IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v78y2018icp139-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring K-best solutions to enrich network design decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Guazzelli, Cauê Sauter
  • Cunha, Claudio B.

Abstract

In this paper, we explore alternative solutions to the Capacitated Fixed Charge Facility Location problem (CFCFL) that usually arises in Supply Chain Network Design problems. More specifically, we aim to investigate in which cases these solutions can be considered as good as the optimal one from the point of view of decision-making in real-world problems. A method, as well as four enhancement variations, based on a mixed-integer programming (MIP) model is proposed, which allows K-best alternative solutions to be obtained. The method and its variations were applied to two benchmark instance sets available in the literature and the computational times were evaluated. The results have shown that the gap between the optimal solutions and the 20-best alternative ones were, on average, less than 1%; more surprisingly, 63.8% of all these alternative solutions had a gap smaller than 0.5%. This suggests that our approach may be used to identify whether near-optimal alternative solutions can yield to a better overall solution from the point of view of the decision-maker, by allowing other qualitative attributes to be considered. We were also able to rate the robustness of some selected facilities since many candidates have appeared in all 20 best solutions. In addition, the results may also suggest a way to measure the difficulty of benchmark instances for combinatorial problems and thus enhance the comparison of different heuristics proposed to solve them; not to mention that the uncertainty in input data of such strategic problems may reduce the relevance of the effort to find the best solution in the contexts in which several high-quality solutions arise.

Suggested Citation

  • Guazzelli, Cauê Sauter & Cunha, Claudio B., 2018. "Exploring K-best solutions to enrich network design decision-making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 139-164.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:78:y:2018:i:c:p:139-164
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2017.06.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048316308556
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2017.06.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harris, Irina & Mumford, Christine L. & Naim, Mohamed M., 2014. "A hybrid multi-objective approach to capacitated facility location with flexible store allocation for green logistics modeling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-22.
    2. Mariel, Katharina & Minner, Stefan, 2017. "Benders decomposition for a strategic network design problem under NAFTA local content requirements," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 62-75.
    3. James F. Campbell & Morton E. O'Kelly, 2012. "Twenty-Five Years of Hub Location Research," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 153-169, May.
    4. Jin Y. Yen, 1971. "Finding the K Shortest Loopless Paths in a Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(11), pages 712-716, July.
    5. Eugene L. Lawler, 1972. "A Procedure for Computing the K Best Solutions to Discrete Optimization Problems and Its Application to the Shortest Path Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(7), pages 401-405, March.
    6. Berman, Oded & Sanajian, Nima & Wang, Jiamin, 2017. "Location choice and risk attitude of a decision maker," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PA), pages 170-181.
    7. Melo, M.T. & Nickel, S. & Saldanha-da-Gama, F., 2009. "Facility location and supply chain management - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 401-412, July.
    8. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.
    9. Beasley, J. E., 1988. "An algorithm for solving large capacitated warehouse location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 314-325, February.
    10. Pascoal, Marta M.B. & Sedeño-Noda, Antonio, 2012. "Enumerating K best paths in length order in DAGs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 308-316.
    11. Cardoso, Sónia R. & Paula Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana & Relvas, Susana & Novais, Augusto Q., 2015. "Resilience metrics in the assessment of complex supply-chains performance operating under demand uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 53-73.
    12. Yang, Zhen & Chu, Feng & Chen, Haoxun, 2012. "A cut-and-solve based algorithm for the single-source capacitated facility location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(3), pages 521-532.
    13. Brucker, Peter J. & Hamacher, Horst W., 1989. "k-optimal solution sets for some polynomially solvable scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 194-202, July.
    14. Klibi, Walid & Martel, Alain & Guitouni, Adel, 2010. "The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: A critical review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 283-293, June.
    15. Yazar, Başak & Arslan, Okan & Karaşan, Oya Ekin & Kara, Bahar Y., 2016. "Fiber optical network design problems: A case for Turkey," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 23-40.
    16. Huang, Edward & Goetschalckx, Marc, 2014. "Strategic robust supply chain design based on the Pareto-optimal tradeoff between efficiency and risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 508-518.
    17. Leão, Aline A.S. & Santos, Maristela O. & Hoto, Robinson & Arenales, Marcos N., 2011. "The constrained compartmentalized knapsack problem: mathematical models and solution methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 455-463, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jahani, Hamed & Abbasi, Babak & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Klibi, Walid, 2024. "Supply chain network design with financial considerations: A comprehensive review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 799-839.
    2. Gilani, Hani & Sahebi, Hadi, 2022. "A data-driven robust optimization model by cutting hyperplanes on vaccine access uncertainty in COVID-19 vaccine supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Margolis, Joshua T. & Sullivan, Kelly M. & Mason, Scott J. & Magagnotti, Mariah, 2018. "A multi-objective optimization model for designing resilient supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 174-185.
    4. Van Engeland, Jens & Beliën, Jeroen & De Boeck, Liesje & De Jaeger, Simon, 2020. "Literature review: Strategic network optimization models in waste reverse supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Sahling, Florian & Kayser, Ariane, 2016. "Strategic supply network planning with vendor selection under consideration of risk and demand uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 201-214.
    6. Fattahi, Mohammad & Govindan, Kannan & Keyvanshokooh, Esmaeil, 2017. "Responsive and resilient supply chain network design under operational and disruption risks with delivery lead-time sensitive customers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 176-200.
    7. Snoeck, André & Udenio, Maximiliano & Fransoo, Jan C., 2019. "A stochastic program to evaluate disruption mitigation investments in the supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 516-530.
    8. Kanokporn Kungwalsong & Abraham Mendoza & Vasanth Kamath & Subramanian Pazhani & Jose Antonio Marmolejo-Saucedo, 2022. "An application of interactive fuzzy optimization model for redesigning supply chain for resilience," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1803-1839, August.
    9. Brandenburg, Marcus, 2017. "A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 58-76.
    10. Xifeng Tang & Jiantao Wu & Rui Li, 2020. "Efficient Allocation of Customers to Facilities in the Multi-Objective Sustainable Location Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-12, September.
    11. Rezapour, Shabnam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Pourakbar, Morteza, 2017. "Resilient supply chain network design under competition: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 1017-1035.
    12. Sprenger, Philipp & Parlings, Matthias & Hegmanns, Tobias, 2014. "Planning Approach for Robust Manufacturing Footprint Decisions," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Next Generation Supply Chains: Trends and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 18, volume 18, pages 29-50, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    13. Tordecilla-Madera, Rafael & Polo, Andrés & Muñoz, Dairo & González-Rodríguez, Leonardo, 2017. "A robust design for a Colombian dairy cooperative's milk storage and refrigeration logistics system using binary programming," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 710-720.
    14. Jordi Pereira & Mariona Vilà, 2016. "A new model for supply chain network design with integrated assembly line balancing decisions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 2653-2669, May.
    15. Becker, Tristan & Lier, Stefan & Werners, Brigitte, 2019. "Value of modular production concepts in future chemical industry production networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 957-970.
    16. Longinidis, Pantelis & Georgiadis, Michael C., 2014. "Integration of sale and leaseback in the optimal design of supply chain networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 73-89.
    17. Ghanei, Shima & Contreras, Ivan & Cordeau, Jean-François, 2023. "A two-stage stochastic collaborative intertwined supply network design problem under multiple disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    18. Mallidis, I. & Vlachos, D. & Dekker, R., 2010. "Greening Supply Chains: Impact on Cost and Design," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-39a, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    19. Fernández, Elena & Pozo, Miguel A. & Puerto, Justo & Scozzari, Andrea, 2017. "Ordered Weighted Average optimization in Multiobjective Spanning Tree Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 886-903.
    20. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Moghadam, Hani Shahmoradi, 2016. "Designing a supply chain resilient to major disruptions and supply/demand interruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 121-149.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:78:y:2018:i:c:p:139-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.