IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v109y2021ics0264837721004312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A method for the determination of urban transformation areas in Kocaeli

Author

Listed:
  • Salihoğlu, Tayfun
  • Albayrak, Ayşe Nur
  • Eryılmaz, Yaşasın

Abstract

With changes in urbanization dynamics in the world, transformation issues and approaches have also changed. New approaches are needed to determine intervention areas and priorities, especially in situations that affect the whole city, such as disaster risks. In this study, the subject of the case of Kocaeli (Turkey) has been examined, and a methodology for evaluating urban space in terms of urban transformation has been developed. The study is rooted in the following research questions: Is it possible to determine urban transformation zones by scoring urban areas? How could urban space be classified by using components that represent different problems in urban space in terms of urban transformation? For this purpose, a geographic database with weighted scores was created by using three main components: Problems in the Built Environment, Disaster Risks, and Lack of Urban Services. Local Moran’s I was calculated to test the type of distribution and its significance on cells. Grouping Analysis was run by using each component's scores in significantly clustered cells as inputs. As a result, six regions were revealed in the entire urban area of Kocaeli. The results signal a well-established method for discovering and representing both the unique and identical nature of urban space regarding urban transformation. The method enables decision makers to develop area-specific policies and strategies in the process of preparing urban transformation master plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Salihoğlu, Tayfun & Albayrak, Ayşe Nur & Eryılmaz, Yaşasın, 2021. "A method for the determination of urban transformation areas in Kocaeli," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721004312
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721004312
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Manson & Li An & Keith C. Clarke & Alison Heppenstall & Jennifer Koch & Brittany Krzyzanowski & Fraser Morgan & David O'Sullivan & Bryan C Runck & Eric Shook & Leigh Tesfatsion, 2020. "Methodological Issues of Spatial Agent-Based Models," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 23(1), pages 1-3.
    2. Yi Peng, 2015. "Regional earthquake vulnerability assessment using a combination of MCDM methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 234(1), pages 95-110, November.
    3. John Lovering & Hade Türkmen, 2011. "Bulldozer Neo-liberalism in Istanbul: The State-led Construction of Property Markets, and the Displacement of the Urban Poor," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 73-96, February.
    4. Omidipoor, Morteza & Jelokhani-Niaraki, Mohammadreza & Moeinmehr, Athena & Sadeghi-Niaraki, Abolghasem & Choi, Soo-Mi, 2019. "A GIS-based decision support system for facilitating participatory urban renewal process," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Zheng, Wei & Shen, Geoffrey Qiping & Wang, Hao & Hong, Jingke & Li, Zhengdao, 2017. "Decision support for sustainable urban renewal: A multi-scale model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 361-371.
    6. Ustaoglu, E. & Aydınoglu, A.C., 2020. "Suitability evaluation of urban construction land in Pendik district of Istanbul, Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Xiaojun Mao & Somak Dutta & Raymond K. W. Wong & Dan Nettleton, 2020. "Adjusting for Spatial Effects in Genomic Prediction," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 699-718, December.
    8. Bin Zhou & Stephan Thies & Ramana Gudipudi & Matthias K B Lüdeke & Jürgen P Kropp & Diego Rybski, 2020. "A Gini approach to spatial CO2 emissions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Handan Turkoglu & Seda Kundak, 2011. "Urban Transformation as a tool for Disaster Mitigation," ERSA conference papers ersa11p390, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Gwen Van Eijk, 2010. "Exclusionary Policies are Not Just about the ‘Neoliberal City’: A Critique of Theories of Urban Revanchism and the Case of Rotterdam," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 820-834, December.
    11. Lai, Yani & Tang, Bosin & Chen, Xiangsheng & Zheng, Xian, 2021. "Spatial determinants of land redevelopment in the urban renewal processes in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    12. Helmut Stix, 2020. "A spatial analysis of access to ATMs in Austria," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q3/20, pages 39-59.
    13. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Henk Folmer, 2020. "Spatial economic aspects of climate change," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 209-218, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferretti, V., 2021. "Framing territorial regeneration decisions: Purpose, perspective and scope," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Liu, Xiping & Zhang, Xiaoling & Sun, Wen, 2022. "Does the agglomeration of urban producer services promote carbon efficiency of manufacturing industry?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "An Innovative Job Evaluation Approach Using the VIKOR Algorithm," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Khondaker Golam Moazzem & Tamim Ahmed, 2021. "Implications of COVID-19 for Bangladesh’s Graduation from the LDC Status," CPD Working Paper 140, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).
    5. Cao, Kexin & Deng, Yu & Wang, Wenxue & Liu, Shenghe, 2023. "The spatial heterogeneity and dynamics of land redevelopment: Evidence from 287 Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Giammatteo, Michele & Iezzi, Stefano & Zizza, Roberta, 2022. "Pecunia olet. Cash usage and the underground economy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 107-127.
    7. Albert Fu, 2016. "Neoliberalism, logistics and the treadmill of production in metropolitan waste management: A case of Turkish firms," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(10), pages 2099-2117, August.
    8. Gamze Erdem Türkelli, 2021. "Transnational Multistakeholder Partnerships as Vessels to Finance Development: Navigating the Accountability Waters," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(2), pages 177-189, April.
    9. Yu Chen & Shuangshuang Liu & Wenbo Ma & Qian Zhou, 2023. "Assessment of the Carrying Capacity and Suitability of Spatial Resources and the Environment and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki & Mohammadreza Jelokhani-Niaraki & Soo-Mi Choi, 2020. "A Volunteered Geographic Information-Based Environmental Decision Support System for Waste Management and Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Hans Pruijt, 2013. "Culture Wars, Revanchism, Moral Panics and the Creative City. A Reconstruction of a Decline of Tolerant Public Policy: The Case of Dutch Anti-squatting Legislation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(6), pages 1114-1129, May.
    12. Agnieszka Bieda & Agnieszka Telega, 2021. "The Analysis of Research Hotspots in the Field of Urban Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-6, August.
    13. Peter Nijkamp & Karima Kourtit & Henk Scholten & Esmeralda Willemsen, 2023. "Citizen Participation and Knowledge Support in Urban Public Energy Transition—A Quadruple Helix Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Mahir Yazar & Dina Hestad & Diana Mangalagiu & Ali Kerem Saysel & Yuge Ma & Thomas F. Thornton, 2020. "From urban sustainability transformations to green gentrification: urban renewal in Gaziosmanpaşa, Istanbul," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 637-653, June.
    15. Xufeng Cui & Tingting Zhou & Xinxing Xiong & Jiaqi Xiong & Jing Zhang & Yuehua Jiang, 2022. "Farmland Suitability Evaluation Oriented by Non-Agriculturalization Sensitivity: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Hans-Peter Piepho & Robert J. Tempelman & Emlyn R. Williams, 2020. "Guest Editors’ Introduction to the Special Issue on “Recent Advances in Design and Analysis of Experiments and Observational Studies in Agriculture”," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 453-456, December.
    17. Hanxue Wei & Lucien C. Wostenholme & John I. Carruthers, 2021. "Planning and Markets at Work: Seattle under Growth Management and Economic Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Guiwen Liu & Cheng Li & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuhan Zheng & Hongjuan Wu & Jian Tang, 2022. "Determining the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Urban Regeneration Projects in China on the City Scale: The Case of Shenzhen," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, July.
    19. An, Li & Grimm, Volker & Sullivan, Abigail & Turner II, B.L. & Malleson, Nicolas & Heppenstall, Alison & Vincenot, Christian & Robinson, Derek & Ye, Xinyue & Liu, Jianguo & Lindkvist, Emilie & Tang, W, 2021. "Challenges, tasks, and opportunities in modeling agent-based complex systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).
    20. Elkadeem, M.R. & Younes, Ali & Sharshir, Swellam W. & Campana, Pietro Elia & Wang, Shaorong, 2021. "Sustainable siting and design optimization of hybrid renewable energy system: A geospatial multi-criteria analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:109:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721004312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.