Comparing the allocative efficiencies of hospitals
A new technique for comparing the performance of firms in controlling costs is introduced and applied to a sample of 60 hospitals. The multi-output, multi-input approach utilizes observed costs, process counts and non-controllable factors for a sample of hospitals to form peer groups to build allocative cost frontiers. The approach can be used to provide insights regarding conjectures about the relative efficiencies of various institutional types as well as the cost differentials associated with different levels of quality of care. The programming approach handles environmental factors such as case mix severity, the teaching mission of the institution, etc. Our illustrative results found an average of a 14% differential in the efficient cost between public and not-for-profits. Much better data is needed before any definitive findings can be stated, but the type of insights regarding the varying degree of separation of the cost frontiers for different levels of outputs is concretely illustrated.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 18 (1990)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description|
|Order Information:|| Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:18:y:1990:i:1:p:71-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.