IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v101y2025ics004723522500176x.html

Wrongful convictions in Spain: Systematic analysis of judgments from 1996 to 2022

Author

Listed:
  • Sánchez, Nuria
  • Blanco-Velasco, Guadalupe
  • Geven, Linda M.
  • Masip, Jaume
  • Manzanero, Antonio L.

Abstract

A comprehensive analysis of wrongful convictions in Spain was conducted. Out of 447 Supreme Court judgments made between 1996 and 2022, 243 cases involving a successful appeal made by a person claiming their innocence were examined in terms of the characteristics of wrongfully convicted individuals, the crime types, and the factors contributing to these judicial errors. An average rate of nine wrongful convictions per year was found, mostly for crimes against public safety and property, with a significant overrepresentation of foreign citizens. Legal professionals' misconduct was identified as the main factor contributing to these wrongful convictions. The mean time between the judgment and the conviction being overturned was around 4.5 years. More than half of the cases were reopened due to evidence indicating that the alleged crime never occurred. While new evidence was the primary reason for reopening cases, only 3 % were reopened based on DNA evidence. The systematic methodology used in this research may serve as a model for future studies on wrongful convictions in other countries. To reduce wrongful convictions in Spain, several key measures must be implemented. Legal representation should be mandatory for all individuals accused of crimes, without exception. Legal professionals must receive enhanced training to minimize judicial errors. Furthermore, stricter forensic protocols should be established, and forensic experts must be properly accredited to prevent the misapplication of scientific evidence in legal proceedings. Additionally, reforms are needed to ensure that plea bargains are subject to more rigorous scrutiny, and that minor crimes are properly investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Sánchez, Nuria & Blanco-Velasco, Guadalupe & Geven, Linda M. & Masip, Jaume & Manzanero, Antonio L., 2025. "Wrongful convictions in Spain: Systematic analysis of judgments from 1996 to 2022," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s004723522500176x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004723522500176X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102527?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt, Priscillia Evelyne & Saunders, Jessica & Kilmer, Beau, 2019. "Estimates of Law Enforcement Costs by Crime Type for Benefit-Cost Analyses," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 95-123, April.
    2. Samuel R. Gross & Barbara O'Brien, 2008. "Frequency and Predictors of False Conviction: Why We Know So Little, and New Data on Capital Cases," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(4), pages 927-962, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hauck, Jingyi & Yang, Eunbyeor Sophie, 2025. "Does New York State bail reform moderate the impact of pretrial detention on conviction rates?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Jorge Luis García & Frederik H. Bennhoff & Duncan Ermini Leaf & James J. Heckman, 2021. "The Dynastic Benefits of Early Childhood Education," NBER Working Papers 29004, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Wheeler, Andrew Palmer & Reuter, Sydney, 2020. "Redrawing hot spots of crime in Dallas, Texas," SocArXiv nmq8r, Center for Open Science.
    4. Chong Peng & Weizeng Sun & Xi Zhang, 2022. "Crime under the Light? Examining the Effects of Nighttime Lighting on Crime in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Abi Adams & Kristiina Huttunen & Emily Nix & Ning Zhang, 2026. "The economic impacts of rape," IFS Working Papers W26/15, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Michael Mueller-Smith & Benjamin Pyle & Caroline Walker, 2023. "Estimating the Impact of the Age of Criminal Majority: Decomposing Multiple Treatments in a Regression Discontinuity Framework," Working Papers 23-01, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    7. Castillo-Manzano, José I. & Castro-Nuño, Mercedes & Lopez-Valpuesta, Lourdes, 2024. "Planning traffic surveillance in Spain: How to optimize the management of police resources to reduce road fatalities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Nathaniel J. Glasser & Harold A. Pollack & Megan L. Ranney & Marian E. Betz, 2022. "Economics and Public Health: Two Perspectives on Firearm Injury Prevention," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 704(1), pages 44-69, November.
    9. Charles E. Loeffler & Jordan Hyatt & Greg Ridgeway, 2019. "Measuring Self-Reported Wrongful Convictions Among Prisoners," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 259-286, June.
    10. repec:osf:socarx:nmq8r_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Carter, Jeremy G. & Mohler, George & Raje, Rajeev & Chowdhury, Nahida & Pandey, Saurabh, 2021. "The Indianapolis harmspot policing experiment," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Rocco d’Este & Noam Yuchtman, 2026. "DNA laws and the pursuit of racial justice: Access to forensic DNA technology and the exoneration of the wrongfully convicted," IFS Working Papers W26/20, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    13. Oramas Mora, Daniela & Mitchell, Ojmarrh & Spohn, Cassia, 2025. "Does variation across judicial circuits matter? Examining the role of bail schedules and pretrial detention on drug case outcomes in Florida," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:101:y:2025:i:c:s004723522500176x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.