IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p1079-d1656877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Driving Mechanisms and Regulation Pathways of Rural Construction Land Changes Based on the Decoupling-Potential Linkage Model: A Case Study of a County in Northern China

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Zhao

    (College of Architecture and Art, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
    Shandong Urban and Rural Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China)

  • Weicheng Han

    (College of Architecture and Art, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Zhiqi Zhang

    (College of Architecture and Art, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

Abstract

Amidst the backdrop of rural population decline and the inefficient expansion of construction land, traditional land management models are confronted with the dual challenges of supply–demand mismatch and low efficiency. This paper constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework based on decoupling types, development potential, and driving mechanisms. Initially, using Tapio’s decoupling theory, the study identifies the population–land decoupling types among 224 villages in Yanggao County, Shanxi Province, Northern China. It then evaluates the development potential of rural construction land using a comprehensive index system, and a linkage analysis between the two is conducted. Finally, the study employs the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) method to conduct an in-depth analysis of the mechanisms driving changes in rural construction land. The results indicate the following: (1) Between 2010 and 2020, the study area exhibited a reverse evolution characterized by rural population loss and the expansion of construction land, with a significant “population–land decoupling” phenomenon. (2) The development potential for rural construction land shows a pattern of being high in the north and south, low in the middle, high in mountainous and hilly areas, low in plains, and high in peripheral areas but low in town centers. (3) Villages in Yanggao County are predominantly of the resource reserve type (49.11%), indicating relatively abundant land resource reserves. (4) In different population migration patterns, the reduction in land-use efficiency represents similar proportions (38% and 36%), with villages experiencing net population inflow performing better in improving land-use efficiency compared to those with net population outflow. Drawing on international governance experiences, the study proposes classification and phased implementation pathways. By revealing the dynamic patterns of rural population–land relationships—construction land potential and change mechanisms—the logic of regulatory path adaptation, the article provides a methodological paradigm for constructing a precise and differentiated land resource allocation system, promoting the transition of rural spatial governance from expansion in scale to an improvement in quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Zhao & Weicheng Han & Zhiqi Zhang, 2025. "Study on the Driving Mechanisms and Regulation Pathways of Rural Construction Land Changes Based on the Decoupling-Potential Linkage Model: A Case Study of a County in Northern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1079-:d:1656877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1079/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1079/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xuechao Xia & Hui Sun & Zedong Yang & Weipeng Yuan & Dianyuan Ma, 2022. "Decoupling Analysis of Rural Population Change and Rural Electricity Consumption Change in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Mu Li & Yunyang Shi & Wenkai Duan & Aiqi Chen & Nan Wang & Jinmin Hao, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Decoupling of Population, Economy and Construction Land Changes in Hebei Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Yafeng Zou & Chengfeng Yi & Yufei Rao & Feng Luo & Changhe Lv & Pinqi Wu, 2023. "Identify Optimization Type of Rural Settlements Based on “Production–Living–Ecological” Functions and Vitality: A Case Study of a Town in Northern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Xing Niu & Fenghua Liao & Ziming Liu & Guancen Wu, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Land–Use Transition from the Perspective of Urban–Rural Transformation Development: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Lorenzo Cotula & Ward Anseeuw & Giulia Maria Baldinelli, 2019. "Between Promising Advances and Deepening Concerns: A Bottom-Up Review of Trends in Land Governance 2015–2018," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Yu Peng & Xiaobing Peng & Xu Li & Mingyue Lu & Mingze Yin, 2023. "Effectiveness in Rural Governance: Influencing Factors and Driving Pathways—Based on 20 Typical Cases of Rural Governance in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Ma, Yiguan & Chiu, Rebecca L.H., 2018. "Governing rural redevelopment and re-distributing land rights: The case of Tianjin," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 533-546.
    8. Xueru Zhang & Jie Wang & Wei Song & Fengfei Wang & Xing Gao & Lei Liu & Kun Dong & Dazhi Yang, 2022. "Decoupling Analysis between Rural Population Change and Rural Construction Land Changes in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Zhou, Hong & Yan, Jianzhong & Lei, Kun & Wu, Ya & Sun, Laixiang, 2020. "Labor migration and the decoupling of the crop-livestock system in a rural mountainous area: Evidence from Chongqing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Suxia Zhao & Mengmeng Yin, 2023. "Research on Rural Population/Arable Land/Rural Settlements Association Model and Coordinated Development Path: A Case Analysis of the Yellow River Basin (Henan Section)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Yin, Qiqi & Sui, Xueyan & Ye, Bei & Zhou, Yujie & Li, Chengqiang & Zou, Mengmeng & Zhou, Shenglu, 2022. "What role does land consolidation play in the multi-dimensional rural revitalization in China? A research synthesis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    12. Shi, Linna & Wang, Yongsheng, 2021. "Evolution characteristics and driving factors of negative decoupled rural residential land and resident population in the Yellow River Basin," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Tao, Zhou & Guanghui, Jiang & Wenqiu, Ma & Ruijuan, Zhang & Yingying, Tian & Qinglei, Zhao & Yaya, Tian, 2024. "A framework for identifying the distribution of revitalization potential of idle rural residential land under rural revitalization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    14. Xiaojuan Yang & Weiwei Li & Ping Zhang & Hua Chen & Min Lai & Sidong Zhao, 2023. "The Dynamics and Driving Mechanisms of Rural Revitalization in Western China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jichang Cui & Yanbo Qu & Yan Li & Lingyun Zhan & Guancheng Guo & Xiaozhen Dong, 2022. "Reconstruction of Rural Settlement Patterns in China: The Role of Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Wu, Xiaoran & Zhao, Na & Wang, Yuwei & Zhang, Liqiang & Wang, Wei & Liu, Yansui, 2024. "Cropland non-agriculturalization caused by the expansion of built-up areas in China during 1990–2020," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Zhao, Xiang & Cai, Bocheng & He, Jianhua & Kong, Xuesong, 2024. "Identifying potential rural residential areas for land consolidation using a data driven agent-based model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Jiwei Li & Qingqing Ye & Weiqiang Chen & Xuesong Kong & Qingsheng Bi & Jie Lu & Enxiang Cai & Hejie Wei & Xinwei Feng & Yulong Guo, 2022. "An Analysis Method of Quantitative Coupling Rationality between Urban–Rural Construction Land and Population: A Case Study of Henan Province in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Yuzhu Zang & Junjun Zhu & Xu Han & Ligang Lv, 2023. "Dynamics between Population Growth and Construction Land Expansion: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Xiao Zhu & Di Yao & Hanyue Shi & Kaichen Qu & Yuxiao Tang & Kaixu Zhao, 2022. "The Evolution Mode and Driving Mechanisms of the Relationship between Construction Land Use and Permanent Population in Urban and Rural Contexts: Evidence from China’s Land Survey," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-44, October.
    7. Jieying Yang & Li Yu & Jingxiang Zhang, 2024. "Impacts on Rural Community Development and Governance by Different Land Ownership: A Comparative Study Based on Two Villages in China," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(6), pages 1616-1635, December.
    8. Xiaoyu Liu & Liangjie Xin, 2022. "Assessment of the Efficiency of Cultivated Land Occupied by Urban and Rural Construction Land in China from 1990 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-12, June.
    9. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Xiuling Ding & Qian Lu & Lipeng Li & Apurbo Sarkar & Hua Li, 2023. "Does Labor Transfer Improve Farmers’ Willingness to Withdraw from Farming?—A Bivariate Probit Modeling Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    11. Francisco Javier Castellano-Álvarez & Rafael Robina-Ramírez & Francisco Silva, 2024. "Rural Areas Facing the Challenge of Economic Diversification: Threats and Opportunities," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-5, April.
    12. Jiamin Ren & Chenrouyu Zheng & Fuyou Guo & Hongbo Zhao & Shuang Ma & Yu Cheng, 2022. "Spatial Differentiation of Digital Rural Development and Influencing Factors in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Heying Li & Jianchen Zhang & Yamin Shan & Guangxia Wang & Qin Tian & Jiayao Wang & Huiling Ma, 2024. "Study on Spatial Distribution Dispersion Evaluation and Driving Forces of Rural Settlements in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Xiaqun Liu & Xiaoyue Qiu & Yaming Zhuang, 2025. "Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Rural Revitalization in China: A Perspective on Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Jiatong Han & Minghong Tan, 2025. "Dramatic Decoupling Between Population and Construction Land in Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Jianfang Liu & Qian Zhang & Qianyi Wang & Yaoping Lv & Yingqi Tang, 2023. "Gross Ecosystem Product Accounting of a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System: The Longxian Rice–Fish Symbiotic System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Hong, Huikun & Cai, Zhicong & Liao, Heping & Liu, Ting, 2024. "Rural housing-jobs synergy at the county level in mountainous and hilly areas of China: Spatio-temporal pattern and driving mechanism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    18. Yang Liu & Jiajun Qiao & Jie Xiao & Dong Han & Tao Pan, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Rural Revitalization and an Improvement Path: A Typical Old Revolutionary Cultural Area as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Chuanming Sun & Guoxin Tan & Xingyu Chai & Haiqing Zhang, 2023. "Analysis on the Satisfaction of Public Cultural Service by Township Residents: A Qualitative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Yichi Zhang & Kai Xue & Huimin Cao & Yingen Hu, 2023. "The Non-Linear Relationship between the Number of Permanent Residents and the Willingness of Rural Residential Land Transfer: The Threshold Effect of per Capita Net Income," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1079-:d:1656877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.