IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v69y2016i11p5479-5486.html

Decoding the complexity of the consumer-based brand equity process

Author

Listed:
  • Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi
  • Veloutsou, Cleopatra
  • Christodoulides, George

Abstract

Brand equity is a valuable (intangible) asset for firms. Research examines brand equity from the side of consumers, firms, or other stakeholders. Consumer-based brand equity focuses on consumers and represents positive business outcomes. Despite its importance, most extant literature focuses on brand equity as a construct, thus failing to recognize the complexity of the phenomenon. This study uses complexity theory and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to put forth an empirically validated framework that shows consumer-based brand equity as a dynamic and sequential process consisting of three blocks: Brand building, brand understanding, and brand relationships. This study provides insights into the creation process of brand equity, and helps progress the discussion from a focus on brand equity as a construct to a focus on brand equity as a process.

Suggested Citation

  • Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi & Veloutsou, Cleopatra & Christodoulides, George, 2016. "Decoding the complexity of the consumer-based brand equity process," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5479-5486.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:11:p:5479-5486
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296316303630
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.159?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hardesty, David M. & Bearden, William O., 2004. "The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 98-107, February.
    2. Netemeyer, Richard G. & Krishnan, Balaji & Pullig, Chris & Wang, Guangping & Yagci, Mehmet & Dean, Dwane & Ricks, Joe & Wirth, Ferdinand, 2004. "Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 209-224, February.
    3. Woodside, Arch G., 2014. "Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2495-2503.
    4. Henderson, Geraldine R. & Iacobucci, Dawn & Calder, Bobby J., 1998. "Brand diagnostics: Mapping branding effects using consumer associative networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 306-327, December.
    5. Yoo, Boonghee & Donthu, Naveen, 2001. "Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Smit, Edith & Bronner, Fred & Tolboom, Maarten, 2007. "Brand relationship quality and its value for personal contact," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 627-633, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi & Christodoulides, George & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2019. "Managing the consumer-based brand equity process: A cross-cultural perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 328-343.
    2. Lai-cheung Leung, 2016. "The Role of Consumer-Brand Experiences and Relationship in Contributing to Brand Equity for Services," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 2(2), pages 195-216, April.
    3. Anselmsson, Johan & Burt, Steve & Tunca, Burak, 2017. "An integrated retailer image and brand equity framework: Re-examining, extending, and restructuring retailer brand equity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 194-203.
    4. Eunmi Lee & Li Zhao, 2023. "Understanding Purchase Intention of Fair Trade Handicrafts through the Lens of Geographical Indication and Fair Trade Knowledge in a Brand Equity Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. de Oliveira, Marta Olivia Rovedder & Silveira, Cleo Schmitt & Luce, Fernando Bins, 2015. "Brand equity estimation model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2560-2568.
    6. Machiel J. Reinders & Jos Bartels, 2017. "The roles of identity and brand equity in organic consumption behavior: Private label brands versus national brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 68-85, January.
    7. Sigurdsson, Valdimar & Larsen, Nils Magne & Folwarczny, Michał & Sigurdardottir, Freyja Thoroddsen & Menon, R.G. Vishnu & Fagerstrøm, Asle, 2024. "Big business returns on B Corp? Growing with green & lean as any label is a good label," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Alexandria M. Gain & Leonard V. Coote & André Bonfrer, 2024. "Conceptualising and measuring consumer perceptions of brand wastefulness," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(6), pages 557-575, November.
    9. Betül Çal & Mary Lambkin, 2017. "Brand equity of stock exchange as a mediator in financial decisions," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 14-23, March.
    10. Rojas-Lamorena, Álvaro J. & Del Barrio-García, Salvador & Alcántara-Pilar, Juan Miguel, 2022. "A review of three decades of academic research on brand equity: A bibliometric approach using co-word analysis and bibliographic coupling," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1067-1083.
    11. Wang, Luming & Finn, Adam, 2014. "A psychometric theory that measures up to marketing reality: An adapted Many Faceted IRT model," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 93-102.
    12. Boisvert, Jean & Christodoulides, George & Sajid Khan, M., 2023. "Toward a better understanding of key determinants and consequences of masstige consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    13. Lang, Le Dang & Lim, Weng Marc & Guzmán, Francisco, 2022. "How does promotion mix affect brand equity? Insights from a mixed-methods study of low involvement products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 175-190.
    14. Kapoor, Ankur & Sahay, Arvind & Singh, Nandini C. & Chandrasekhar Pammi, V.S. & Banerjee, Prantosh, 2023. "The neural correlates and the underlying processes of weak brand choices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Shyh-Ming Huang & Shyh-Rong Fang & Shih-Chieh Fang & Chao-Chin Huang, 2016. "The influences of brand benefits on brand loyalty: Intermediate mechanisms," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 41(1), pages 141-160, February.
    16. Jesús J. Cambra-Fierro & María Fuentes-Blasco & Rocío Huerta-Álvarez & Ana Olavarría, 2021. "Customer-based brand equity and customer engagement in experiential services: insights from an emerging economy," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(3), pages 467-491, September.
    17. Wang, Luming & Finn, Adam, 2013. "Dual-faceted multidimensional IRT models with hierarchical structure," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 111-118.
    18. Pankaj Kumar Singh & J. K. Pattanayak, 2016. "Study of the Relationship among the Factors of Brand Equity: A Study on Fast-food Brands," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1227-1239, October.
    19. Daha Tijjani Abdurrahaman & Acheampong Owusu & Akeem Soladoye Bakare & Adeyanju Apejoye & Muhammad Muhsin Ibrahim & Tijjani Habibu Ahmad, 2021. "Assessing the effects of Celebrity Endorsements of Political Parties: An empirical study of Nigerian 2019 Presidential Elections," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 22(1), pages 676-699, August.
    20. Abdelbaset M. Alkhawaldeh & Salniza Md. Salleh & Fairol Bin Halim, 2016. "Brand Equity and Brand Loyalty: New Perspective," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 722-730.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:11:p:5479-5486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.