IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v156y2025ics0264837725001395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divergent global land change scenarios from 2001 to 2019

Author

Listed:
  • Peng, Siqi
  • Zhang, Xiao
  • Liu, Liangyun

Abstract

Global land use and land cover (LULC) change plays a critical role in environmental change, biodiversity conservation, climate regulation, and ecosystem services. Over the past few decades, multiple global LULC datasets—such as MCD12Q1, ESA CCI-LC, GLC-FCS30D, HYDE 3.3, HILDA+ , and LUH2—have been developed using remote sensing or historical reconstruction. In this study, we comprehensively analyse the similarities and discrepancies among six global LULC datasets, revealing land-cover changes and transitions from 2001 to 2019. The most significant global LULC changes during this period include forest loss, cropland gain, and settlement expansion. The mutual conversion between forest and cropland was particularly prominent, accounting for around 20 % of all land-use transitions. However, notable discrepancies exist among the datasets in capturing global LULC changes. For example, estimates of net forest area change vary from an increase of 1.10×105km2 to a decrease of 1.55×106km2, while cropland area changes vary from a rise of 1.59×106km2 to a decline of 4.11×104km2. Settlement areas saw the most significant increase in the GLC-FCS30D dataset. These differences were most pronounced in Africa and South America for forest loss and cropland gain, and in Asia for settlement expansion. Comparisons with FAOSTAT show that GLC-FCS30D and HYDE 3.3 align closely with cropland changes, while HILDA+ closely matches forest change data. These findings highlight the importance of harmonizing LULC datasets to improve the accuracy of global land change assessments and support better environmental management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng, Siqi & Zhang, Xiao & Liu, Liangyun, 2025. "Divergent global land change scenarios from 2001 to 2019," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:156:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725001395
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725001395
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107605?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:156:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725001395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.