IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ireced/v46y2024ics1477388024000069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are we doing homework wrong? The marginal effect of homework using spaced repetition

Author

Listed:
  • Green, Alan

Abstract

While assigning homework in college courses is supported by both psychological research on memory and studies of economics classes, research examining the marginal effect of homework scores on exam performance generally shows insignificant results. These weak marginal effects may be due to the number of times students repeat the work and how spread out they are; the few studies that show positive marginal effects of homework performance use at least three spaced repetitions. This study evaluates a spaced repetition model of short homework assignments repeated at increasing intervals in intermediate microeconomics. Results show a positive significant marginal effect; students who did better on the homework assignments scored higher on both in class exams and a cumulative final. The implication is that the simple change of structuring homework assignments with additional spaced repetitions may significantly improve learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Green, Alan, 2024. "Are we doing homework wrong? The marginal effect of homework using spaced repetition," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:46:y:2024:i:c:s1477388024000069
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iree.2024.100288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388024000069
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iree.2024.100288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdullah Al-Bahrani & Maria Apostolova-Mihaylova & Emily C. Marshall, 2022. "Helping some and harming others: Homework frequency and tradeoffs in student performance," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 197-209, June.
    2. Alan Green, 2016. "Significant returns in engagement and performance with a free teaching app," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Flannery, Darragh & Kennelly, Brendan & Considine, John, 2013. "Paper and online assignments in economics: A comparison with panel data," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 31-43.
    4. Brendan Kennelly & John Considine & Darragh Flannery, 2011. "Online Assignments in Economics: A Test of Their Effectiveness," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 136-146, June.
    5. Kuo, Sylvia, 2022. "The impact of distributed homework on student outcomes," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    6. Sam Allgood & William B. Walstad & John J. Siegfried, 2015. "Research on Teaching Economics to Undergraduates," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 53(2), pages 285-325, June.
    7. Ahlstrom, Laura J. & Harter, Cynthia & Asarta, Carlos J., 2023. "Teaching methods and materials in undergraduate economics courses: School, instructor, and department effects," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    8. Jaap M J Murre & Joeri Dros, 2015. "Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus’ Forgetting Curve," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, July.
    9. Green, Alan, 2014. "The case for the traditional classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 16(PB), pages 87-99.
    10. William L. Goffe & David Kauper, 2014. "A Survey of Principles Instructors: Why Lecture Prevails," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 360-375, December.
    11. Andrew Grodner & Nicholas G. Rupp, 2013. "The Role of Homework in Student Learning Outcomes: Evidence from a Field Experiment," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 93-109, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pratobevera, Giuseppe, 2022. "Homework and finance students’ learning and achievement," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    2. Rogmans, Tim, 2022. "The Impact of an Online Macroeconomics Simulation Game on Student Engagement and Performance," MPRA Paper 115283, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Klein, Alina F. & Klein, Rudolf F., 2023. "Improving student performance: Playing Survivor," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    4. Ronald C. Fisher, 2019. "Illustrative Assignments to Incorporate Research and Writing in Introductory Economics Classes," Journal of Economics Teaching, Journal of Economics Teaching, vol. 4(1), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Michael Batu & Esmond Lun & Nancy Bower & Asha Sadanand, 2017. "Testing the Effectiveness of Online Assignments in Theory of Finance," Working Papers 1707, University of Guelph, Department of Economics and Finance.
    6. Rita A. Balaban & Donna B. Gilleskie & Uyen Tran, 2016. "A quantitative evaluation of the flipped classroom in a large lecture principles of economics course," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 269-287, October.
    7. Anna Maximova & Steve Muchiri & Mihai Paraschiv, 2023. "A Stroll Down the Dollar Street: Teaching Per-Capita GDP Using Internationally Comparable Photographs," Journal of Economics Teaching, Journal of Economics Teaching, vol. 8(2), pages 87-113, May.
    8. A. Arrighetti & A. Lasagni, 2018. "Insegnare Economia Industriale ‘in a digital age’," Economics Department Working Papers 2018-EP06, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    9. Tim Rogmans, 2018. "Teaching Macroeconomics with the Econland Simulation Game and Learning Platform," Journal of Economics Teaching, Journal of Economics Teaching, vol. 2(2), pages 92-103, January.
    10. Chiang, Eric P. & Vazquez, Jose J., 2017. "The power of a simple verbal explanation: Evaluating the efficacy of narrated feedback," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 25-34.
    11. Jens Schubert, 2023. "The Effect of Gender on Study Effort: Nudges Versus Market Incentives," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 68(1), pages 24-44, March.
    12. Sepulveda, Cristian F., 2020. "Explaining the demand and supply model with the cost-benefit rule," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    13. Agasisti, Tommaso & Barucci, Emilio & Cannistrà, Marta & Marazzina, Daniele & Soncin, Mara, 2023. "Online or on-campus? Analysing the effects of financial education on student knowledge gain," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    14. Michael R. Hammock & P. Wesley Routon & Jay K. Walker, 2016. "The opinions of economics majors before and after learning economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 76-83, January.
    15. Calvin Thigpen & Kelcie Ralph & Nicholas J. Klein & Anne Brown, 2023. "Can information increase support for transportation reform? Results from an experiment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 893-912, June.
    16. Cattaneo, Cristina & D’Adda, Giovanna & Tavoni, Massimo & Bonan, Jacopo, 2019. "Can We Make Social Information Programs More Effective? The Role of Identity and Values," RFF Working Paper Series 19-21, Resources for the Future.
    17. Hadsell, Lester, 2020. "Not for want of trying: Effort and Success of women in principles of microeconomics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    18. William B. Walstad & Jamie Wagner, 2016. "The disaggregation of value-added test scores to assess learning outcomes in economics courses," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 121-131, April.
    19. Yann Algan & Pierre Cahuc & Andrei Shleifer, 2013. "Teaching Practices and Social Capital," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(3), pages 189-210, July.
    20. Carlos Cortinhas, 2017. "Does formative feedback help or hinder students? An empirical investigation," Discussion Papers 1701, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ireced:v:46:y:2024:i:c:s1477388024000069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-review-of-economics-education .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.