IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v93y2025ics0957178725000049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing a local flexibility market for buying back capacity from electricity consumers connected to the distribution network

Author

Listed:
  • Ziras, Charalampos
  • Zepter, Jan Martin
  • Pechrak, Shahatphong
  • Tsaousoglou, Georgios

Abstract

The proliferation of flexible resources in the electric distribution network and their active management have already started to cause congestion problems, mainly in areas with significant electric vehicle penetration. In this work, we study the reduction of usable capacity as a congestion management measure in a local flexibility market context. Using an extensive two-year residential charging dataset from Denmark, we highlight the problems caused by the almost 50% non-utilized capacity on an aggregated level of household chargers. We discuss and address various market design challenges and the implications of free excess capacity by treating aggregated capacity as a divisible good that can be traded between a distribution system operator (DSO) and flexibility service providers. The use of capacity blocks streamlines service delivery and overcomes many of the challenges of using explicit services. Finally, we show empirically that a simple, uniform pricing, two-stage auction significantly reduces DSO payments and mitigates the issue of excessive profit margins compared to a single-stage auction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziras, Charalampos & Zepter, Jan Martin & Pechrak, Shahatphong & Tsaousoglou, Georgios, 2025. "Designing a local flexibility market for buying back capacity from electricity consumers connected to the distribution network," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:93:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725000049
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2025.101889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000049
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2025.101889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:93:y:2025:i:c:s0957178725000049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.