IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v136y2024ics026483772300443x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework for identifying the distribution of revitalization potential of idle rural residential land under rural revitalization

Author

Listed:
  • Tao, Zhou
  • Guanghui, Jiang
  • Wenqiu, Ma
  • Ruijuan, Zhang
  • Yingying, Tian
  • Qinglei, Zhao
  • Yaya, Tian

Abstract

Idle rural residential land (IRRL) serves as a crucial resource for rural land utilization. Evaluating its potential for revitalization forms the foundational research in rural land consolidation. In the context of rural revitalization, quantitatively determining the potential to revitalize IRRL is a fundamental scientific investigation, requiring focus within the field of rural land sustainability research. In our study, we have developed a framework for identifying IRRL revitalization potential under rural revitalization, combining with the village development environment and self-characteristics of IRRL, and have proposed a classification method of IRRL revitalization types. Our results found a spatial mismatch between the IRRL revitalization potential and the external conditions of consolidation potential release. Compared with the IRRL consolidation potential based on spatial characteristics, the vitality of rural revitalization in Pinggu is small, which is manifested as low vitality of rural revitalization and surplus revitalization potential. Under rural revitalization, the IRRL revitalization potential in Pinggu is low. In the central agricultural and eastern semi-mountainous regions, IRRL plays a pivotal role in land reutilization within the context of rural revitalization. Moderate revitalization is the dominant revitalization type. The revitalization of IRRL in the central agricultural and eastern semi-mountainous regions plays a pivotal role in the reuse of residential land within rural revitalization. The prominent revitalization type is characterized as moderate revitalization. Considering the diversity of rural revitalization in Pinggu, the revitalization of IRRL should prioritize meeting a range of land usage needs within the rural revitalization context. Furthermore, it should capitalize on surplus potential through strategies like spatial transfer or retaining idle IRRL. Our research aims to foster a fresh perspective on the potential for revitalizing IRRL within the rural revitalization framework, emphasizing rural regional systems. This, in turn, can facilitate the harmonization of IRRL utilization with rural development, offering theoretical underpinning for human-land coordination and sustainable rural development in developing nations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao, Zhou & Guanghui, Jiang & Wenqiu, Ma & Ruijuan, Zhang & Yingying, Tian & Qinglei, Zhao & Yaya, Tian, 2024. "A framework for identifying the distribution of revitalization potential of idle rural residential land under rural revitalization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s026483772300443x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772300443X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eirik Romstad, 2010. "Multifunctional Rural Land Management: Economics and Policies," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 202-204, February.
    2. Frank Ellis, 2000. "The Determinants of Rural Livelihood Diversification in Developing Countries," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 289-302, May.
    3. Guo, Yuanzhi & Liu, Yansui, 2021. "Poverty alleviation through land assetization and its implications for rural revitalization in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    4. Zhou, Yang & Li, Yamei & Xu, Chenchen, 2020. "Land consolidation and rural revitalization in China: Mechanisms and paths," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Ellis, Frank, 2000. "Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198296966, Decembrie.
    6. Gao, Chunliu & Cheng, Li, 2020. "Tourism-driven rural spatial restructuring in the metropolitan fringe: An empirical observation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-4.
    8. Qu, Yanbo & Jiang, Guang-hui & Li, Zitong & Tian, Yaya & Wei, Shuwen, 2019. "Understanding rural land use transition and regional consolidation implications in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 742-753.
    9. Huang, Yaofu & Hui, Eddie C.M. & Zhou, Jinmiao & Lang, Wei & Chen, Tingting & Li, Xun, 2020. "Rural Revitalization in China: Land-Use Optimization through the Practice of Place-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiaxiang Wang & Zehao Cao & Tian Chen & Chunguang Hu, 2025. "The Impact of Policy Quantification on Rural Spatial Development in Suburbs: A Case Study of Dalian’s Main Urban Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jose Manuel Diaz-Sarachaga, 2020. "Combining Participatory Processes and Sustainable Development Goals to Revitalize a Rural Area in Cantabria (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-28, October.
    2. Zhou, Yang & Zhong, Zhen & Cheng, Guoqiang, 2023. "Cultivated land loss and construction land expansion in China: Evidence from national land surveys in 1996, 2009 and 2019," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Longjunjiang Huang & Cong Liao & Xuan Guo & Yanlin Liu & Xiaojin Liu, 2023. "Analysis of the Impact of Livelihood Capital on Livelihood Strategies of Leased-In Farmland Households: A Case Study of Jiangxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    4. Wang, Wenxiong & Lan, Yuanqin & Wang, Xu, 2021. "Impact of livelihood capital endowment on poverty alleviation of households under rural land consolidation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Li, Jing & Lo, Kevin & Zhang, Pingyu & Guo, Meng, 2021. "Reclaiming small to fill large: A novel approach to rural residential land consolidation in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Hongzhang Xu & Jamie Pittock & Katherine A. Daniell, 2021. "China: A New Trajectory Prioritizing Rural Rather Than Urban Development?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-29, May.
    7. Guo, Beibei & Fang, Yelin & Jin, Xiaobin & zhou, Yinkang, 2020. "Monitoring the effects of land consolidation on the ecological environmental quality based on remote sensing: A case study of Chaohu Lake Basin, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. Lin, Yongyuan & Shui, Wei & Li, Zhipan & Huang, Shan & Wu, Kexin & Sun, Xiaorui & Liang, Jingchen, 2021. "Green space optimization for rural vitality: Insights for planning and policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Liu, Shuchang & Xiao, Wu & Ye, Yanmei & He, Tingting & Luo, Heng, 2023. "Rural residential land expansion and its impacts on cultivated land in China between 1990 and 2020," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Mingjun Cai & Bin Ouyang & Matthew Quayson, 2024. "Navigating the Nexus between Rural Revitalization and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analyses of Current Status, Progress, and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, January.
    11. Leng Liu & Congjie Cao & Wei Song, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis in the Field of Rural Revitalization: Current Status, Progress, and Prospects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Yinan Xu & Yingxing Zhao & Peng Sui & Wangsheng Gao & Zhijun Li & Yuanquan Chen, 2021. "Emergy-Based Evaluation on the Systemic Sustainability of Rural Ecosystem under China Poverty Alleviation and Rural Revitalization: A Case of the Village in North China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Yujun Zhou & Jingming Liu & Xiang Kang, 2022. "Market-Driven Rural Construction—A Case Study of Fuhong Town, Chengdu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Zhang, Chuanyong & Song, Yanjiao, 2022. "Road to the city: Impact of land expropriation on farmers’ urban settlement intention in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    15. Li, Hanbing & Jin, Xiaobin & McCormick, Barbara Prack & Tittonell, Pablo & Liu, Jing & Han, Bo & Sun, Rui & Zhou, Yinkang, 2023. "Analysis of the contribution of land consolidation to sustainable poverty alleviation under various natural conditions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    16. Zhou, Yang & Li, Xunhuan & Liu, Yansui, 2021. "Cultivated land protection and rational use in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    17. Rao, Nitya, 2017. "Assets, Agency and Legitimacy: Towards a Relational Understanding of Gender Equality Policy and Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 43-54.
    18. Ada P. Smith & Sechindra Vallury & Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf, 2023. "Social dimensions of adaptation to climate change in rangelands: a systematic literature review," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(12), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Jan Fałkowski & Maciej Jakubowski & Paweł Strawiński, 2014. "Returns from income strategies in rural Poland," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 22(1), pages 139-178, January.
    20. Food Security and Agricultural Projects Analysis Service (ESAF), 2004. "Food insecurity and vulnerability in Viet Nam: Profiles of four vulnerable groups," ESA Working Papers 23798, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s026483772300443x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.