IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfpoli/v29y2004i6p609-620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-market surveillance model for potential human health effects of novel foods

Author

Listed:
  • Amanor-Boadu, Vincent

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanor-Boadu, Vincent, 2004. "Post-market surveillance model for potential human health effects of novel foods," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 609-620, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:29:y:2004:i:6:p:609-620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306-9192(04)00064-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boehlje, Michael & Doering, Otto C., III, 2000. "Farm Policy In An Industrialized Agriculture," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 18(1), pages 1-8, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. May, Daniel E., 2011. "Incentives of small countries to participate in a global free trade agreement in agriculture: a theoretical analysis," Economi­a Agraria (Revista Economia Agraria), Agrarian Economist Association (AEA), Chile, vol. 15, pages 1-7.
    2. Daniel May, 2011. "Agricultural trade liberalization under bilateralism: an international network perspective," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 10(1), pages 23-34, April.
    3. Kherallah, Mylene & Kirsten, Johann F, 2002. "The New Institutional Economics: Applications For Agricultural Policy Research In Developing Countries," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 41(2).
    4. V. Bečvářová, 2005. "Agribusiness - a scope as well as an opportunity for contemporary agriculture," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(7), pages 285-292.
    5. Kherallah, Mylène & Kirsten, Johann, 2001. "The new institutional economics," MSSD discussion papers 41, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Bor, Özgür, 2013. "Agrarian Transformation: Power And Dominance In Markets," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 1(1), pages 1-12, July.
    7. May, Daniel E., 2011. "Incentives of small countries to participate in a global free trade agreement in agriculture: a theoretical analysis," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15.
    8. Liang Cheng & Huimin Huang & Yong Sun & Zhicui Li & Hongyan Du, 2024. "The Evolutionary Game in Regulating Non-Agricultural Farmland Use within the Integrated Development of Rural Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Industries," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    9. May, Daniel E., 2013. "PR - Export Instability When International Agricultural Markets Operate Under Oligopoly," 19th Congress, Warsaw, Poland, 2013 345682, International Farm Management Association.
    10. Sartorius, K & Kirsten, J, 2002. "Can Small-Scale Farmers Be Linked To Agribusiness? The Timber Experience," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 41(4).
    11. V. Bečvářová, 2007. "An impact of direct payments on production decisions in agriculture," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(7), pages 325-332.
    12. Daniel Esteban May, 2012. "Addressing biodiversity loss when international markets of agricultural commodities are oligopolistic," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 53-57.
    13. Masuku, MB & Kirsten, JF & Van Rooyen, CJ & Perret, S, 2003. "Contractual Relationships Between Small-Holder Sugarcane Growers And Millers In The Sugar Industry Supply Chain In Swaziland," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 42(3).
    14. Sartorius, Kurt & Kirsten, Johann, 2007. "A framework to facilitate institutional arrangements for smallholder supply in developing countries: An agribusiness perspective," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5-6), pages 640-655.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:29:y:2004:i:6:p:609-620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.