economic density, and industrial structure balance. Through cluster analysis, five urban optimization types were identified requiring differentiated strategies. This framework provides quantitative foundations for evidence-based urban development optimization.
Suggested Citation
He, Qingsong & Jiang, Yukun & Wu, Dang & Wu, Chao, 2026.
"Learning from growth regions: Exploring optimal paths for shrinking built-up areas using machine learning and case-based reasoning,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:166:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000931
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108009
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:166:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.