IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jaecon/v8y1986i1p73-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit technology and preferences for auditing standards

Author

Listed:
  • Kinney, William Jr.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Kinney, William Jr., 1986. "Audit technology and preferences for auditing standards," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 73-89, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:8:y:1986:i:1:p:73-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165-4101(86)90011-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Lys, 1993. "Discussion: The Evolution of Lawsuits Against Auditors—Determinants, Consequences, and Solutions," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(3), pages 427-433, September.
    2. Bala V. Balachandran & Daniel Simon, 1993. "Audit Services and Fees of Large Accounting Firms," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(3), pages 339-348, September.
    3. Isabelle Fabioux, 2016. "Le processus de normalisation de l’audit : état de l’art et voies de recherches futures," Post-Print hal-01902563, HAL.
    4. Paul Danos & John W. Eichenseher & Doris L. Holt, 1989. "Specialized knowledge and its communication in auditing," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 91-109, September.
    5. Vishal P. Baloria, 2017. "Discussion of “An Examination of the U.S. Public Accounting Profession’s Public Interest Discourse and Actions in Federal Policy Making”," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 221-224, May.
    6. Daniel Aobdia, 2020. "The Economic Consequences of Audit Firms’ Quality Control System Deficiencies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 2883-2905, July.
    7. Ahmad Hussein Juma’h, 2014. "The Materiality Concept: Implications for Managers and Investors," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 6(1), pages 159-168, April.
    8. Fischer, Michael J., 1996. ""Real-izing" the benefits of new technologies as a source of audit evidence: An interpretive field study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(2-3), pages 219-242.
    9. Kenneth B. Schwartz & Billy S. Soo, 1996. "The Association Between Auditor Changes and Reporting Lags," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 353-370, March.
    10. Donald A. Leslie, 1989. "Discussion of “Specialized knowledge and its communication in auditingâ€," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 110-118, September.
    11. Arrunada, Benito & Paz-Ares, Candido, 1997. "Mandatory rotation of company auditors: A critical examination," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 31-61, March.
    12. Isabelle Fabioux, 2021. "Dynamique au sein de la sphère normative de l’audit en France (2001-2020)," Post-Print hal-03361493, HAL.
    13. Climent-Serrano, Salvador & Bustos-Contell, Elisabeth & Labatut-Serer, Gregorio & Rey-Martí, Andrea, 2018. "Low-cost trends in audit fees and their impact on service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 345-350.
    14. Brown, Lawrence D., 1996. "Influential accounting articles, individuals, Ph.D. granting institutions and faculties: A citational analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(7-8), pages 723-754.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:8:y:1986:i:1:p:73-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.