IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v84y2023ics0957178723001479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the integration of planning instruments for urban land use and water service

Author

Listed:
  • Gonzalez-Mathiesen, Constanza
  • Palma, Cristian
  • Jara, Cesar
  • Zapata, Richard

Abstract

Land-use planning instruments guide development, significantly affecting future water demands. Hence, land-use and water-service planning should be integrated. However, water availability issues in urban areas might indicate that this integration is not happening. To evaluate the integration among planning instruments, we propose a set of indicators to quantify the magnitude of the integration and an appraisal framework for exploring the possible causes of a lack of integration. We apply them to eight settlements in Chile, and we find some inconsistencies between water service and land-use planning instruments. Suggestions are proposed to enable the desired integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Gonzalez-Mathiesen, Constanza & Palma, Cristian & Jara, Cesar & Zapata, Richard, 2023. "Assessing the integration of planning instruments for urban land use and water service," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:84:y:2023:i:c:s0957178723001479
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2023.101635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178723001479
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Furlong, Casey & Gan, Kein & De Silva, Saman, 2016. "Governance of Integrated Urban Water Management in Melbourne, Australia," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(PA), pages 48-58.
    2. Long, Kaisheng & Pijanowski, Bryan C., 2017. "Is there a relationship between water scarcity and water use efficiency in China? A national decadal assessment across spatial scales," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 502-511.
    3. Anna C. Hurlimann & Alan P. March, 2012. "The role of spatial planning in adapting to climate change," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(5), pages 477-488, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingjing Guo & Ziyu Jiang & Yan Bu & Jinhua Cheng, 2019. "Supporting Sustainable Development of Water Resources: A Social Welfare Maximization Game Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Chong Meng & Siyang Zhou & Wei Li, 2021. "An Optimization Model for Water Management under the Dual Constraints of Water Pollution and Water Scarcity in the Fenhe River Basin, North China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Sheng, Jichuan & Qiu, Wenge, 2022. "Water-use technical efficiency and income: Evidence from China's South-North Water Transfer Project," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    4. Furlong, Casey & Brotchie, Ryan & Considine, Robert & Finlayson, Greg & Guthrie, Lachlan, 2017. "Key concepts for Integrated Urban Water Management infrastructure planning: Lessons from Melbourne," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 84-96.
    5. Pogliani, Laura & Ronchi, Silvia & Arcidiacono, Andrea & di Martino, Viviana & Mazza, Francesca, 2023. "Regeneration in an ecological perspective. Urban and territorial equalisation for the provision of ecosystem services in the Metropolitan City of Milan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    6. Mikael Granberg & Lars Nyberg & Lars-Erik Modh, 2016. "Understanding the local policy context of risk management: Competitiveness and adaptation to climate risks in the city of Karlstad, Sweden," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 26-46, February.
    7. Aijun Guo & Daiwei Jiang & Fanglei Zhong & Xiaojiang Ding & Xiaoyu Song & Qingping Cheng & Yongnian Zhang & Chunlin Huang, 2019. "Prediction of Technological Change under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and Regional Differences: A Case Study of Irrigation Water Use Efficiency Changes in Chinese Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Malcolm Abbott & Bruce Cohen, 2017. "Drawing a Line in the Sand: Valuing Regulated Assets of the Australian Water Industry," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 36(1), pages 32-48, March.
    9. Chen Qu & Wen Li & Jia Xu & Song Shi, 2023. "Blackland Conservation and Utilization, Carbon Storage and Ecological Risk in Green Space: A Case Study from Heilongjiang Province in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Kebin Zhou & Shifu Wang & Yucheng Feng, 2023. "How Is Spatial Planning Adapting to Climate Change? A Textual Analysis Based on the Territorial and Spatial Plans of 368 Chinese Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-34, October.
    11. Yali Zhao & Min Li, 2020. "Effect of Water-Saving Society Policy on Water Consumption in the Cities of China: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Shih, Wan-Yu & Mabon, Leslie & Puppim de Oliveira, Jose A., 2020. "Assessing governance challenges of local biodiversity and ecosystem services: Barriers identified by the expert community," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Min Li & Kaisheng Long, 2019. "Direct or Spillover Effect: The Impact of Pure Technical and Scale Efficiencies of Water Use on Water Scarcity in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    14. Nan Lu & Jiwei Zhu & Hui Chi & Bing Wang & Lu Chen, 2021. "Progress Assessment and Spatial Heterogeneity Analysis of Water Conservancy Modernization Construction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Yiru Guo & Yan Hu & Ke Shi & Yuriy Bilan, 2020. "Valuation of Water Resource Green Efficiency Based on SBM–TOBIT Panel Model: Case Study from Henan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Stańczuk-Gałwiaczek, Małgorzata & Sobolewska-Mikulska, Katarzyna & Ritzema, Henk & van Loon-Steensma, Jantsje M., 2018. "Integration of water management and land consolidation in rural areas to adapt to climate change: Experiences from Poland and the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 498-511.
    17. Jincai Zhao & Yiyao Wang & Xiufeng Zhang & Qianxi Liu, 2022. "Industrial and Agricultural Water Use Efficiency and Influencing Factors in the Process of Urbanization in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yellow River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Bingquan Liu & Yongqing Li & Rui Hou & Hui Wang, 2019. "Does Urbanization Improve Industrial Water Consumption Efficiency?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Sara Soares & Daniela Terêncio & Luís Fernandes & João Machado & Fernando A.L. Pacheco, 2019. "The Potential of Small Dams for Conjunctive Water Management in Rural Municipalities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, April.
    20. Furlong, Casey & Jegatheesan, Jega & Currell, Matthew & Iyer-Raniga, Usha & Khan, Tehmina & Ball, Andrew S., 2019. "Is the global public willing to drink recycled water? A review for researchers and practitioners," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 53-61.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:84:y:2023:i:c:s0957178723001479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.