IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v56y2018icp87-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Large scale miners - Communities partnerships: A plausible option for communities survival beyond mine closure

Author

Listed:
  • Zvarivadza, T.

Abstract

A sound relationship between Large Scale Mining/Miners (LSMs) and communities is key to a successful and mutually beneficial mining venture. This relationship has to be carefully managed to ensure a conducive operating environment. Merely sticking to the dictates of a government issued mining licence by LSMs and not facing reality on the ground may spark stiff resistance from the communities on which the mining company has to operate. Two competing priorities have to be balanced - the LSM, having a mining licence, argue that they have a legal right from the government to mine while the community, which have stayed on the mining area for generations, claim the area as their birth right and believe they inherently have the mining right. A well-coordinated consultative approach and cooperation with communities is vitally important in breaking this impasse.

Suggested Citation

  • Zvarivadza, T., 2018. "Large scale miners - Communities partnerships: A plausible option for communities survival beyond mine closure," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 87-94.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:56:y:2018:i:c:p:87-94
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.12.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420717303719
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.12.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oecd, 2013. "Knowledge Networks and Markets," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 7, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bainton, Nicholas & Holcombe, Sarah, 2018. "A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 468-478.
    2. Rhee, Sophia & Nyanza, Elias Charles & Condon, Madison & Fisher, Joshua & Maduka, Theresia & Benshaul-Tolonen, Anja, 2018. "Understanding environmental, health and economic activity interactions following transition of ownership in gold mining areas in Tanzania: A case of private to public," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 650-658.
    3. Upadhyay, Saurabh, 2023. "Impact of the formal and informal institutions on the performance of Indian mining companies: A fuzzy set QCA analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cassetta, Ernesto & Marra, Alessandro & Pozzi, Cesare & Antonelli, Paola, 2017. "Emerging technological trajectories and new mobility solutions. A large-scale investigation on transport-related innovative start-ups and implications for policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-11.
    2. Joanne Larty & Sarah Jack & Nigel Lockett, 2017. "Building regions: a resource-based view of a policy-led knowledge exchange network," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(7), pages 994-1007, July.
    3. Brimkov, Boris & Fast, Caleb C. & Hicks, Illya V., 2019. "Computational approaches for zero forcing and related problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 889-903.
    4. Zvarivadza, T. & Nhleko, A.S., 2018. "Resolving artisanal and small-scale mining challenges: Moving from conflict to cooperation for sustainability in mine planning," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 78-86.
    5. Doyle, Jason P. & Pentecost, Robin D. & Funk, Daniel C., 2014. "The effect of familiarity on associated sponsor and event brand attitudes following negative celebrity endorser publicity," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 310-323.
    6. Carol A. Krech & Frauke Rüther & Oliver Gassmann, 2015. "Profiting From Invention: Business Models Of Patent Aggregating Companies," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-26.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:56:y:2018:i:c:p:87-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.