IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v37y2009i2p450-462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating preference information in interactive reference point methods for multiobjective optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Luque, Mariano
  • Miettinen, Kaisa
  • Eskelinen, Petri
  • Ruiz, Francisco

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce new ways of utilizing preference information specified by the decision maker in interactive reference point based methods. A reference point consists of desirable values for each objective function. The idea is to take the desires of the decision maker into account more closely when projecting the reference point onto the set of nondominated solutions. In this way we can support the decision maker in finding the most satisfactory solutions faster. In practice, we adjust the weights in the achievement scalarizing function that projects the reference point. We identify different cases depending on the amount of additional information available and demonstrate the cases with examples. Finally, we summarize results of extensive computational tests that give evidence of the efficiency of the ideas proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Luque, Mariano & Miettinen, Kaisa & Eskelinen, Petri & Ruiz, Francisco, 2009. "Incorporating preference information in interactive reference point methods for multiobjective optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 450-462, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:37:y:2009:i:2:p:450-462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(07)00093-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariano Luque & Rafael Caballero & Julian Molina & Francisco Ruiz, 2007. "Equivalent Information for Multiobjective Interactive Procedures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 125-134, January.
    2. Rothermel, Mary Anne & Schilling, David A, 1984. "A comparative study of three methods of eliciting preference information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 379-389.
    3. M Köksalan & E Karasakal, 2006. "An interactive approach for multiobjective decision making," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(5), pages 532-540, May.
    4. Stewart, TJ, 1992. "A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 20(5-6), pages 569-586.
    5. Ehrgott, Matthias & Tenfelde-Podehl, Dagmar, 2003. "Computation of ideal and Nadir values and implications for their use in MCDM methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 119-139, November.
    6. Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Wierzbicki, Adam & Milewski, Marcin, 2008. "A multi-criteria approach to fair and efficient bandwidth allocation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 451-463, June.
    7. Miettinen, Kaisa & Makela, Marko M., 2006. "Synchronous approach in interactive multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(3), pages 909-922, May.
    8. Miettinen, Kaisa & Makela, Marko M. & Kaario, Katja, 2006. "Experiments with classification-based scalarizing functions in interactive multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 931-947, December.
    9. Korhonen, Pekka J. & Laakso, Jukka, 1986. "A visual interactive method for solving the multiple criteria problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 277-287, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruiz, Francisco & Luque, Mariano & Miguel, Francisca & del Mar Munoz, Maria, 2008. "An additive achievement scalarizing function for multiobjective programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(3), pages 683-694, August.
    2. Rafael Rodríguez & Mariano Luque & Mercedes González, 2011. "Portfolio selection in the Spanish stock market by interactive multiobjective programming," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(1), pages 213-231, July.
    3. Ana Ruiz & Rubén Saborido & Mariano Luque, 2015. "A preference-based evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization: the weighting achievement scalarizing function genetic algorithm," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 101-129, May.
    4. Francisco Ruiz & Mariano Luque & Kaisa Miettinen, 2012. "Improving the computational efficiency in a global formulation (GLIDE) for interactive multiobjective optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 47-70, August.
    5. F Ruiz & M Luque & J M Cabello, 2009. "A classification of the weighting schemes in reference point procedures for multiobjective programming," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(4), pages 544-553, April.
    6. Kathrin Klamroth & Kaisa Miettinen, 2008. "Integrating Approximation and Interactive Decision Making in Multicriteria Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 222-234, February.
    7. Lu Chen & Kaisa Miettinen & Bin Xin & Vesa Ojalehto, 2023. "Comparing reference point based interactive multiobjective optimization methods without a human decision maker," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 757-788, March.
    8. Luque, M. & Marcenaro-Gutiérrez, O.D. & López-Agudo, L.A., 2015. "On the potential balance among compulsory education outcomes through econometric and multiobjective programming analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 527-540.
    9. Rafael Lazimy, 2013. "Interactive Polyhedral Outer Approximation (IPOA) strategy for general multiobjective optimization problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 73-99, November.
    10. Belton, Valerie & Hodgkin, Julie, 1999. "Facilitators, decision makers, D.I.Y. users: Is intelligent multicriteria decision support for all feasible or desirable?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 247-260, March.
    11. Tarja Joro & Pekka Korhonen & Jyrki Wallenius, 1998. "Structural Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Multiple Objective Linear Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(7), pages 962-970, July.
    12. J. Cabello & M. Luque & F. Miguel & A. Ruiz & F. Ruiz, 2014. "A multiobjective interactive approach to determine the optimal electricity mix in Andalucía (Spain)," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 109-127, April.
    13. Kaynar, Nur & Karsu, Özlem, 2018. "Equitable decision making approaches over allocations of multiple benefits to multiple entities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 85-98.
    14. Karakaya, G. & Köksalan, M., 2023. "Finding preferred solutions under weighted Tchebycheff preference functions for multi-objective integer programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 215-228.
    15. Molina, Julin & Santana, Luis V. & Hernandez-Daz, Alfredo G. & Coello Coello, Carlos A. & Caballero, Rafael, 2009. "g-dominance: Reference point based dominance for multiobjective metaheuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 685-692, September.
    16. Tofallis, C., 1996. "Improving discernment in DEA using profiling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 361-364, June.
    17. A.P. Wierzbicki, 1998. "Reference Point Methods in Vector Optimization and Decision Support," Working Papers ir98017, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    18. Kaliszewski, Ignacy & Michalowski, Wojtek, 1999. "Searching for psychologically stable solutions of multiple criteria decision problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 549-562, November.
    19. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    20. J. Granat & M. Makowski, 1998. "ISAAP - Interactive Specification and Analysis of Aspiration-Based Preferences," Working Papers ir98052, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:37:y:2009:i:2:p:450-462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.