IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ireced/v50y2025ics1477388025000222.html

More than just a weighted average: Economic statistics with auto specs grading

Author

Listed:
  • Savelle, Daniel
  • Savelle, Mai

Abstract

We introduce a new version of specifications (specs) grading, automatic (auto) specs grading, which breaks a course into modules with asynchronous, automatically graded quizzes. Each module has a core quiz which evaluates required knowledge and a proficiency quiz which evaluates more advanced concepts. All core quizzes must be completed to pass the course with each additional proficiency quiz further increasing a student’s final grade. Auto specs grading aims to promote learning by providing grade transparency, allowing for asynchronous learning, and aligning student incentives to match course goals. While causality is hard to deduce given the data, we provide evidence of improvement with student performance, engagement with key material, and course evaluations after implementation. The grading scheme involved significant upfront investment, but in return, this change decreased grading time and freed up class time previously dedicated to exams.

Suggested Citation

  • Savelle, Daniel & Savelle, Mai, 2025. "More than just a weighted average: Economic statistics with auto specs grading," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:50:y:2025:i:c:s1477388025000222
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iree.2025.100330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388025000222
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iree.2025.100330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boulatoff, Catherine & Cyrus, Teresa L., 2022. "Improving student outcomes in large introductory courses," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    2. Ben O. Smith & Dustin R. White & Patricia C. Kuzyk & James E. Tierney, 2018. "Improved grade outcomes with an e-mailed “grade nudge”," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 1-7, January.
    3. Austin Boyle & William L. Goffe, 2018. "Beyond the Flipped Class: The Impact of Research-Based Teaching Methods in a Macroeconomics Principles Class," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 108, pages 297-301, May.
    4. Huskisson, Sinead & O'Mahony, Tom & Lacey, Seán, 2024. "Improving student outcomes using automated feedback in a first-year economics class," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    5. KimMarie McGoldrick & Peter W. Schuhmann, 2016. "The Impact of Challenge Quizzes on Student Knowledge," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 373-377, May.
    6. Vrishtee Rane & Cameron A. MacKenzie, 2020. "Evaluating students with online testing modules in engineering economics: A comparision of student performance with online testing and with traditional assessments," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(3), pages 213-235, July.
    7. Greg Gaynor & Kevin T. Wynne & Ting Zhang & Daniel Gerlowski & Joel N. Morse, 2024. "Online proctoring discount: The role of measured stressors," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 193-204, July.
    8. Jill Caviglia-Harris, 2016. "Targeting Teaching: Flipping the Undergraduate Economics Classroom: Using Online Videos to Enhance Teaching and Learning," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 83(1), pages 321-331, July.
    9. Stankov, Petar, 2024. "The death of exams? Grade inflation and student satisfaction when coursework replaces exams," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    10. Lanier Nalley & Andrew McKenzie, 2011. "How Much is That Exam Grade Really Worth? An Estimation of Student Risk Aversion to Their Unknown Final College Course Grades," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 338-353, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martinez, Gabriel X., 2023. "Studying like a nerd: Spacing, self-testing, and explanatory questioning in principles of microeconomics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    2. Kuo, Sylvia, 2022. "The impact of distributed homework on student outcomes," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    3. Squires, Alex & Rigby, Dan, 2024. "A mixed methods evaluation of online discussion tools in higher education," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    4. Yasukazu Ichino & Toru Kawai & Mifuyu Kira & Mai Seki, 2025. "The Effects of Flipped Classroom in Higher Education on Learning Outcomes and the Heterogeneity by Group Member Characteristics," OSIPP Discussion Paper 25E001, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
    5. Gordanier, John & Hauk, William & Sankaran, Chandini, 2019. "Early intervention in college classes and improved student outcomes," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 23-29.
    6. Zhonggen Yu & Mingle Gao, 2022. "Effects of Video Length on a Flipped English Classroom," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    7. Wolfe, Marketa Halova, 2020. "Integrating data analysis into an introductory macroeconomics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    8. Huskisson, Sinead & O'Mahony, Tom & Lacey, Seán, 2024. "Improving student outcomes using automated feedback in a first-year economics class," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    9. Ahlstrom, Laura J. & Harter, Cynthia & Asarta, Carlos J., 2023. "Teaching methods and materials in undergraduate economics courses: School, instructor, and department effects," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    10. Josephson, Anna & DeBoer, Lawrence & Nelson, David & Zissimopoulos, Angelika, 2016. "Reshaped for Higher Order Learning: Student Outcomes in the Redesign of an Undergraduate Macroeconomics Course," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235765, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Fiedler, Alexandra & Döpke, Jörg, 2025. "Do humans identify AI-generated text better than machines? Evidence based on excerpts from German theses☆," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    12. Peter Mikek, 2023. "A Flipped Classroom Experiment in Growth Theory," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(3), pages 433-456, June.
    13. Isabella Seeber & Carolin Fleischmann & Peter Cardon & Jolanta Aritz, 2024. "Fostering Psychological Safety in Global Virtual Teams: The Role of Team-Based Interventions and Digital Reminder Nudges," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 1405-1427, December.
    14. Amanda Bayer & Gregory Bruich & Raj Chetty & Andrew Housiaux, 2020. "Expanding and diversifying the pool of undergraduates who study economics: Insights from a new introductory course at Harvard," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3-4), pages 364-379, September.
    15. Alicia Brandt & Hamid R. Oskorouchi & Alfonso Sousa-Poza, 2024. "The effect of SMS nudges on higher education performance," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 66(5), pages 2311-2334, May.
    16. Johnson, Marianne & Meder, Martin E., 2024. "Twenty-three years of teaching economics with technology," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    17. Calimeris, Lauren, 2018. "Effects of flipping the principles of microeconomics class: Does scheduling matter?," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 29-43.
    18. Ganguli, Ina & Haidar, Jamal Ibrahim & Khwaja, Asim Ijaz & Stemper, Samuel & Zafar, Basit, 2024. "Economic shocks and skill acquisition: Evidence from a national online learning platform at the onset of COVID-19," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    19. Jens Schubert, 2023. "The Effect of Gender on Study Effort: Nudges Versus Market Incentives," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 68(1), pages 24-44, March.
    20. Kassis, Mary M. & Hildebrandt, Melanie & Holder, Kim & Boldt, David J., 2025. "Student perceptions of learning with SoftChalk: Economics lessons and activities," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:50:y:2025:i:c:s1477388025000222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-review-of-economics-education .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.