IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v31y2003i3p157-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the bullwhip and inventory variance produced by an ordering policy

Author

Listed:
  • Disney, S. M.
  • Towill, D. R.

Abstract

The Bullwhip Problem in supply chains is first outlined. A discrete control theory model of a generic model of a replenishment rule is presented. From this model, an analytical expression for bullwhip is derived that is directly equivalent to the common statistical measure often used in simulation, statistical and empirical studies to quantify the bullwhip effect. This analytical expression clearly shows that bullwhip can be reduced by taking a fraction of the error in the inventory position and pipeline position, rather then account for all of the errors every time an ordering decision is made as is common in many scheduling systems. Furthermore, increasing the average age of the forecast reduces bullwhip, as does reducing the production lead-time. Next an analytical expression for the variance of the inventory position is derived and used together with the bullwhip expression to determine suitable ordering system designs that minimise both bullwhip and inventory variance for a range of weightings between the two variances. The relationship between our Bullwhip metric and the control theory metric Noise Bandwidth is highlighted. This contribution then derives and exploits an analytical expression for the Integral of Time * Absolute Error (ITAE) criterion often used to quantify inventory responsiveness in response to a deterministic demand. The results form a Decision Support System that can be used to design balanced supply chain ordering decisions and clearly shows how the Bullwhip Effect can be reduced, at the expense of increased inventory recovery times. Thus, this paper presents the general solution to the bullwhip problem on a sound mathematical basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Disney, S. M. & Towill, D. R., 2003. "On the bullwhip and inventory variance produced by an ordering policy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 157-167, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:31:y:2003:i:3:p:157-167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(03)00028-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 1997. "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 546-558, April.
    2. Dejonckheere, J. & Disney, S. M. & Lambrecht, M. R. & Towill, D. R., 2003. "Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(3), pages 567-590, June.
    3. Herbert J. Vassian, 1955. "Application of Discrete Variable Servo Theory to Inventory Control," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 272-282, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Yungao & Wang, Nengmin & He, Zhengwen & Lu, Jizhou & Liang, Huigang, 2015. "Analysis of the bullwhip effect in two parallel supply chains with interacting price-sensitive demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 815-825.
    2. A A Syntetos & J E Boylan & S M Disney, 2009. "Forecasting for inventory planning: a 50-year review," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 149-160, May.
    3. Lin, J. & Naim, M.M. & Purvis, L. & Gosling, J., 2017. "The extension and exploitation of the inventory and order based production control system archetype from 1982 to 2015," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 135-152.
    4. Warburton, Roger D. H., 2004. "An exact analytical solution to the production inventory control problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 81-96, November.
    5. Disney, S.M. & Farasyn, I. & Lambrecht, M. & Towill, D.R. & de Velde, W. Van, 2006. "Taming the bullwhip effect whilst watching customer service in a single supply chain echelon," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 151-172, August.
    6. Gaalman, Gerard & Disney, Stephen M., 2006. "State space investigation of the bullwhip problem with ARMA(1,1) demand processes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 327-339, December.
    7. Hoberg, Kai & Thonemann, Ulrich W., 2014. "Modeling and analyzing information delays in supply chains using transfer functions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 132-145.
    8. Disney, S.M. & Towill, D.R., 2005. "Eliminating drift in inventory and order based production control systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 331-344, January.
    9. Rostami-Tabar, Bahman & Disney, Stephen M., 2023. "On the order-up-to policy with intermittent integer demand and logically consistent forecasts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    10. Boute, Robert N. & Disney, Stephen M. & Lambrecht, Marc R. & Van Houdt, Benny, 2007. "An integrated production and inventory model to dampen upstream demand variability in the supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 121-142, April.
    11. Dejonckheere, J. & Disney, S. M. & Lambrecht, M. R. & Towill, D. R., 2004. "The impact of information enrichment on the Bullwhip effect in supply chains: A control engineering perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(3), pages 727-750, March.
    12. Hoberg, Kai & Bradley, James R. & Thonemann, Ulrich W., 2007. "Analyzing the effect of the inventory policy on order and inventory variability with linear control theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1620-1642, February.
    13. K. Devika & A. Jafarian & A. Hassanzadeh & R. Khodaverdi, 2016. "Optimizing of bullwhip effect and net stock amplification in three-echelon supply chains using evolutionary multi-objective metaheuristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 457-487, July.
    14. Pastore, Erica & Alfieri, Arianna & Zotteri, Giulio, 2019. "An empirical investigation on the antecedents of the bullwhip effect: Evidence from the spare parts industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 121-133.
    15. Wang, Zhaodong & Wang, Xin & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2015. "Bounded growth of the bullwhip effect under a class of nonlinear ordering policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 72-82.
    16. Zhang, Xiaolong & Burke, Gerard J., 2011. "Analysis of compound bullwhip effect causes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 514-526, May.
    17. Meixell, Mary J., 2005. "The impact of setup costs, commonality, and capacity on schedule stability: An exploratory study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 95-107, January.
    18. Disney, Stephen M. & Towill, Denis R. & Warburton, Roger D.H., 2006. "On the equivalence of control theoretic, differential, and difference equation approaches to modeling supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 194-208, May.
    19. Ouyang, Yanfeng & Daganzo, Carlos, 2008. "Robust tests for the bullwhip effect in supply chains with stochastic dynamics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 340-353, February.
    20. Hosoda, Takamichi & Disney, Stephen M., 2018. "A unified theory of the dynamics of closed-loop supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 313-326.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:31:y:2003:i:3:p:157-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.